Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to compare prospectively the differences of clinical outcomes being associated with a specific femoral closure (FC) compared to a radial compression (RC) device following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This single-center, prospective observational study included consecutively 400 patients either treated by a specific FC (Angio-Seal™, St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN) or RC (TR Band®, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) device following PCI. The primary outcome was to evaluate overall, access site and non-access site bleedings, the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurring within 30 days of follow-up. 200 patients in each group (FC and RC group) were enrolled following PCI. The prevalence of overall bleedings was 56% in FC and 37% in RC group (p = 0.001). Access site bleedings were significantly higher in the FC (50%) compared to the RC (30%) group (p = 0.001). Most common type of access site bleeding consisted of hematomas (FC 45% vs. RC 27%, p = 0.001). Of these, intermediate and large hematomas were significantly higher in the FC group (p < 0.05). Surgical interventions following device-related bleedings were uncommon in both groups. No significant differences of MACE were observed in both treatment groups. Despite the use of a vascular closure device, the femoral arterial access is still associated with a higher rate of access site bleedings, consisting mostly of intermediate to large hematomas. No differences of MACE were found between FC versus RC following PCI at 30 days. Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02455661).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehran R, Pocock S, Nikolsky E, Dangas GD, Clayton T, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Feit F, Manoukian SV, White H, Bertrand M, Ohman EM, Parise H, Lansky AJ, Lincoff AM, Stone GW (2011) Impact of bleeding on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention results from a patient-level pooled analysis of the REPLACE-2 (randomized evaluation of PCI linking angiomax to reduced clinical events), ACUITY (acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy), and HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:654–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S (2006) Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 114:774–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manoukian SV, Feit F, Mehran R, Voeltz MD, Ebrahimi R, Hamon M, Dangas GD, Lincoff AM, White HD, Moses JW, King SB 3rd, Ohman EM, Stone GW (2007) Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1362–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, Dotzer F, ten Berg J, Bollwein H, Graf I, Ibrahim M, Pache J, Seyfarth M, Schuhlen H, Dirschinger J, Berger PB, Schomig A, Intracoronary S, Antithrombotic: Regimen Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 Trial I (2006) Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial. JAMA 295:1531–1538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moscucci M, Fox KA, Cannon CP, Klein W, Lopez-Sendon J, Montalescot G, White K, Goldberg RJ (2003) Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J 24:1815–1823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirtane AJ, Piazza G, Murphy SA, Budiu D, Morrow DA, Cohen DJ, Peterson E, Lakkis N, Herrmann HC, Palabrica TM, Gibson CM, Group TS (2006) Correlates of bleeding events among moderate- to high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with eptifibatide: observations from the PROTECT-TIMI-30 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2374–2379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kinnaird T, Anderson R, Hill J, Thomas M (2009) Bleeding during percutaneous intervention: tailoring the approach to minimise risk. Heart 95:15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guenancia C, Stamboul K, Hachet O, Yameogo V, Garnier F, Gudjoncik A, Cottin Y, Lorgis L (2016) Clinical effectiveness of the systematic use of the GRACE scoring system (in addition to clinical assessment) for ischaemic outcomes and bleeding complications in the management of NSTEMI compared with clinical assessment alone: a prospective study. Heart Vessels 31:897–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Canos DA, Gevorkian N, Pinnow EE, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Weissman NJ, Lindsay J, Fuchs S (2003) Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 92:930–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verheugt FW, Steinhubl SR, Hamon M, Darius H, Steg PG, Valgimigli M, Marso SP, Rao SV, Gershlick AH, Lincoff AM, Mehran R, Stone GW (2011) Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao SV, O’Grady K, Pieper KS, Granger CB, Newby LK, Van de Werf F, Mahaffey KW, Califf RM, Harrington RA (2005) Impact of bleeding severity on clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 96:1200–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone PA, Campbell JE (2012) Complications related to femoral artery access for transcatheter procedures. Vasc Endovascular Surg 46:617–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin TH, Lai WT, Kuo CT, Hwang JJ, Chiang FT, Chang SC, Chang CJ (2015) Additive effect of in-hospital TIMI bleeding and chronic kidney disease on 1-year cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: data from Taiwan Acute Coronary Syndrome Full Spectrum Registry. Heart Vessels 30:441–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, Neyses L, Fraser DG, de Belder M, Ludman PF, Nolan J, British Cardiovascular Intervention S, the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes R (2013) Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:698–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S, Investigators R (2012) Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:2490–2499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R (1997) A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1269–1275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, Vassanelli C, Zardini P, Louvard Y, Hamon M (2004) Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hon LQ, Ganeshan A, Thomas SM, Warakaulle D, Jagdish J, Uberoi R (2009) Vascular closure devices: a comparative overview. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 38:33–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratib K, Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Bhatia G, Routledge H, De Belder M, Ludman PF, Fraser D, Nolan J, British Cardiovascular Intervention S, the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes R (2015) Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:20–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sciahbasi A, Fischetti D, Picciolo A, Patrizi R, Sperduti I, Colonna G, Summaria F, Montinaro A, Lioy E (2009) Transradial access compared with femoral puncture closure devices in percutaneous coronary procedures. Int J Cardiol 137:199–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Behnes M, Unsal M, Hoffmann U, Fastner C, El-Battrawy I, Lang S, Mashayekhi K, Lehmann R, Borggrefe M, Akin I (2015) Design and rationale of the femoral closure versus radial compression devices related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) study. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 9:97–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Authors/Task Force m, Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 35:2541–2619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M (2008) Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72:335–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H (2011) Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 123:2736–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vavalle JP, Clare R, Chiswell K, Rao SV, Petersen JL, Kleiman NS, Mahaffey KW, Wang TY (2013) Prognostic significance of bleeding location and severity among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:709–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bovill EG, Terrin ML, Stump DC, Berke AD, Frederick M, Collen D, Feit F, Gore JM, Hillis LD, Lambrew CT et al (1991) Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI). Phase II Trial. Ann Intern Med 115:256–265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M, Hakeem A, Mills JD, Palmer ND, Perry RA, Morris JL (2010) A randomized comparison of TR band and radistop hemostatic compression devices after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:660–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tavris DR, Wang Y, Jacobs S, Gallauresi B, Curtis J, Messenger J, Resnic FS, Fitzgerald S (2012) Bleeding and vascular complications at the femoral access site following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): an evaluation of hemostasis strategies. J Invasive Cardiol 24:328–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Andrade PB, Mattos LA, Rinaldi FS, Bienert IC, Barbosa RA, Labrunie A, Tebet M, Esteves V, Abizaid A,Sousa AR (2016) Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv [Epub ahead of print]

  30. Amlani S, Nadarajah T, Afzal R, Pal-Sayal R, Eikelboom JW, Natarajan MK (2010) Mortality and morbidity following a major bleed in a registry population with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis 30:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stone GW, White HD, Ohman EM, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Pocock SJ, Ware JH, Feit F, Colombo A, Manoukian SV, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Moses JW, Acute C, Urgent Intervention Triage strategy trial i (2007) Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial. Lancet 369:907–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Fastner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

C. Fastner and M. Behnes contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fastner, C., Behnes, M., Ünsal, M. et al. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study. Heart Vessels 32, 520–530 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0901-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0901-3

Keywords

Navigation