Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Significance of ADC value for detection and characterization of urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract using diffusion-weighted MRI

  • Topic paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) to detect and predict the histological characteristics of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated 20 suspicious lesions from 19 patients. MRI study included conventional sequences and DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps calculated between b = 0 and b = 1,000. ADC values were measured within two different regions of interest (ROI): a small identical ROI placed in the most restrictive part of the tumour and a larger ROI covering two-thirds of the mass surface. The mean ADC values of the tumours were compared with that of normal renal parenchyma using an unpaired Student’s t test. Association between ADC values and histological features was tested using non-parametric tests.

Results

Overall, 18 tumours were confirmed histologically as UTUCs. DWI failed to detect two cases of UTUCs (one CIS and one small tumour of 5 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in ADC values measured with the small or large ROI (p = 0.134). The mean ADC value of UTUC was significantly lower than that of the normal renal parenchyma (p < 0.001). No statistical association was found between ADC values and pathological features (location, p = 0.35; grade, p = 0.98; muscle-invasive disease, p = 0.76 and locally advanced stage, p = 0.57).

Conclusion

DWI may be interesting tool for detecting UTUCs regarding the difference of ADC values between the tumours and surrounding healthy tissues. In regard to low frequency of UTUCs, the association of ADC values and histological characteristics need further investigations in a large prospective multi-institutional study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roupret M, Zigeuner R, Palou J, Boehle A, Kaasinen E, Sylvester R, Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W (2011) European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas: 2011 update. Eur Urol 59(4):584–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Margulis V, Youssef RF, Karakiewicz PI, Lotan Y, Wood CG, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E, Weizer A, Raman JD, Remzi M, Roscigno M, Montorsi F, Bolenz C, Kassouf W, Shariat SF (2010) Preoperative multivariable prognostic model for prediction of nonorgan confined urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 184(2):453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brien JC, Shariat SF, Herman MP, Ng CK, Scherr DS, Scoll B, Uzzo RG, Wille M, Eggener SE, Terrell JD, Lucas SM, Lotan Y, Boorjian SA, Raman JD (2010) Preoperative hydronephrosis, ureteroscopic biopsy grade and urinary cytology can improve prediction of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 184(1):69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Browne RF, Meehan CP, Colville J, Power R, Torreggiani WC (2005) Transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics 25(6):1609–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walter C, Kruessell M, Gindele A, Brochhagen HG, Gossmann A, Landwehr P (2003) Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT. Br J Radiol 76(910):696–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi N, Kawashima A, Glockner JF, Hartman RP, Leibovich BC, Brau AC, Beatty PJ, King BF (2008) Small (< 2-cm) upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR urography. Radiology 247(2):451–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi N, Kawashima A, Glockner JF, Hartman RP, Kim B, King BF (2009) MR urography for suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Radiol 19(4):912–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy C, Lefevre F, Lemaitre L, Claudon M, Tuchmann C (2000) Upper urinary tract MRI. J Radiol 81(9 Suppl):1085–1095

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koh DM, Collins DJ (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(6):1622–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Padhani AR, Koh DM, Collins DJ (2011) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions. Radiology 261(3):700–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U, Sou H, Iino H, Araki T, Fujii H (2007) High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(2):409–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oto A, Yang C, Kayhan A, Tretiakova M, Antic T, Schmid-Tannwald C, Eggener S, Karczmar GS, Stadler WM (2011) Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(6):1382–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F (2007) Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 17(6):1385–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida S, Masuda H, Ishii C, Saito K, Kawakami S, Kihara K (2008) Initial experience of functional imaging of upper urinary tract neoplasm by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Urol 15(2):140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Kubo H, Nishitani H (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of urinary epithelial cancer with upper urinary tract obstruction: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 49(10):1195–1199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishizawa S, Imai S, Okaneya T, Nakayama T, Kamigaito T, Minagawa T (2010) Diffusion weighted imaging in the detection of upper urinary tract urothelial tumors. Int Braz J Urol 36(1):18–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Akita H, Jinzaki M, Kikuchi E, Sugiura H, Akita A, Mikami S, Kuribayashi S (2011) Preoperative T categorization and prediction of histopathologic grading of urothelial carcinoma in renal pelvis using diffusion-weighted MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(5):1130–1136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mostofi FK, Sorbin LH, Torloni H (1973) International histological classification of tumours: histological typing of urinary bladder tumours, vol 10. World Health Organization edn, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sobin L, Godspodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2009) Renal pelvis and ureter. In: John Wiley & Sons (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Urological tumours. International Union Against Cancer, 7th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 258–261 (rev. edn.)

  20. Nolte-Ernsting CC, Bucker A, Adam GB, Neuerburg JM, Jung P, Hunter DW, Jakse G, Gunther RW (1998) Gadolinium-enhanced excretory MR urography after low-dose diuretic injection: comparison with conventional excretory urography. Radiology 209(1):147–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Colin P, Ouzzane A, Pignot G, Ravier E, Crouzet S, Ariane MM, Audouin M, Neuzillet Y, Albouy B, Hurel S, Saint F, Guillotreau J, Guy L, Bigot P, De La Taille A, Arroua F, Marchand C, Matte A, Fais PO, Roupret M (2012) Comparison of oncological outcomes after segmental ureterectomy or radical nephroureterectomy in urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract: results from a large French multicentre study. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10960.x

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cornu JN, Roupret M, Carpentier X, Geavlete B, de Medina SG, Cussenot O, Traxer O (2010) Oncologic control obtained after exclusive flexible ureteroscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma. World J Urol 28(2):151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koh DM, Takahara T, Imai Y, Collins DJ (2007) Practical aspects of assessing tumors using clinical diffusion-weighted imaging in the body. Magn Reson Med Sci 6(4):211–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M, Okada S, Takahashi S, Kawai T, Suzuki K, Oshima H, Hara M, Shibamoto Y (2009) Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging—accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade. Radiology 251(1):112–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Colagrande S, Pasquinelli F, Mazzoni LN, Belli G, Virgili G (2010) MR-diffusion weighted imaging of healthy liver parenchyma: repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(4):912–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lambregts DM, Beets GL, Maas M, Curvo-Semedo L, Kessels AG, Thywissen T, Beets-Tan RG (2011) Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability. Eur Radiol 21(12):2567–2574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kobayashi S, Koga F, Yoshida S, Masuda H, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Komai Y, Yokoyama M, Saito K, Fujii Y, Kawakami S, Kihara K (2011) Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness. Eur Radiol 21(10):2178–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Colin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sufana Iancu, A., Colin, P., Puech, P. et al. Significance of ADC value for detection and characterization of urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract using diffusion-weighted MRI. World J Urol 31, 13–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0945-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0945-7

Keywords

Navigation