Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A rapidly settled closed-loop control for airfoil aerodynamics based on plasma actuation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation on the response of the slope seeking with extended Kalman filter (EKF) deployed in a closed-loop system for airfoil aerodynamics control. A novel dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuator was used to manipulate the flow around the NACA 0015 airfoil. Experiments were performed under different freestream velocities U , covering the chord Reynolds number Re from 4.4 × 104 to 7.7 × 104. Firstly, the advantages of applying this DBD plasma actuator (hereafter called sawtooth plasma actuator) on the airfoil were examined in an open-loop system at Re = 7.7 × 104. The sawtooth plasma actuator led to a delay in the stall angle α stall by 5° and an increase in the maximum lift coefficient \(C_{{{\text{L}}_{ \text{max} } }}\) by about 9 %. On the other hand, at the same input power, the traditional DBD plasma actuator managed a delay in α stall by only 3° and an increase in \(C_{{{\text{L}}_{ \text{max} } }}\) by about 3 %. Secondly, the convergence time t c of the lift force F L at Re from 4.4 × 104 to 7.7 × 104 was investigated for two closed-loop systems. It has been demonstrated that the t c was about 70 % less under the slope seeking with EKF than that under the conventional slope seeking with high-pass (HP) and low-pass (LP) filters at Re = 7.7 × 104. The reduction in t c was also observed at a different Re. Finally, the slope seeking with EKF showed excellent robustness over a moderate Re range; that is, the voltage amplitude determined by the control algorithm promptly responded to a change in Re, much faster than that of the conventional slope seeking with HP and LP filters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariyur KB, Krstić M (2004) Slope Seeking: a generalization of extremum seeking. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 18(1):1–22

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Becker R, King R, Petz R, Nitsche W (2007) Adaptive closed-loop separation control on a high-lift configuration using extremum seeking. AIAA J 45(6):1382–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benard N, Moreau E (2011) On the vortex dynamic of airflow reattachment forced by a single non-thermal plasma discharge actuator. Flow Turbul Combust 87:1–31

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Benard N, Jolibois J, Moreau E (2009a) Lift and drag performances of an axisymmetric airfoil controlled by plasma actuator. J Electrostat 67(2–3):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benard N, Mizuno A, Moreau E (2009b) A large-scale multiple dielectric barrier discharge actuator based on an innovative three-electrode design. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:235204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benard N, Moreau E, Griffin J, Cattafesta LN (2010) Slope seeking for autonomous lift improvement by plasma surface discharge. Exp Fluids 48(5):791–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho YC, Shyy W (2011) Adaptive flow control of low-Reynolds number aerodynamics using dielectric barrier discharge actuator. Prog Aerosp Sci 47(7):495–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis SS, Joslin RD, Seifert A, Theofilis V (2004) Issues in active flow control: theory, control, simulation, and experiment. Prog Aerosp Sci 40(4–5):237–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corke T, Jumper E, Post ML, Orlov D, McLaughlin T (2002) Application of weakly-ionized plasmas as wing flow-control devices. AIAA Paper 2002-0350

  • Dong B, Bauchire JM, Pouvesle JM, Magnier P, Hong D (2008) Experimental study of a DBD surface discharge for the active control of subsonic airflow. J Phys D Appl Phys 41:155201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enloe CL, McLaughlin TE, VanDyken RD, Kachner KD, Jumper EJ, Corke TC (2004) Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actuator: geometric effects. AIAA J 42(3):595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erfani R, Zare-Behtash H, Hale C, Kontis K (2015) Development of DBD plasma actuators: the double encapsulated electrode. Acta Astronaut 109:132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte M, Jolibois J, Pons J, Moreau E, Touchard G, Cazalens M (2007) Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control. Exp Fluids 43(6):917–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbert G, Moeck JP, Paschereit CO, King R (2012) Advanced algorithms for gradient estimation in one- and two-parameter extremum seeking controllers. J Process Contr 22:700–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning L, Becker R, Feuerbach G, Muminovic R, King R, Brunn A, Nitsche W (2008) Extensions of adaptive slope-seeking for active flow control. Proc IMechE Part I J Syst Control Eng 222(5):309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskinson AR, Hershkowitz N, Ashpis DE (2008) Force measurements of single and double barrier DBD plasma actuators in quiescent air. J Phys D Appl Phys 41:245209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SC, Kim J (2008) Control and system identification of a separated flow. Phys Fluids 20(10):101509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joussot R, Leroy A, Weber R, Rabat H, Loyer S, Hong D (2013) Plasma morphology and induced airflow characterization of a DBD actuator with serrated electrode. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:125204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Bewley TR (2007) A linear systems approach to flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:383–417

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Kerr M, Beskok A, Jayasuriya S (2006) Frequency-domain based feedback control of flow separation using synthetic jets. Proceedings of the 2006 American control conference

  • King R, Becker R, Feuerbach G, Henning L, Petz R, Nitsche W, Lemke O, Neise W (2006) Adaptive flow control using slope seeking. 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation

  • Lissaman PBS (1983) Low-Reynolds-Number airfoils. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little J, Samimy M (2010) High-Lift airfoil separation with dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuation. AIAA J 48(12):2884–2898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi AJ, Bowles PO, Corke TC (2013) Closed-loop dynamic stall control using a plasma actuator. AIAA J 51(5):1130–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer E (1968) A note on the step response of high-pass filters. IEEE Trans Circ Theory 15(4):481–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau E (2007) Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:605–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastoor M, Henning L, Noack BR, King R, Tadmor G (2008) Feedback shear layer control for bluff body drag reduction. J Fluid Mech 608:161–196

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patel MP, Sowle ZH, Corke TC, He C (2007) Autonomous sensing and control of wing stall using a smart plasma slat. J Aircr 44(2):516–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post ML, Corke TC (2004) Separation control on high angle of attack airfoil using plasma actuators. AIAA J 42(11):2177–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post ML, Corke TC (2006) Separation control using plasma actuators: dynamic stall vortex control on oscillating airfoil. AIAA J 44(12):3125–3135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riherd M, Roy S (2013) Serpentine geometry plasma actuators for flow control. J Appl Phys 114:083303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberto S, Guillermo A (2006) Steady control of laminar separation over airfoils with plasma sheet actuators. J Electrostat 64(7–9):604–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JJ, Choi KS, Feng LH, Jukes TN, Whalley RD (2013) Recent developments in DBD plasma flow control. Prog Aerosp Sci 62:52–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CW, Rinoie K (2010) Bubble burst control using smart structure sensor actuators for stall suppression. J Aircr 47(4):1439–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JZ, Lu XY, Denny AG, Fan M, Wu JM (1998) Post-stall flow control on an airfoil by local unsteady forcing. J Fluid Mech 371:21–58

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

CW Wong wishes to acknowledge support given to him from Research Grants Council of Shenzhen Government through grants JCYJ20120613153244545 and JCYJ20130402100505796. Y Zhou wishes to acknowledge the financial support of CSIRO Chief Executive Office through the Distinguished Visiting Scientist program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. W. Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Wong, C.W., Wang, L. et al. A rapidly settled closed-loop control for airfoil aerodynamics based on plasma actuation. Exp Fluids 56, 158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2032-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2032-5

Keywords

Navigation