Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis

  • Special Annual Issue
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to present a 16-year experience of treating sagittal synostosis with endoscopic-assisted techniques and postoperative cranial orthotic therapy. In 1996, we introduced the use of endoscopes for the management of sagittal synostosis in four young infants. During the subsequent years, we have treated a total of 256 patients with great success and long-term follow-up. Presented herein are the techniques and results of such clinical experience.

Methods

A total of 256 patients with sagittal synostosis have been treated between May 1996 and April 2012. There were 187 males and 69 females. Mean age at time of surgery was 3.9 months. A wide-vertex craniectomy with bilateral barrel stave osteotomies of the temporal and parietal bones using small scalp incisions and endoscopic viewing techniques was performed. Instruments have been developed to assist with the operation. All patients were placed in postoperative molding cranial orthosis.

Results

Mean estimated blood loss was 27 cc. Mean transfusion rate was 7 %. Mean surgical time was 57 min. Mean length of stay was 1.1 days. Using cephalic index (CI) as an anthropometric measurement to judge head shape, our results were classified as excellent (CI > 80), good (CI 80–70), or poor (CI < 70). A total of 87 % were classified as excellent, 9 % as good, and 4 % as poor.

Conclusions

Endoscopic-assisted management of sagittal synostosis is a safe, efficacious, and excellent option for treating this condition with long-lasting, superb results. It is associated with minimal morbidity and complications and improved results over traditional procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amm CA, Denny AD (2005) Correction of sagittal synostosis using foreshortening and lateral expansion of the cranium activated by gravity: surgical technique and postoperative evolution. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:723–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boop FA, Chadduck WM, Shewmake K, Teo C (1996) Outcome analysis of 85 patients undergoing the pi procedure for correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 85:50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greene CS Jr, Winston KR (1988) Treatment of scaphocephaly with sagittal craniectomy and biparietal morcellation. Neurosurgery 23:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jane JA, Edgerton MT, Futrell JW, Park TS (1978) Immediate correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 49:705–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jimenez DF, Barone CM (2000) Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, “barrel-stave” osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the early management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 9(3):e2, www.neurosurgery.org/focus/sep00/9_3_nsf_toc.html

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jimenez DF, Barone CM, Cartwright C, Baker L (2002) Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy. Pediatrics 110:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jimenez DF, Barone CM, McGee ME, Cartwright CC, Baker CL (2004) Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg (Pediatrics 5) 100:407–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Komuro Y, Ynai A, Hayashi A, Nakanishi H, Miyajima M, Arai H (2005) Cranial reshaping employing distraction and contraction in the treatment of sagittal synostosis. Br J Plast Surg 58:196–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchac D, Renier D, Broumand S (1994) Timing of treatment of craniosynostosis and faciocraniosynostosis: a 20 year experience. Br J Plast Surg 47:211–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Renier D, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D (2000) Management of craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 16:645–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shillito J (1992) A plea for early operation for craniosynostosis. Surg Neurol 37:182–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shillito J, Matson DD (1968) Craniosynostosis: a review of 519 surgical patients. Pediatrics 41:829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tullous MW, Henry MN, Wang PTH, Vollmer DG, Auber AE, Mancuso PA (2001) Multiple-revolution spiral osteotomy for cranial reconstruction. J Neurosurg 94:671–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Volmer DG, Jane JA, Park TS, Persing JA (1984) Varients of sagittal synostosis: strategies for surgical correction. J of Neurosurg 61:557–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David F. Jimenez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jimenez, D.F., Barone, C.M. Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 28, 1333–1339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1768-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1768-y

Keywords

Navigation