Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Major clinical features of synostotic occipital plagiocephaly: mechanisms of cranial deformations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The clinical diagnosis of most common single-suture craniosynostosis is easily set, based on the stereotype of deformities and knowledge of the mechanisms of cranial deformations. However, synostosis of unilateral lambdoid suture, probably due to its lower incidence and similarity with other non-synostotic deformities affecting the posterior portion of the skull, makes its clinical diagnosis more difficult and imprecise. The aim of this study is to evaluate the most easily and accurate clinical characteristics to be recognized in the synostotic occipital plagiocephaly.

Methods

This study consisted of clinical evaluation of eight patients with synostotic occipital plagiocephaly, whose diagnosis was further corroborated by computed tomography.

Results

We identified the following: unilateral occipital flattening in eight out of eight patients (100 %), bulging of ipsilateral mastoid process in eight out of eight (100 %), “edge effect” of ipsilateral lambdoid suture in eight out of eight (100 %), inferior deviation of the ear in eight out of eight (100 %), “Dumbo” ears in eight out of eight (100 %), horizontal slant of the bimastoid line in seven out of eight (87.5 %), tilt of the head viewed from behind in seven out of eight (87.5 %), trapezoidal contour of the skull in top view in six out of eight (75 %), contralateral parietal bossing in six out of eight (75 %), and bossing of the contralateral forehead three out of eight (37.5 %).

Conclusions

The most important clinical features specific to the clinical diagnosis of synostotic occipital plagiocephaly, not present in the positional posterior plagiocephaly, were bulging of the ipsilateral mastoid process, edge effect of the synostotic lambdoid suture, tilt of the head, and slant of the bimastoid line viewed from behind, inferior deviation of the ear, and contralateral parietal bossing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. French LR, Jackson IT, Melton LJ (1990) A population-based study of craniosynostosis. J Clin Epidemiol 43:69–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang MH, Gruss JS, Clarren SK, Mouradian WE, Cunningham ML, Roberts TS, Loeser JD, Cornell CJ (1996) The differential diagnosis of posterior plagiocephaly: true lambdoid synostosis versus positional molding. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rekate HL (1998) Occipital plagiocephaly: a critical review of the literature. J Neurosurg 89:24–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shillito J Jr, Matson DD (1968) Craniosynostosis: a review of 519 surgical patients. Pediatrics 41:829–853

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shuper A, Merlob P, Grunebaum M et al (1985) The incidence of isolated craniosynostosis in the newborn infant. Am J Dis Child 139:85–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun P, Persing J (1999) Craniosynostosis. In: Albright L, Pollack I, Adelson D (eds) Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., New York, pp 219–242

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hutchison BL, Hutchison LA, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA (2004) Plagiocephaly and brachycephaly in the first two years of life: a prospective cohort study. Pediatrics 114:970–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mulliken JB, Vander Woude DL, Hansen M (1999) Analysis of posterior plagiocephaly: deformational versus synostotic. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:371–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fearon JA, Singh DJ, Beals SP, Yu JC (2007) The diagnosis and treatment of single-sutural synostoses: are computed tomographic scan necessary? Plast Reconstr Surg 120:132

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Kadlub N, Freitas RS, Persing J, Duncan C, Shin JH (2008) The misdiagnosis of craniosynostosis as deformational plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 19:132–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delashaw JB, Persing JA, Broaddus WC, Jane JA (1989) Cranial vault growth in craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 70:159–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruiz RL, Ritter AM, Turvey TA, Costello B, Ricalde P (2004) Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: diagnosis and contemporary surgical management. Oral and Maxillofaci Surg Clin N Am 16:447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muakkassa KF, Hoffman HJ, Hinton DR, Hendrick B, Humprherys RP, Ash J (1984) Lambdoid synostosis. Part 2: review of cases managed at the Hospital for Sick Children, 1972–1982. J Neurosurg 61:340–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertelsen TI (1958) The premature synostosis of the cranial sutures. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 51:1–176

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knudson HW, Flaherty RA (1960) Craniosynostosis. AJR 84:454–460

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pople IK, Sanford RA, Muhlbauer MS (1996) Clinical presentation and management of 100 infants with occipital plagiocephaly. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vander Kolk CA, Carson BS (1994) Lambdoid synostosis. Plast Clin North Am 21:575–584

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kane AA, Mitchell LE, Craven KP, Marsh JL (1996) Observations on a recent increase in plagiocephaly without synostosis. Pediatrics 97:877–885

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frush DP, Donnely LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Craft A, Parker L, Gonzalez AB (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. National Cancer Institute (2012) Radiation risks and pediatric computed tomography (CT): a guide for health care providers. Available at: www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes/radiation-risks-pediatric-ct. Reviewed July 6th, 2012. Accessed 1 Aug 2013

  23. Hall P, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D, Pedersen NP, Lagiou P, Ekbom A, Ingvar M, Lundell M, Granath F (2004) Effect of low doses of ionizing radiation in infancy on cognitive function in adulthood: Swedish population based cohort study. MNJ 328:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dias MS, Klein DM, Backstrom JW (1996) Occipital plagiocephaly: deformation or lambdoid synostosis? I. Morphometric analysis and results of unilateral lambdoid craniectomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 24:61–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roger GF (2011) Deformational plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and scaphocephaly. Part I: terminology, diagnosis, and etiopathogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 22:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ehret FW, Whelan MF, Ellenbogen RG, Cunningham ML, Gruss JS (2004) Differential diagnosis of the trapezoid-shaped head. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 41:13–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smart JM Jr, Reid RR, Sigh DJ, Bartlett SP (2007) True lambdoid craniosynostosis: long-term results of surgical and conservative therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:993–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. David DJ, Menard RM (2000) Occipital plagiocephaly. Br J Plast Surg 53:367–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin KY, Polin RS, Gampper T, Jane JA (1997) Occipital flattening in the infant skull. Neurosurg Focus 15:2e4

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smartt JM, Elliott RM, Reid RR, Bartlett SP (2011) Analysis of differences in the cranial base and facial skeleton of patients with lambdoid synostosis and deformational plagiocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:303–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Authors received no financial support for this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Hamilton Matushita, Daniel Dante Cardeal & Fernanda Gonçalves de Andrade

  2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Craniofacial Unit, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Nivaldo Alonso

  3. Rua Barata Ribeiro 237, Cj 43/44/46, Bela Vista, São Paulo, 01308-000, Brazil

    Hamilton Matushita

Authors
  1. Hamilton Matushita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nivaldo Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Dante Cardeal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernanda Gonçalves de Andrade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamilton Matushita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matushita, H., Alonso, N., Cardeal, D.D. et al. Major clinical features of synostotic occipital plagiocephaly: mechanisms of cranial deformations. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 1217–1224 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2414-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2414-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation