Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine the effect of a daily pain diary on recovery from acute low back sprain. Summary of background data: Pain diaries are often recommended to or used by patients suffering with acute lumbar (low back) sprain. Diaries have been shown to be associated, however, with a slower rate of recovery after whiplash (neck) injury. The effect of diary use on recovery from low back injury is unknown. Subjects with acute lumbar (low back) sprain were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: a diary group and control group. A total of 58 out of 62 initially recruited subjects were seen in follow-up 3-month post-injury, 29 in the diary group, and 29 in the control group. Data were gathered within 1 week of injury on sex, age, and Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) scores. The diary group was asked then to keep a record of their overall pain experience, rating their pain on a scale of 1–10 on a daily basis for 4 weeks. At the outset, both groups had similar mean age, sex distribution, and mean ODQ scores. After 4 weeks of pain diary use, fewer diary group subjects reported recovery at 3 months compared with the control group (52 vs. 79 %, respectively, p < 0.05). The use of a pain diary for 4 weeks in acute lumbar sprain subjects is associated with a reduced rate of recovery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferrari R, Russell AS (2010) Effect of a symptom diary on symptom frequency and intensity in healthy subjects. J Rheumatol 37:2387–2389
Ferrari R, Louw D (2013) Effect of a pain diary use on recovery from acute whiplash injury, a cohort study. JZUS Sci B 14(11):1049–1053
Eich E, Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford SB (1985) Memory for pain: relation between past and present pain intensity. Pain 23:375–379
Kahneman D, Fredrickson BL, Schrieber CA, Redelmeier DA (1993) When more pain is preferred to less: adding a better end. Psychol Sci 4:401–405
Gorin AA, Stone AA (2001) Recall biases and cognitive errors in retrospective self-reports: a call for momentary assessments. In: Baum A, Revenson T, Singer J (eds) Handbook of health psychology. Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 405–413
Sadovsky R, Dodick DW (2005) Identifying migraine in primary care settings. Am J Med 118(Suppl 1):11S–17S
Aaron LA, Turner JA, Mancl L, Brister H, Sawchuk CN (2005) Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: is reactivity a problem? J Pain 6:107–115
Roelofs J, Peters ML, Patijn J, Schouten EG, Vlaeyen JW (2006) Electronic diary assessment of pain-related fear, attention to pain, and pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients. Pain 112:335–342
Ferrari R, Russell AS, Kelly AJ (2006) Assessing whiplash recovery—the Whiplash disability questionnaire. Aust Fam Physician 35:653–654
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrari, R. Effect of a pain diary use on recovery from acute low back (lumbar) sprain. Rheumatol Int 35, 55–59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3082-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3082-3