Date: 11 Aug 2010
Does the amount of tagged stool and fluid significantly affect the radiation exposure in low-dose CT colonography performed with an automatic exposure control?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To determine whether the amount of tagged stool and fluid significantly affects the radiation exposure in low-dose screening CT colonography performed with an automatic tube-current modulation technique.
The study included 311 patients. The tagging agent was barium (n = 271) or iodine (n = 40). Correlation was measured between mean volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) and the estimated x-ray attenuation of the tagged stool and fluid (ATT). Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of ATT on CTDI vol and the effect of ATT on image noise while adjusting for other variables including abdominal circumference.
CTDI vol varied from 0.88 to 2.54 mGy. There was no significant correlation between CTDI vol and ATT (p = 0.61). ATT did not significantly affect CTDI vol (p = 0.93), while abdominal circumference was the only factor significantly affecting CTDI vol (p < 0.001). Image noise ranged from 59.5 to 64.1 HU. The p value for the regression model explaining the noise was 0.38.
The amount of stool and fluid tagging does not significantly affect radiation exposure.
Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley K, Iyer RB, Hara AK, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Burgart LJ, Limburg PJ (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217CrossRefPubMed
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Smith RA, Brooks D, Andrews KS, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Levin TR, Pickhardt P, Rex DK, Thorson A, Winawer SJ (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMed
Keat N (2005) Report 05016: CT scanner automatic exposure control systems. Available via http://www.impactscan.org/reports/Report05016. Accessed Mar 28 2010
Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2006) Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 187:695–701CrossRef
Rizzo SM, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Blake MA, Toth TL, Saini S (2005) Do metallic endoprostheses increase radiation dose associated with automatic tube-current modulation in abdominal-pelvic MDCT? A phantom and patient study. Am J Roentgenol 184:491–496
Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Meerten EvP, Geleijns J, Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC, Tosi G (2004) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262. Available via http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm. Accessed Mar 28 2010
An S, Lee KH, Kim YH, Park SH, Kim HY, Kim SH, Kim N (2008) Screening CT colonography in an asymptomatic average-risk Asian population: a 2-year experience in a single institution. Am J Roentgenol 191:W100–W106CrossRef
Hsieh J (2003) Preliminaries. In: Hsieh J (ed) Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Bellingham, WA, p 34
Soni NK, Cohn NA (2009) Strategies to reduce radiation dose in Philips multidetector computed tomography scanners. In: Mahesh M (ed) MDCT physics: the basics-technology, image quality and radiation dose. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 125–130
Adams R, Bischof L (1994) Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16:641–647CrossRef
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (1992) Region-oriented segmentation. In: Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (eds) Digital image processing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, pp 458–465
Lee J, Kim G, Lee H, Shin B-S, Shin YG (2008) Fast path planning in virtual colonoscopy. Comput Biol Med 38:1012–1023
Summers RM, Franaszek M, Miller MT, Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Schindler WR (2005) Computer-aided detection of polyps on oral contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 184:105–108
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (1992) Dilation and erosion. In: Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (eds) Digital image processing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, pp 518–524
Prokop M (2003) Image analysis. In: Prokop M, Galanski M (ed) Computed tomography of the body. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, p 143
- Does the amount of tagged stool and fluid significantly affect the radiation exposure in low-dose CT colonography performed with an automatic exposure control?
Volume 21, Issue 2 , pp 345-352
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- CT colonography
- Radiation dose
- Automatic exposure control
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, Korea
- 2. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Bundang, Korea
- 3. Department of Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- 4. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- 5. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- 6. Philips Healthcare, CT Clinical Science, Cleveland, OH, USA
- 7. Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea