Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with small coronary arteries (≤2.5 mm): outcomes of 3-year clinical follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with small coronary artery lesions are at increased risk for late cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention. It remains uncertain whether second-generation drug-eluting stents have an advantage over first-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with small vessel lesions. Our aim was to compare in the 3-year clinical impact between second-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in small vessel lesions. Four-hundred forty-four patients with small vessel lesions defined as reference diameter <2.5 mm were treated with EES (237 patients, 265 lesions) or SES (207 patients, 220 lesions) and completed 3-year follow-up. We compared the major adverse clinical events (MACE) between the two groups. EES had no significant impact on the MACE rate compared with SES (4.6 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.14). No significant differences were observed in the individual components of cardiac death (1.7 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.78), myocardial infarction (1.3 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.12), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (2.3 vs. 4.6%, p = 0.13) in EES and SES, respectively. Stent thrombosis, however, was significantly less in the EES group than in the SES group (0.7 vs. 3.4%, HR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.38–0.88, p < 0.05). EES implantation did not significantly impact 3-year MACE rates compared to SES implantation in small vessel lesions. A significant reduction in the overall rate of stent thrombosis was observed in recipients of EES. While the SES group showed increasing rates of late and very late thrombosis, the EES group did not. EES offers a safe and effective treatment for small vessel lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schunkert H, Harrell L, Palacios IF (1999) Implications of small reference vessel diameter in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:40–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Hadamitzky M, Dirschinger J, Schomig A (1998) Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation 98:1875–1880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jabara R, Gradman M, Chen JP, King SB III, Gadesam R, Chronos NA (2009) Clinical and angiographic features of small vessel stenting in the drug-eluting stent era. Clin Cardiol 32:E40–E45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Kutys R, Skorija K, Gold HK, Virmani R (2006) Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:193–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakazawa G, Yazdani SK, Finn AV, Vorpahl M, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R (2010) Pathological findings at bifurcation lesions: the impact of flow distribution on atherosclerosis and arterial healing after stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1679–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheiban I, Villata G, Bollati M, Sillano D, Lotrionte M, Biondi-Zoccai G (2008) Next-generation drug-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: focus on everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V). Vasc Health Risk Manag 4:31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Serruys PW, Ruygrok P, Neuzner J, Piek JJ, Seth A, Schofer JJ, Richardt G, Wiemer M, Carrié D, Thuesen L, Boone E, Miquel-Herbert K, Daemen J (2006) A randomized comparison of an everolimus-eluting coronary stent with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent:the SPIRIT II trial. Eurointervention 2:286–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Planer D, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, Kedhi E, Fahy M, Xu K, Serruys PW, Stone GW (2011) Comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute and stable coronary syndromes: pooled results from the SPIRIT (a clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system) and COMPARE (a trial of everolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in daily practice) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1104–1115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Turco MA, Ormiston JA, Popma JJ, Hall JJ, Mann T, Cannon LA, Webster MW, Mishkel GJ, O’Shaughnessy CD, McGarry TF, Mandinov L, Dawkins KD, Baim DS (2008) Reduced risk of restenosis in small vessels and reduced risk of myocardial infarction in long lesions with the new thin-strut TAXUS Liberte stent: one-year results from the TAXUS ATLAS program. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1:699–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartorelli AL, Serruys PW, Miquel-Hébert K, Yu S, Pierson W, Stone GW, Investigators SPIRITIISPIRITIII (2010) An everolimus-eluting stent versus a paclitaxeleluting stent in small vessel coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:60–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cannon LA, Kereiakes DJ, Mann T, Popma JJ, Mooney MR, Mishkel GJ, Lee TC, Wilson BH, Stuckey TD, Orlow S, McGarry T, Ring ME, Kellett MA, Underwood P, Dawkins KD (2011) A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of TAXUS Element paclitaxel eluting coronary stent implantation for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions in small vessels: the PERSEUS Small Vessel Trial. Eurointervention 6:920–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baber U, Mehran R, Sharma SK, Brar S, Yu J, Suh JW, Kim HS, Park SJ, Kastrati A, de Waha A, Krishnan P, Moreno P, Sweeny J, Kim MC, Suleman J, Pyo R, Wiley J, Kovacic J, Kini AS, Dangas GD (2011) Impact of the everolimus-eluting stent on stent thrombosis: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1569–1577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Fusaro M, Amoroso N, Attubato MJ, Feit F, Bhatt DL, Slater J (2012) Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117,762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials. Circulation 125:2873–2891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Palmerini T, Kirtane AJ, Serruys PW, Smits PC, Kedhi E, Kereiakes D, Sangiorgi D, Bacchi Reggiani L, Kaiser C, Kim HS, De Waha A, Ribichini F, Stone GW (2012) Stent thrombosis with everolimus-eluting stents: meta-analysis of comparative randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5:357–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hermiller JB, Fergus T, Pierson W, Su X, Sood P, Sudhir K, Stone GW (2009) Clinical and angiographic comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in small coronary arteries: a post hoc analysis of the SPIRIT III randomized trial. Am Heart J 158:1005–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ito H, Hermiller JB, Yaqub M, Newman W, Sood P, Wang JC, Cannon L, Maddux JE, Sudhir K, Stone GW (2011) Performance of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in small vessels: results from the SPIRIT III and SPIRIT IV clinical trials. J Interv Cardiol 24:505–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW, Academic Research Consortium (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115:2344–2351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kandzari D, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, O’Shaughnessy C, Ball MW, Turco M, Applegate RJ, Gurbel PA, Midei MG, Badre SS, Mauri L, Thompson KP, LeNarz LA, Kuntz RE, Investigators ENDEAVORIII (2006) Comparison of zotralimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. ENDEAVOR III trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2440–2447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Valgimigli M, Garcia-Garcia HM, Ong AT, Aoki J, van Mieghem CA, Tsuchida K, Sianos G, McFadden E, van der Giessen WJ, van Domburg R, de Feyter P, Serruys PW (2005) One year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of very small vessels using 2.25 mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a comparison between the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries. J Invasive Cardiol 17:409–412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehilli J, Dibra A, Kastrati A, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Schömig A, Intracoronary Drug-Eluting Stenting to Abrogate Restenosis in Small Arteries (ISAR-SMART 3) Study Investigators (2006) Randomised trial of paclitaxel and sirolimus-eluting stents in small coronary vessels. Eur Heart J 27:260–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park KH, Park SW, Hong MK, Kim YH, Lee BK, Park DW, Choi BR, Kim MJ, Park KM, Lee CW, Cheong SS, Kim JJ, Park SJ (2006) Comparison of the effectiveness of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for small coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67:589–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Togni M, Eber S, Widmer J, Billinger M, Wenaweser P, Cook S, Vogel R, Seiler C, Eberli FR, Maier W, Corti R, Roffi M, Lüscher TF, Garachemani A, Hess OM, Wandel S, Meier B, Jüni P, Windecker S (2007) Impact of vessel size on outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a sub-group analysis of the SIRTAX trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1123–1131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanimoto S, Daemen J, Tsuchida K, García-García HM, de Jaegere P, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW (2007) Two-year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of small vessels using 2.25 mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: insight into the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:94–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitabata H, Loh JP, Sardi GL, Badr S, Dvir D, Barbash IM, Pendyala LK, Minha S, Torguson R, Chen F, Satler LF, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Waksman R (2013) Comparison of long-term outcomes between everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in small vessels. Am J Cardiol 111:973–978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Serruys PW, Ong AT, Piek JJ, Neumann FJ, van der Giessen WJ, Wiemer M, Zeiher A, Grube E, Haase J, Thuesen L, Hamm C, Otto-Terlouw PC (2005) A randomized comparison of a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent with a bare metal coronary stent: the SPIRIT first trial. Eurointervention 1:58–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin JC, Tiong SL, Chen CY (2000) Surface characterization and platelet adhesion studies on fluorocarbons prepared by plasma-induced graft polymerization. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 11:701–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Joner M, Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Quee SC, Coleman L, Acampado E, Wilson PS, Skorija K, Cheng Q, Xu X, Gold HK, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R (2008) Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:333–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chin-Quee SL, Hsu SH, Nguyen-Ehrenreich KL, Tai JT, Abraham GM, Pacetti SD, Chan YF, Nakazawa G, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Ding NN, Coleman LA (2010) Endothelial cell recovery, acute thrombogenicity, and monocyte adhesion and activation on fluorinated copolymer and phosphorylcholine polymer stent coatings. Biomaterials 31:648–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kolandaivelu K, Swaminathan R, Gibson WJ, Kolachalama VB, Nguyen-Ehrenreich KL, Giddings VL, Coleman L, Wong GK, Edelman ER (2011) Stent thrombogenicity early in high-risk interventional settings is driven by stent design and deployment and protected by polymer-drug coatings. Circulation 123:1400–1409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sabaté M, Brugaletta S, Cequier A, Iñiguez A, Serra A, Hernádez-Antolín R, Mainar V, Valgimigli M, Tespili M, den Heijer P, Bethencourt A, Vázquez N, Backx B, Serruys PW (2014) The EXAMINATION trial (Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction): 2-year results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Della Riva D, Stettler C, Sangiorgi D, D’Ascenzo F, Kimura T, Briguori C, Sabatè M, Kim HS, De Waha A, Kedhi E, Smits PC, Kaiser C, Sardella G, Marullo A, Kirtane AJ, Leon MB, Stone GW (2012) Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis. Lancet 379:1393–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideki Yano.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Everolimus-eluting stent with small vessel lesion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yano, H., Horinaka, S., Ishikawa, M. et al. Efficacy of everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with small coronary arteries (≤2.5 mm): outcomes of 3-year clinical follow-up. Heart Vessels 32, 796–803 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0937-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0937-4

Keywords

Navigation