Abstract
High-resolution numerical simulation data of a rainstorm triggering debris flow in Sichuan Province of China simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model were used to study the dominant cloud microphysical processes of the torrential rainfall. The results showed that: (1) In the strong precipitation period, particle sizes of all hydrometeors increased, and mean-mass diameters of graupel increased the most significantly, as compared with those in the weak precipitation period; (2) The terminal velocity of raindrops was the strongest among all hydrometeors, followed by graupel’s, which was much smaller than that of raindrops. Differences between various hydrometeors’ terminal velocities in the strong precipitation period were larger than those in the weak precipitation period, which favored relative motion, collection interaction and transformation between the particles. Absolute terminal velocity values of raindrops and graupel were significantly greater than those of air upward velocity, and the stronger the precipitation was, the greater the differences between them were; (3) The orders of magnitudes of the various hydrometeors’ sources and sinks in the strong precipitation period were larger than those in the weak precipitation period, causing a difference in the intensity of precipitation. Water vapor, cloud water, raindrops, graupel and their exchange processes played a major role in the production of the torrential rainfall, and there were two main processes via which raindrops were generated: abundant water vapor condensed into cloud water and, on the one hand, accretion of cloud water by rain water formed rain water, while on the other hand, accretion of cloud water by graupel formed graupel, and then the melting of graupel formed rain water.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, C. P., H. Z. Feng, and J. Chen, 2010: Application of Sichuan heavy rainfall ensemble prediction probability products based on Bayesian method. Meteorological Monthly, 36(5), 32–39. (in Chinese)
Chen, Y. R., and Y. Q. Li, 2013: Characteristics of mesoscale convective system and its effects on short-time severe rainfall in Sichuan Basin during 21–22 July 2012. Meteorological Monthly, 39(7), 848–860. (in Chinese)
Colle, B. A., and Y. G. Zeng, 2004: Bulk microphysical sensitivities within the MM5 for orographic precipitation. Part II: Impact of barrier width and freezing level. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2802–2815.
Crochet, P., T. Jóhannesson, T. Jónsson, O. Siguresson, H. Björnsson, F. Pálsson, and I. Barstad, 2007: Estimating the spatial distribution of precipitation in Iceland using a linear model of orographic precipitation. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 1285–1306.
Ge, J. J., W. Zhong, N. Du, and H. C. Lu, 2008: Numerical simulation and analysis of Sichuan rainstorm under terrain influence. Scientia Meteorologica Sinica, 28(2), 176–183. (in Chinese)
He, Y., and G. P. Li, 2013: Numerical experiments on influence of Tibetan Plateau on persistent heavy rain in South China. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 37(4), 933–944. (in Chinese)
Li, A. T., and H. R. He, 2011: Impact of different cloud microphysical parameterization schemes on the numeric simulation results of “8.8” rainstorm process in Zhouqu. Meteorology and Disaster Reduction Research, 34(3), 9–16. (in Chinese)
Li, Q., X. P. Cui, and J. Cao, 2014: The observational analysis and numerical simulation of a heavy rain event in Sichuan Province. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1401.13255. (in Chinese)
Liao, J. B., X. M. Wang, B. C. Xia, T. J. Wang, and Z. M. Wang, 2012: The effects of different physics and cumulus parameterization schemes in WRF on heavy rainfall simulation in PRD. J. Trop. Meteor., 28(4), 461–470. (in Chinese)
Lu, P., R. C. Yu, and T. J. Zhou, 2009: Numerical simulation on the sensitivity of heavy rainfall over the western Sichuan Basin to initial water vapor condition. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 33(2), 241–250. (in Chinese)
Ma, Y. Z., C. G. Lu, and S. T. Gao, 2012: The effects of different microphysical schemes in WRF on a heavy rainfall in North China during 18-19 August 2010. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 36(4), 835–850. (in Chinese)
Maussion, F., D. Scherer, R. Finkelnburg, J. Richters, W. Yang, and T. D. Yao, 2010: WRF simulation of a precipitation event over the Tibetan Plateau, China—An assessment using remote sensing and ground observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 15, 1795–1817.
Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005a: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3051–3064.
Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005b: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed threemoment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3065–3081.
Sawyer, J. S., 1956: The physical and dynamical problems of orographic rain. Weather, 11(12), 375–381.
Smith, B. L., S. E. Yuter, P. J. Neiman, and D. E. Kingsmill, 2010: Water vapor fluxes and orographic precipitation over Northern California associated with a landfalling atmospheric river. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 74–100.
Smith, R. B., and I. Barstad, 2004: A linear theory of orographic precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1377–1391.
Smith, R. B., and J. P. Evans, 2007: Orographic precipitation and water vapor fractionation over the Southern Andes. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 3–19.
Wang, C. X., S. T. Gao, L. Liang, and Y. Z. Ma, 2013: Diagnostic analysis of dynamical parameters for Sichuan rainstorm influenced by terrain. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 37(5), 1099–1110. (in Chinese)
Wang, W., J. Liu, and X. J. Cai, 2011: Impact of mesoscale gravity waves on a heavy rainfall event in the east side of the Tibetan Plateau. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 34(6), 737–747. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, Y., Cui, X. Dominant cloud microphysical processes of a torrential rainfall event in Sichuan, China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 32, 389–400 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-4066-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-4066-7