Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes following radical cystectomy for micropapillary bladder cancer versus pure urothelial carcinoma: a matched cohort analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Micropapillary (MP) bladder cancer is a rare variant of urothelial carcinoma (UC) which has been associated with an aggressive natural history. We sought to report the outcomes of patients with MP bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy (RC) and compare survival to patients with pure UC of the bladder.

Methods

We identified 73 patients with MP bladder cancer and 748 patients with pure UC who underwent RC at our institution with median postoperative follow-up of 9.6 years. MP patients were stage-matched 1:2 to patients with pure UC. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.

Results

MP cancers were associated with a high rate of adverse pathologic features, as 48/73 patients (66 %) had pT3/4 tumors and 37 (50 %) had pN+ disease. Ten-year cancer-specific survival in MP patients was 31 %, compared with 53 % in the overall cohort with pure UC (p = 0.001). When patients with MP bladder cancer were then stage-matched to those with pure UC, no significant differences between the groups were noted with regard to 10-year local recurrence-free survival (62 vs. 69 %; p = 0.87), distant metastasis-free survival (44 vs. 56 %; p = 0.54), or cancer-specific survival (31 vs. 40 %; p = 0.41).

Conclusion

MP cancers are associated with a higher rate of locally advanced disease. However, when matched to patients with pure UC, patients with MP tumors did not have increased local/distant recurrence or adverse cancer-specific survival following RC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MP:

Micropapillary

RC:

Radical cystectomy

UC:

Urothelial carcinoma

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BCG:

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin

IQR:

Interquartile range

TUR:

Transurethral resection

CSS:

Cancer-specific survival

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29. doi:10.3322/caac.20138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Black PC, Brown GA, Dinney CP (2009) The impact of variant histology on the outcome of bladder cancer treated with curative intent. Urol Oncol 27(1):3–7. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amin MB, Ro JY, el-Sharkawy T, Lee KM, Troncoso P, Silva EG, Ordonez NG, Ayala AG (1994) Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 18(12):1224–1232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansson SL, Borghede G, Holmang S (1999) Micropapillary bladder carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases. J Urol 161(6):1798–1802. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68807-6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alvarado-Cabrero I, Sierra-Santiesteban FI, Mantilla-Morales A, Hernandez–Hernandez DM (2005) Micropapillary carcinoma of the urothelial tract. A clinicopathologic study of 38 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 9(1):1–5. doi:10.1053/j.anndiagpath.2004.10.001

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shah RB, Montgomery JS, Montie JE, Kunju LP (2012) Variant (divergent) histologic differentiation in urothelial carcinoma is under-recognized in community practice: impact of mandatory central pathology review at a large referral hospital. Urol Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.04.009

  7. Ghoneim IA, Miocinovic R, Stephenson AJ, Garcia JA, Gong MC, Campbell SC, Hansel DE, Fergany AF (2011) Neoadjuvant systemic therapy or early cystectomy? Single-center analysis of outcomes after therapy for patients with clinically localized micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urology 77(4):867–870. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edgerton N, Sirintrapun SJ, Munoz M, Chen Z, Osunkoya AO (2011) Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathological analysis of 24 cases. Int J Urol 18(1):49–54. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02672.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Blanca A, Cheng L (2010) Invasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Hum Pathol 41(8):1159–1164. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Comperat E, Roupret M, Yaxley J, Reynolds J, Varinot J, Ouzaid I, Cussenot O, Samaratunga H (2010) Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathological analysis of 72 cases. Pathology 42(7):650–654. doi:10.3109/00313025.2010.522173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamat AM, Dinney CP, Gee JR, Grossman HB, Siefker-Radtke AO, Tamboli P, Detry MA, Robinson TL, Pisters LL (2007) Micropapillary bladder cancer: a review of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with 100 consecutive patients. Cancer 110(1):62–67. doi:10.1002/cncr.22756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamat AM, Gee JR, Dinney CP, Grossman HB, Swanson DA, Millikan RE, Detry MA, Robinson TL, Pisters LL (2006) The case for early cystectomy in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive micropapillary bladder carcinoma. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):881–885. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00423-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Samaratunga H, Khoo K (2004) Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder; a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology 45(1):55–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01895.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Amin A, Epstein J (2012) Noninvasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 18 cases. Hum Pathol. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2012.04.013

    Google Scholar 

  15. AJCC (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lotan Y, Gupta A, Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, Vazina A, Karakiewicz PI, Bastian PJ, Rogers CG, Amiel G, Perotte P, Schoenberg MP, Lerner SP, Sagalowsky AI (2005) Lymphovascular invasion is independently associated with overall survival, cause-specific survival, and local and distant recurrence in patients with negative lymph nodes at radical cystectomy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(27):6533–6539. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lotan TL, Ye H, Melamed J, Wu XR, Shih Ie M, Epstein JI (2009) Immunohistochemical panel to identify the primary site of invasive micropapillary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 33(7):1037–1041. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181962dcd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ching CB, Amin MB, Tubbs RR, Elson P, Platt E, Dreicer R, Fergany A, Hansel DE (2011) HER2 gene amplification occurs frequently in the micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma: analysis by dual-color in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol 24(8):1111–1119. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2011.69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sangoi AR, Beck AH, Amin MB, Cheng L, Epstein JI, Hansel DE, Iczkowski KA, Lopez-Beltran A, Oliva E, Paner GP, Reuter VE, Ro JY, Shah RB, Shen SS, Tamboli P, McKenney JK (2010) Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the urinary tract among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 34(9):1367–1376. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181ec86b3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey K. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J.K., Boorjian, S.A., Cheville, J.C. et al. Outcomes following radical cystectomy for micropapillary bladder cancer versus pure urothelial carcinoma: a matched cohort analysis. World J Urol 30, 801–806 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0976-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0976-0

Keywords

Navigation