Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the implementation and protocol of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the longitudinal BiDirect study and to report rates of study participation as well as management of incidental findings.

Methods

Data came from the BiDirect study that investigates the relationship between depression and arteriosclerosis and comprises 2258 participants in three cohorts: 999 patients with depression, 347 patients with manifest cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 912 population-based controls. The study program includes MRI of the brain. Reasons for non-participation were systematically collected. Incidental findings were categorized and disclosed according to clinical relevance.

Results

At baseline 2176 participants were offered MRI, of whom 1453 (67 %) completed it. Reasons for non-participation differed according to cohort, age and gender with controls showing the highest participation rate of 79 %. Patient cohorts had higher refusal rates and CVD patients a high prevalence of contraindications. In the first follow-up examination 69 % of participating subjects completed MRI.

Incidental findings were disclosed to 246 participants (17 %). The majority of incidental findings were extensive white matter hyperintensities requiring further diagnostic work-up.

Conclusions

Knowledge about subjects and sensible definition of incidental findings are crucial for large-scale imaging projects. Our data offer practical and concrete information for the design of future studies.

Key points

• Willingness to participate in MRI is generally high, also in follow-up examinations.

• Rates of refusal and prevalence of contraindications differ according to subject characteristics.

• Extensive white matter hyperintensities considerably increase the disclosure rates of incidental findings.

• MRI workflow requires continuous case-by-case handling by an interdisciplinary team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BL:

Baseline

CI:

Contraindication

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

FU:

Follow-up

IF:

Incidental finding

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OR:

Odds ratio

rs-fMRI:

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging

WMH:

White matter hyperintensity

References

  1. John U, Greiner B, Hensel E et al (2001) Study of health in Pomerania (SHIP): a health examination survey in an east German region: objectives and design. Soz Praventivmed 46:186–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bamberg F, Kauczor H-U, Weckbach S et al (2015) Whole-body MR imaging in the German National Cohort: rationale, design, and technical background. Radiology 277:206–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The UK Biobank Imaging Study (2015) Available via http://imaging.ukbiobank.ac.uk. http://imaging.ukbiobank.ac.uk. Accessed 4 Sep 2015

  4. Nooner KB, Colcombe SJ, Tobe RH et al (2012) The NKI-Rockland sample: a model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry. Front Neurosci 6:152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. van Norden AG, de Laat KF, Gons RA et al (2011) Causes and consequences of cerebral small vessel disease. The RUN DMC study: a prospective cohort study. Study rationale and protocol. BMC Neurol 11:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Geerlings MI, Appelman APA, Vincken KL et al (2010) Brain volumes and cerebrovascular lesions on MRI in patients with atherosclerotic disease. The SMART-MR study. Atherosclerosis 210:130–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Viswanathan A, Guichard J-P, Gschwendtner A et al (2006) Blood pressure and haemoglobin A1c are associated with microhaemorrhage in CADASIL: a two-centre cohort study. Brain 129:2375–2383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teismann H, Wersching H, Nagel M et al (2014) Establishing the bidirectional relationship between depression and subclinical arteriosclerosis - rationale, design, and characteristics of the BiDirect study. BMC Psychiatry 14:174

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hegenscheid K, Kühn J, Völzke H, Biffar R, Hosten N, Puls R (2009) Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of healthy volunteers: pilot study results from the population-based SHIP study. RoFo 181:748–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rimol LM, Hartberg CB, Nesvåg R et al (2010) Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 68:41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt R, Launer LJ, Nilsson L-G et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in diabetes the cardiovascular determinants of dementia (CASCADE) study. Diabetes 53:687–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikram MA, van der Lugt A, Niessen WJ et al (2011) The Rotterdam scan study: design and update up to 2012. Eur J Epidemiol 26:811–824

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hofman A, Murad SD, van Duijn CM et al (2013) The Rotterdam study: 2014 objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol 28:889–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeCarli C, Massaro J, Harvey D et al (2005) Measures of brain morphology and infarction in the framingham heart study: establishing what is normal. Neurobiol Aging 26:491–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 3C Study Group (2003) Vascular factors and risk of dementia: design of the three-city study and baseline characteristics of the study population. Neuroepidemiology 22:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Godin O, Dufouil C, Maillard P et al (2008) White matter lesions as a predictor of depression in the elderly: the 3C-Dijon study. Biol Psychiatry 63:663–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Kapeller P, Schmidt H, Hartung H-P (1999) MRI white matter hyperintensities: three-year follow-up of the Austrian stroke prevention study. Neurology 53:132–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baune BT, Roesler A, Knecht S, Berger K (2009) Single and combined effects of cerebral white matter lesions and lacunar infarctions on cognitive function in an elderly population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64A:118–124

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Qiu C, Cotch MF, Sigurdsson S et al (2012) Cerebral microbleeds and age-related macular degeneration: the AGES-Reykjavik study. Neurobiol Aging 33:2935–2937

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. de Mutsert R, den Heijer M, Rabelink TJ et al (2013) The Netherlands epidemiology of obesity (NEO) study: study design and data collection. Eur J Epidemiol 28:513–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schulz R, Beach SR, Ives DG, Martire LM, Ariyo AA, Kop WJ (2000) Association between depression and mortality in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Arch Intern Med 160:1761–1768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yue NC, Longstreth WT, Elster AD, Jungreis CA, O’Leary DH, Poirier VC (1997) Clinically serious abnormalities found incidentally at MR imaging of the brain: data from the cardiovascular health study. Radiology 202:41–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morris Z, Whiteley WN, Longstreth WT et al (2009) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 339:b3016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hegenscheid K, Seipel R, Schmidt CO et al (2012) Potentially relevant incidental findings on research whole-body MRI in the general adult population: frequencies and management. Eur Radiol 23:816–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leung L (2012) Incidental findings in neuroimaging: ethical and medicolegal considerations. Neurosci J 2013:e439145

  26. Illes J, Kirschen MP, Edwards E et al (2008) Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research. Neurology 70:384–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shoemaker JM, Holdsworth MT, Aine C et al (2011) A practical approach to incidental findings in neuroimaging research. Neurology 77:2123–2127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA et al (2008) Managing incidental findings in human subjects research. J Law Med Ethics 36:219–211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Müllerleile K (2015) Passive cardiovascular implants in magnetic resonance imaging. Statement of the German Cardiac Society on the safety of magnetic resonance imaging. Kardiologe 9:303

  30. Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL et al (2007) Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 357:1821–1828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Debette S, Markus HS (2010) The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c3666

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmidt CO, Hegenscheid K, Erdmann P et al (2012) Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study. Eur Radiol 23:1343–1351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all study participants for their time and engagement. Further words of gratitude are owed to each and everyone who tirelessly contributes to cope with organisational challenges, data collection, data maintenance and data processing on a daily basis. The scientific guarantor of this publication is Klaus Berger. The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: Klaus Berger reports grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and multiple institutions outside of the submitted work.

The remaining authors (Anja Teuber, Benedikt Sundermann, Harald Kugel, Walter Heindel, Jens Minnerup, Udo Dannlowski and Heike Wersching) of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

This study has received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grants FKZ-01ER0816 and FKZ-01ER1205). Several authors (Anja Teuber, Klaus Berger, Heike Wersching) have significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in BMC Psychiatry (2014) 14:174. Methodology: prospective, observational, performed at one institution

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Teuber.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 303 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teuber, A., Sundermann, B., Kugel, H. et al. MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study. Eur Radiol 27, 231–238 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9

Keywords

Navigation