Dear Editor:
We appreciate the interest of Rojas-Medina and Moro in our recently published manuscript [1, 2]. They raise some important issues which definitely will require further clarification in the future. Indeed, desmoplastic glioma might not be such a benign lesion when we consider the clinical course in some instances which have been reported. This is even more true for those patients who presented with multiple lesions, either combined cranial and spinal lesions or with multiple cranial lesions only. While in some patients tumors remain stable or may even regress, there is a rapid progression of the tumor in others, and as demonstrated repeatedly, the patient may also succumb within a few months.
Another important issue is whether or not there is a primary lesion initially with subsequent secondary lesions or whether these tumors may indeed manifest in multifocal locations. There are arguments for both. We presume that the spinal tumors rather present seeding of the supratentorial tumors via CSF. Conversely, however, with regard to the nature of these tumors and their maldevelopmental features, simultaneous appearance at multiple cerebral sites is possible.
Furthermore, we would like to emphasize that according to recent observations, desmoplastic infantile gliomas often carry BRAF V600E mutations. Koelsche et al. [3] observed BRAF mutations in 3 out of 18 patients which was the case also in the patient published by us [1]. The availability of selective BRAF V600E inhibitors like vemurafenib or dabrafenib may open new therapeutical options for these patients. Remarkably, patients with anaplastic gangliogliomas and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas with BRAF V600E mutations may respond to such treatment [4–6].
Due to the rarity of these tumors, available information has been derived mainly from case reports or from small case series. Hopefully, this tumor entity will deserve more attention in the future and data from different centers may be pooled to obtain further information about the true nature of these unusual tumors.
References
Abuharbid G, Esmaeilzadeh M, Hartmann C, Hermann EJ, Krauss JK (2015) Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma with multiple intracranial and intraspinal localizations at presentation. Childs Nerv Syst 31:959–964
Rojas-Medina LM, Moro RC (2015) Multiple desmoplastic astrocytoma: a benign neoplasm? Childs Nerv Syst 31(11):2007–2008
Koelsche C, Sahm F, Paulus W, Mittelbronn M, Giangaspero F, Antonelli M, Meyer J, Lasitschka F, von Deimling A, Reuss D (2014) BRAF V600E expression and distribution in desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma/ganglioglioma. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 40:337–344
Rush S, Foreman N, Liu A (2013) Brainstem ganglioglioma successfully treated with vemurafenib. J Clin Oncol 31(10):159–160
Bautista F, Paci A, Minard-Colin V, Dufour C, Grill J, Lacroix L, Varlet P, Valteau-Couanet D, Geoerger B (2014) Vemurafenib in pediatric patients with BRAFV600E mutated high-grade gliomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61(6):1101–1103
del Bufalo F, Carai A, Figà-Talamanca L, Pettorini B, Mallucci C, Giangaspero F, Antonelli M, Badiali M, Moi L, Bianco G, Cacchione A, Locatelli F, Ferretti E, Mastronuzzi A (2014) Response of recurrent BRAFV600E mutated ganglioglioma to Vemurafenib as single agent. J Transl Med 12:356
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abuharbid, G., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Hartmann, C. et al. Multiple desmoplastic infantile gliomas—therapeutic challenges. Childs Nerv Syst 32, 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2958-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2958-1