Solving Non-Uniqueness in Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Using Multidendrograms
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In agglomerative hierarchical clustering, pair-group methods suffer from a problem of non-uniqueness when two or more distances between different clusters coincide during the amalgamation process. The traditional approach for solving this drawback has been to take any arbitrary criterion in order to break ties between distances, which results in different hierarchical classifications depending on the criterion followed. In this article we propose a variable-group algorithm that consists in grouping more than two clusters at the same time when ties occur. We give a tree representation for the results of the algorithm, which we call a multidendrogram, as well as a generalization of the Lance andWilliams’ formula which enables the implementation of the algorithm in a recursive way.
- ARNAU, V., MARS, S., and MARÍN, I. (2005), “Iterative Cluster Analysis of Protein Interaction Data,” Bioinformatics, 21(3), 364–378. CrossRef
- BACKELJAU, T., DE BRUYN, L., DE WOLF, H., JORDAENS, K., VAN DONGEN, S., and WINNEPENNINCKX, B. (1996), “Multiple UPGMA and Neighbor-Joining Trees and the Performance of Some Computer Packages,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13(2), 309–313.
- CORMACK, R.M. (1971), “A Review of Classification” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 134, 321–367. CrossRef
- GORDON, A.D. (1999), Classification (2nd ed.), London/Boca Raton, FL:Chapman & Hall/CRC.
- HART, G. (1983), “The Occurrence of Multiple UPGMA Phenograms,” in Numerical Taxonomy, ed. J. Felsenstein, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 254–258.
- LANCE, G.N., and WILLIAMS, W.T. (1966), “A Generalized Sorting Strategy for Computer Classifications,” Nature, 212, 218. CrossRef
- MACCUISH, J., NICOLAOU, C., and MACCUISH, N.E. (2001), “Ties in Proximity and Clustering Compounds,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41, 134–146. CrossRef
- MORGAN, B.J.T., and RAY, A.P.G. (1995), “Non-uniqueness and Inversions in Cluster Analysis,” Applied Statistics, 44(1), 117–134. CrossRef
- SNEATH, P.H.A., and SOKAL, R.R. (1973), Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
- SZÉKELY, G.J., and RIZZO, M.L. (2005), “Hierarchical Clustering via Joint Between-Within Distances: Extending Ward’s Minimum Variance Method,” Journal of Classification, 22, 151–183. CrossRef
- VAN DER KLOOT, W.A., SPAANS, A.M.J., and HEISER, W.J. (2005), “Instability of Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Due to Input Order of the Data: The Permu CLUSTER Solution,” Psychological Methods, 10(4), 468–476. CrossRef
- WARD, J.H., Jr. (1963), “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244. CrossRef
- Solving Non-Uniqueness in Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Using Multidendrograms
Journal of Classification
Volume 25, Issue 1 , pp 43-65
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Agglomerative methods
- Cluster analysis
- Hierarchical classification
- Lance and Williams’ formula
- Ties in proximity
- Industry Sectors