Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Downscaling humidity with Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) over the conterminous United States

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humidity is important to climate impacts in hydrology, agriculture, ecology, energy demand, and human health and comfort. Nonetheless humidity is not available in some widely-used archives of statistically downscaled climate projections for the western U.S. In this work the Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) statistical downscaling method is used to downscale specific humidity to a 1°/16° grid over the conterminous U.S. and the results compared to observations. LOCA reproduces observed monthly climatological values with a mean error of ~0.5 % and RMS error of ~2 %. Extreme (1-day in 1- and 20-years) maximum values (relevant to human health and energy demand) are within ~5 % of observed, while extreme minimum values (relevant to agriculture and wildfire) are within ~15 %. The asymmetry between extreme maximum and minimum errors is largely due to residual errors in the bias correction of extreme minimum values. The temporal standard deviations of downscaled daily specific humidity values have a mean error of ~1 % and RMS error of ~3 %. LOCA increases spatial coherence in the final downscaled field by ~13 %, but the downscaled coherence depends on the spatial coherence in the data being downscaled, which is not addressed by bias correction. Temporal correlations between daily, monthly, and annual time series of the original and downscaled data typically yield values >0.98. LOCA captures the observed correlations between temperature and specific humidity even when the two are downscaled independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abatzoglou JT (2012) Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.3413

    Google Scholar 

  • Abatzoglou JT, Brown TJ (2012) A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications. Int J Climatol 32:772–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TJ, Hall BL, Westerling AL (2004) The impact of twenty-first century climate change on wildland fire danger in the western United States: An applications perspective. Clim Change 62:365–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, Curtis J, Pasteris PA (2008) Physiographically-sensitive mapping of temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend AD (1995) PGEN—an integrated model of leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, and conductance. Ecol Model 77:233–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gent PR, Danabasoglu G, Donner LJ, Holland MM, Hunke EC, Jayne SR, Lawrence DM, Neale RB, Rasch PJ, Vertenstein M, Worley PH, Yang Z-L, Zhang M (2011) The community climate system model version 4. J Clim 24:4973–4991. doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann E, Pruitt T, Clark MP, Brekke L, Arnold JR, Raff DA, Rasmussen RM (2014) An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States. Water Resour Res 50:7167–7186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo HG, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2008). Downscaling with constructed analogues: daily precipitation and temperature fields over the United States. CEC PIER Project Report CEC-500-2007-123

  • Klein WH, Glahn HR (1974) Forecasting local weather by means of model output statistics. Bull Amer Meteorolol Soc 55:1217–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence DM et al (2011) Parameterization improvements and functional and structure advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 3:M03001. doi:10.1029/2011MS000045

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Sheffield J, Wood EF (2010) Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching. J Geophys Res Atmos. doi:10.1029/2009JD012882

    Google Scholar 

  • Livneh B, Rosenberg EA, Lin C, Nijssen B, Mishra V, Andreadis K, Maurer EP, Lettenmaier DP (2013). A long-term hydrologically based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States: updates and extensions. J Clim 26:9384–9392

  • Lovejoy S, Schertzer D, Allaire VC (2008) The remarkable wide range spatial scaling of TRMM precipitation. Atmos Res 90:10–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun D, Wetterrhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ et al (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change: recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys 48:RG3003. doi:10.1029/2009RG000314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP, Hidalgo HG, Das T, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2010) The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1125–1138. doi:10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP, Brekke L, Pruitt T, Thrasher B, Long J, Duffy PB, Dettinger MD, Cayan D, Arnold J (2014) An enhanced archive facilitating climate impacts analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-1113-00126.00121

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelangeli P-A, Vrac M, Loukos H (2009) Probabilistic downscaling approaches: application to wind cumulative distribution functions. Geophys Res Lett 36:L11708. doi:10.1029/2009GL038401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y, Georgopoulou E, Lalas DP, Moschovits M, Karagiannis F, Papakonstantinou D (2006) Models for mid-term electricy demand forecasting incorporating weather influences. Energy 31:208–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell KE et al (2004) The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J Geophys Res D109:D07S90. doi:10.1029/2003JD003823

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky HA, Brier GW (1968) Some applications of statistics to meteorology. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DW, Westerling AL, Oyler J (2013) Future humidity trends over the western United States in the CMIP5 global climate models and variable infiltration capacity hydrological modeling system. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:1833–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Thrasher BL (2014) Statistical downscaling using Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA). J. Hydromet 15:2558–2585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Abatzoglou J, Hegewisch K (2015). Improved bias correction techniques for hydrological simulations of climate change. J Hydrometeorol. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-14-0236.1

  • Rothfusz LP (1990) The heat index ‘equation’ (or, more than you ever wanted to know about heat index). Technical attachment SR 90-23, scientific services division. NWS Southern Region Headquarters, Fort Worth

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummukainen M (2009) State-of-the-art with regional climate models. WIRES Clim Change 1:82–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman RG (1979) The assessment of sultriness. Part I: a temperature-humidity index based on human physiology and clothing science. J Appl Meteorol 18:861–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-1111-00094.00091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom EC (1959) The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PE, Thornton MM, Mayer BW, Wilhelmi N, Wei Y, Cook RB (2012). Daymet: daily surface weather on a 1 km grid for North America, 1980–2012. http://daymet.ornl.gov

  • Thrasher B, Maurer EP, McKellar C, Duffy PB (2012) Technical note: bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3309–3314. doi:10.5194/hess-16-3309-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Dool HM (1994) Searching for analogues, how long must we wait? Tellus 46A:314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW, Maurer EP, Kumar A, Lettenamier DP (2002) 2002: long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J Geophys Res D 107:4429. doi:10.1029/2001JD000659

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank a reviewer who made valuable suggestions that improved this work. This work was made possible by support from California Energy Commission, agreement #500-10-041, which is gratefully acknowledged. Additional support was provided by the NOAA California Nevada Applications Program (CNAP) RISA award NOAA NA11OAR4310150, and the Department of Interior’s (U.S. Geological Survey) Southwest Climate Science Center, grant USGS G12AC20518. Computational resources in partial support of this work were provided by the NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) collaborative through the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at Ames Research Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Climate, Atmospheric Sciences, and Physical Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0224, USA

    D. W. Pierce & D. R. Cayan

  2. U.S. Geological Survey, La Jolla, CA, USA

    D. R. Cayan

Authors
  1. D. W. Pierce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. R. Cayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. W. Pierce.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 886 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pierce, D.W., Cayan, D.R. Downscaling humidity with Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) over the conterminous United States. Clim Dyn 47, 411–431 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2845-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2845-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation