Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of use and patient characteristics: brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in octo- and nonagenarians

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Brachytherapy (BT) is a widely used treatment modality for elderly patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective

To describe the patterns of BT use in octo- and nonagenarians treated for localized PCa in the USA. We hypothesized that most individuals treated with BT should remain alive for at least 10 years. We also postulated that BT should ideally be administered as monotherapy.

Patients and methods

Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked database, 2701 octo- and nonagenarians treated with BT between 1992 and 2009 were identified. Cumulative incidence rates and smoothed cumulative incidence plots were used.

Results

In patients with low-risk characteristics, 40 % received BT alone; 27 % received BT combined with ADT; 19 % received BT and EBRT; and 14 % received BT combined with both ADT and EBRT. Of intermediate-to-high-risk patients, 19 % received BT alone; 16 % received BT combined with ADT; 19 % received BT combined with EBRT; and 45 % received BT together with ADT and EBRT. Overall survival rate was 79 and 47 % at 5 and 10 years.

Conclusions

Less than half of elderly treated with BT remain alive at 10 years of follow-up. Moreover, the vast majority of those individuals not only receives BT, but is also exposed to two or even three combined therapy modalities. These findings are worrisome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R et al (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):9–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jarosek SL et al (2015) Propensity-weighted long-term risk of urinary adverse events after prostate cancer surgery, radiation, or both. Eur Urol 67(2):273–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Warren JL et al (2002) Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 40(8Suppl):IV-3–IV-18

    Google Scholar 

  4. Penson DF et al (2001) Determining cause of death in prostate cancer: are death certificates valid? J Natl Cancer Inst 93(23):1822–1823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albertsen PC, Walters S, Hanley JA (2000) A comparison of cause of death determination in men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer who died in 1985 or 1995. J Urol 163(2):519–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klabunde CN et al (2000) Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 53(12):1258–1267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun M et al (2011) Racial disparities and socioeconomic status in men diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors: a survival analysis. Cancer 117(18):4277–4285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Droz JP et al (2014) Management of prostate cancer in older patients: updated recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol 15(9):e404–e414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Austenfeld MS, Thompson IM Jr, Middleton RG (1994) Meta-analysis of the literature: guideline development for prostate cancer treatment. American Urological Association Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel. J Urol 152(5 Pt 2):1866–1869

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson I et al (2007) Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 177(6):2106–2131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.

Ethical standard

This manuscript found approval by SEER-Medicare. The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Boehm.

Additional information

Roger Valdivieso and Katharina Boehm have contributed equally.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 53 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valdivieso, R., Boehm, K., Meskawi, M. et al. Patterns of use and patient characteristics: brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in octo- and nonagenarians. World J Urol 33, 1985–1991 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1553-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1553-0

Keywords

Navigation