March 2013, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 720-729,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 15 Sep 2012
The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography
To update quality standards for CT colonography based on consensus among opinion leaders within the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR).
Material and methods
A multinational European panel of nine members of the ESGAR CT colonography Working Group (representing six EU countries) used a modified Delphi process to rate their level of agreement on a variety of statements pertaining to the acquisition, interpretation and implementation of CT colonography. Four Delphi rounds were conducted, each at 2 months interval.
The panel elaborated 86 statements.
In the final round the panelists achieved complete consensus in 71 of 86 statements (82 %). Categories including the highest proportion of statements with excellent Cronbach's internal reliability were colon distension, scan parameters, use of intravenous contrast agents, general guidelines on patient preparation, role of CAD and lesion measurement.
Lower internal reliability was achieved for the use of a rectal tube, spasmolytics, decubitus positioning and number of CT data acquisitions, faecal tagging, 2D vs. 3D reading, and reporting.
The recommendations of the consensus should be useful for both the radiologist who is starting a CTC service and for those who have already implemented the technique but whose practice may need updating.
• Computed tomographic colonography is the optimal radiological method of assessing the colon
• This article reviews ESGAR quality standards for CT colonography
• This article is aimed to provide CT-colonography guidelines for practising radiologists
• The recommendations should help radiologists who are starting/updating their CTC services
Vining DJ, Celfand DW, Bechtold RE, Scharling ES, Grishaw EK, Shifrin RY (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. AJR 162:104
Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 17:2453–2461CrossRef
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160PubMedCrossRef
Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:3CrossRef
Shah JP, Hynan LS, Rockey DC (2009) Management of small polyps detected by screening CT colonography: patient and physician preferences. Am J Med 122:687–689PubMed
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1836–1842PubMed
Liedenbaum MH, Denters MJ, de Vries AH et al (2010) Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: Influence on image quality and patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:31–37CrossRef
- The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 23, Issue 3 , pp 720-729
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- CT colonography
- Computed tomography
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 2. University College London, Centre for Medical Imaging, University College Hospital, London, UK
- 3. Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 4. Virtual Colonoscopy Teaching Centre, Hooglede, Belgium
- 5. Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 6. Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo-Torino, Italy
- 7. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, The Netherlands
- 8. Department of Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
- 9. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza - Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
- 10. Department of Translational Research, and Advanced Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Nuovo Ospedale S. Chiara, UO Radiodiagnostica 1, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy