Skip to main content
Log in

The time and regime dependencies of sensitive areas for tropical cyclone prediction using the CNOP method

  • Published:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the time and regime dependencies of sensitive areas identified by the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method for forecasts of two typhoons. Typhoon Meari (2004) was weakly nonlinear and is herein referred to as the linear case, while Typhoon Matsa (2005) was strongly nonlinear and is herein referred to as the nonlinear case.

In the linear case, the sensitive areas identified for special forecast times when the initial time was fixed resembled those identified for other forecast times. Targeted observations deployed to improve a special time forecast would thus also benefit forecasts at other times. In the nonlinear case, the similarities among the sensitive areas identified for different forecast times were more limited. The deployment of targeted observations in the nonlinear case would therefore need to be adapted to achieve large improvements for different targeted forecasts. For both cases, the closer the forecast time, the higher the similarities of the sensitive areas.

When the forecast time was fixed, the sensitive areas in the linear case diverged continuously from the verification area as the forecast period lengthened, while those in the nonlinear case were always located around the initial cyclones. The deployment of targeted observations to improve a special forecast depends strongly on the time of deployment.

An examination of the efficiency gained by reducing initial errors within the identified sensitive areas confirmed these results. In general, the greatest improvement in a special time forecast was obtained by identifying the sensitive areas for the corresponding forecast time period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ancell, B. C., and C. F. Mass, 2006: Structure, growth rates, and tangent linear accuracy of adjoint sensitivities with respect to horizontal and vertical resolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2971–2988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. H., and Z. Toth, 1999: Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1748–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. H., B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birgin, E. G., J. E. Martinez, and R. Marcos, 2001: Algorithm 813: SPG—Software for convex-constrained optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 27, 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizza, R., and A. Montani, 1999: Targeting observations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2965–2985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizza, R., C. Cardinali, G. Kelly, and J. Thépaut, 2007: The value of targeted observations. Part II: The value of observations taken in singular vectors-based target areas. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1817–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. Y., 2011: Observation system experiments for typhoon Nida (2004) using the CNOP method and DOTSTAR data. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 4, 118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1493–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W. S., and M. Mu, 2006: Investigating decadal variability of El Niño-Southern Oscillation asymmetry by conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. J. Geophys. Res., 111, Co7015, doi: 10.1029/2005JC003458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W. S., and R. Zhang, 2010: Is model parameter error related to a significant spring predictability barrier for El Niñno events? Results from a theoretical model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27(5), 1003–1013, doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9166-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, M., and R. M. Errico, 1995: Mesoscale predictability and the spectrum of optimal perturbations. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3475–3500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, T. M., and C. Snyder, 2002: Using improved background-error covariance from an ensemble Kalman filter for adaptive observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1552–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. M., M. C. Morgan, and R. E. Morss, 2004: Evolution of analysis error and adjoint-based sensitivities: Implications for adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 795–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. J., S. D. Aberson, C. H. Bishop, R. Buizza, M. S. Peng, and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: A comparison of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2354–2372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., and W. S. Duan, 2003: A new approach to studying ENSO predictability: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48, 747–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., and Z. N. Jiang, 2008: A new method to generate the initial perturbations in ensemble forecast: conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations. Chinese Science Bulletin, 53, 2062–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., L. Sun, and D. A. Hank, 2004: The sensitivity and stability of the ocean’s thermohaline circulation to finite amplitude perturbations. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 2305–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., H. L. Wang, and F. F. Zhou, 2007a: A preliminary application of Conditional Nonlinear Optimal Perturbation to adaptive observation. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci, 31, 1102–1112. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., H. Xu, and W. S. Duan, 2007b: A kind of initial errors related to “spring predictability barrier” for El Nino events in Zebiak-Cane model. Geophys. Res. Lett., doi: 10.1029/2006GL027412.

  • Mu, M., F. F. Zhou, and H. L. Wang, 2009: A method to identify the sensitive areas in targeting for tropical cyclone prediction: conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1623–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, X. H., and M. Mu, 2011a: A study on the reduction of forecast error variance by three adaptive observation approaches for tropical cyclone prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 2218–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, X. H., and M. Mu, 2011b: Influence of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations sensitivity on typhoon track forecasts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., doi: 10.1002/qj.902.

  • Rivier, O., G. Lapeyre, and O. Talagrand, 2008: Nonlinear generalization of singular vectors: behavior in a baroclinic unstable flow. J. Atmos. Sci, 65, 1896–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., M. Mu, D. J. Sun, and X. Y. Yin, 2005: Passive mechanism of decadal variation of thermohaline circulation. J. Geophys. Res., 110, C07025, doi: 10.1029/2005JC002897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A. D., and H. A. Dijkstra, 2008: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations of the double-gyre ocean circulation. Nonlinear Processes Geophysics, 15, 727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. C., J. H. Chen, P. H. Lin, and K. H. Chou, 2007: Targeted observations of tropical cyclone movement based on the adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2611–2626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. S., W. S. Duan, H. Xu, and M. Mu, 2009: Dynamics of nonlinear error growth and seasondependent predictability of El Niño events in the Zebiak-Cane model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, doi: 10.1002/qj.526.

  • Zhou, F. F., 2009: The application of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation to the tropical cyclone targeted observations. Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 126pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, F. F., and M. Mu, 2011: The impact of verification area design on tropical cyclone targeted observations based on the CNOP method. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28(5), 997–1010, doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0120-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, F. F., and M. Mu, 2012: The impact of horizontal resolution on the CNOP and on its identified sensitive areas for tropical cyclone predictions. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29, 36–46, doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-1003-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, X., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1997: Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-435 STR, 107pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feifan Zhou  (周菲凡).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, F., Mu, M. The time and regime dependencies of sensitive areas for tropical cyclone prediction using the CNOP method. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 29, 705–716 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1174-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1174-0

Key words

Navigation