Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation and intercomparison of HY-2A/MetOp-A/Oceansat-2 scatterometer wind products

  • Remote sensing
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sea surface winds are of great significance in scientific research. In the last few years, three series of scatterometers were launched to measure these winds, including the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) aboard Meteorological Operational Satellite A (MetOp-A) and MetOp-B, Oceansat-2 Scatterometer (OSCAT), and HY-2A Scatterometer (HY-2A SCAT). Based on buoy wind data, validation and intercomparison of these scatterometers were performed. Scatterometer-derived wind and buoy wind data were collected only if the spatial difference was less than 0.1 degree and temporal difference less than 5 min. After discarding wind direction data outside five times the standard deviation, ASCAT wind products showed high accuracy in both wind speed and direction, with root-mean-square error (RMSE) 0.86 m/s and 17.97 degrees, respectively. HY-2A SCAT nearly meets the mission requirement, with RMSE for wind speed 1.23 m/s and 22.85 degrees for wind direction. OSCAT had poor performance when compared with the others. RMSE for wind speed was 1.54 m/s and 39.86 degrees for wind direction, which greatly exceeds the mission requirement of 20 degrees. In addition, the RMSE for wind direction shows a high-low pattern on buoy wind speed. However, a wind speed range from 14 to 15 m/s was found to be abnormal, and the reason remains unclear. There was no systematic dependency of both wind speed and direction residuals on buoy wind speed and cross-track location of the wind vector cells across the entire range. No seasonal variation was found for any scatterometer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentamy A, Autret E, Queffeulou P, Quilfen, Y. 2000. Intercomparison of ERS-2 and QuikSCAT winds. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Volume 1). IEEE, Honolulu, HI. p.234–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentamy A, Croize-Fillon D, Perigaud C. 2008. Characterization of ASCAT measurements based on buoy and QuikSCAT wind vector observations. Ocean Science, 4 (4): 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa M A, Legler D M, O’Brien J J, Smith S R. 2003. Sea Winds validation with research vessels. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 108 (C2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001028.

  • Chen G. 2004. An Intercomparison of TOPEX, NSCAT, and ECMWF wind speeds: illustrating and understanding systematic discrepancies. Monthly Weather Review, 132 (3): 780–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebuchi N, Graber H C, Caruso M J. (2002. Evaluation of wind vectors observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWinds using ocean buoy data. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 19 (12): 2049–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew T, Chakraborty A, Sarkar A, Kumar R. 2012. Comparison of oceanic winds measured by space-borne scatterometers and altimeters. Remote Sensing Letters, 3 (8): 715–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani S I, Das Gupta M, Sharma P, Prasad V S. (2014. Intercomparison of Oceansat-2 and ASCAT winds with in situ buoy observations and short-term numerical forecasts. Atmosphere-Ocean, 52 (1): 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Kumar P, Pal P K. 2012. Assimilation of Oceansat-2-scatterometer-derived surface winds in the weather research and forecasting model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (4): 1015–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles B W, Pollard B D, Dunbar R S. (2002. Direction interval retrieval with thresholded nudging: a method for improving the accuracy of QuikSCAT winds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40 (1): 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudha A K, Prasada Rao C V K. 2013. Comparison of Oceansat-2 scatterometer winds with buoy observations over the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. Remote Sensing Letters, 4 (2): 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhu J H, Lin M S, Huang X Q, Zhao Y L, Chen C T, Zhang Y G, Peng H L. 2013. First six months quality assessment of HY-2A SCAT wind products using in situ measurements. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 32 (11): 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Technology, College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China

    Qing Wu  (吴庆)

  2. Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China

    Ge Chen  (陈戈)

Authors
  1. Qing Wu  (吴庆)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ge Chen  (陈戈)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ge Chen  (陈戈).

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1406404, 41331172, 61361136001) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2013AA09A505)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Q., Chen, G. Validation and intercomparison of HY-2A/MetOp-A/Oceansat-2 scatterometer wind products. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 33, 1181–1190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4160-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4160-4

Keyword

Search

Navigation