Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pelvic floor muscle function is an independent predictor of outcome after retrourethral transobturator male sling procedure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of the retrourethral transobturator sling (RTS) on pelvic floor muscle function (PFMF) and whether preoperative PFMF is associated with RTS outcome.

Methods

Between May 2008 and December 2010, 59 consecutive men with postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PSUI) underwent PFMF assessment before RTS and 6 months thereafter in a prospective cohort study. The assessments included demographic and clinical characteristics, and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. PFMF was evaluated by digital rectal examination on the modified 6-point Oxford scale and by surface electromyography. The primary outcome measurement was success after RTS defined as PSUI cure with use of no or one dry “security” pad. For secondary outcome, PFMF, 1-h pad test, and impact of PSUI on QoL were evaluated. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

After 6-month follow-up, the cure, improvement (>50 % pad reduction) and failure rates were 50 % (29/58 patients), 24 % (14/58 patients) and 26 % (15/58 patients), respectively. Significant improvement of QoL, clinical and PFMF parameters occurred after RTS. On multivariate analysis, weak PFMF (OR 86.29) and greater muscle fatigue (OR 3.31) were significant independent predictors of RTS failure. The final model demonstrated good calibration (p = 0.882) and excellent discriminative ability (0.942, 95 % CI 0.883–1.0) to predict success after RTS.

Conclusions

PFMF improved significantly after RTS procedure. Higher muscle fatigue and weak PFMF were independent predictors of RTS failure. Digital rectal evaluation of PFMF is a simple and reliable clinical tool, which can be used by urologists in daily routine to predict the RTS outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence: 4th international consultation on incontinence, 4th edn. Health Publication, Plymouth, pp 35–111

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hubner W et al (2011) Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 59:985–996. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loughlin KR, Prasad MM (2010) Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol 183:871–877. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Bosch JLHR et al (2014) Guidelines on urinary incontinence. Uroweb. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/20%20Urinary%20Incontinence_LR.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2014

  5. Campbell SE, Glazener CM, Hunter KF, Cody JD, Moore KN (2012) Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001843. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001843.pub4

  6. Rehder P, Gozzi C (2007) Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 52:860–866. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rehder P, Webster G (2011) The AdVance® male sling: patient selection and workup. Eur Urol Suppl 10:390–394. doi:10.1016/j.eursup.2011.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cornu JN, Sebe P, Ciofu C, Peyrat L, Cussenot O, Haab F (2011) Mid-term evaluation of the transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: focus on prognostic factors. BJU Int 108:236–240. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09765.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soljanik I, Gozzi C, Becker AJ, Stief CG, Bauer RM (2012) Risk factors of treatment failure after retrourethral transobturator male sling. World J Urol 30:201–206. doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0671-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C et al (2009) Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eur Urol 56:928–933. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu JN, Gozzi C, Bauer RM (2012) Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol 62:140–145. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Roosen A et al (2013) Impact of the ‘repositioning test’ on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male sling implantation. Urol Int 90:334–338. doi:10.1159/000347123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zuckerman JM, Edwards B, Henderson K, Beydoun HA, McCammon KA (2014) Extended outcomes in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with a transobturator sling. Urology 83:939–945. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seckiner I, Yesilli C, Mungan NA, Aykanat A, Akduman B (2007) Correlations between the ICIQ-SF score and urodynamic findings. Neurourol Urodyn 26:492–494. doi:10.1002/nau.20389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP (1996) Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 47:67–71 (discussion 71–62)

  16. Dorey G (2007) A clinical overview of the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. Br J Nurs 16:1194–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dieperink KB, Johansen C, Hansen S et al (2013) The effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation: RePCa-a randomised study among primary prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer 109:3005–3013. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.679

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B et al (2005) Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 24:374–380. doi:10.1002/nau.20144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laycock J, Jerwood D (2001) Pelvic floor muscle assessment: the PERFECT scheme. Physiotherapy 87:631–642. doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(05)61108-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kowalik CG, Delong JM, Mourtzinos AP (2013) The adVance transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: subjective and objective outcomes with 3 years follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. doi:10.1002/nau.22539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Altman DG (1997) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Myers RP, Cahill DR, Kay PA et al (2000) Puboperineales: muscular boundaries of the male urogenital hiatus in 3D from magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 164:1412–1415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stafford RE, Mazzone SB, Ashton-Miller JA, Constantinou CE, Hodges PW (2014) Dynamics of male pelvic floor muscle contraction observed with transperineal ultrasound imaging differ between voluntary and evoked coughs. J Appl Physiol 116:953–960. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01225.2013

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan L, Tse V, Wang A (2013) Dynamic compression of the urethra—2D and 3D ultrasound imaging of the male transobturator sling with medium term follow-up. BJU Int 111(Suppl 1):13–119. doi:10.1111/bju.12080

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dylewski DA, Jamison MG, Borawski KM, Sherman ND, Amundsen CL, Webster GD (2007) A statistical comparison of pad numbers versus pad weights in the quantification of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 26:3–7. doi:10.1002/nau.20352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krhut J, Zachoval R, Smith PP et al (2014) Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 33:507–510. doi:10.1002/nau.22436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Crites MA, Sorial A, Ghoniem GM (2011) Risk factors for male slings: a comparative study of two techniques. Urology 78:192–196. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Song C, Doo CK, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H (2007) Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178:208–211. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study has not been supported financially.

Conflict of interest

Ricarda M. Bauer and Christian Gozzi declare lectures, consultancy work and participation in clinical trials for AMS. All other authors declare that no funding or other agreement has limited their ability to fairly complete and publish the present data, and they had full control of the primary data. There has been no extra-institutional funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Soljanik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soljanik, I., Bauer, R.M., Stief, C.G. et al. Pelvic floor muscle function is an independent predictor of outcome after retrourethral transobturator male sling procedure. World J Urol 33, 1143–1149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1418-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1418-y

Keywords

Navigation