Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Objektive DNA-Malignitätsgradierung als Ergänzung zum histologischen Gleason-Score

Frankfurter Konsens

Objective DNA malignancy grading as adjunct to the histological Gleason score

Frankfurt consensus

  • Pathologie-Forum
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Blomfield M et al (2014) Karyotypic evolutions of cancer species in rats during the long latent periods after injection of nitrosurea. Mol Cytogenet 7:71–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Böcking A (2015) Comparability of tumor-cytogenetics and -DNA-cytometry. Mol Cytogenet 8:28–29. doi:10.1186/s13039-015-0132-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Böcking A, Dietz J (2013) Prognostische DNA-Zytometrie beim Prostatakarzinom. Dtsch Z Onkol 45(4):144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Böcking A et al (1995) Consensus-report of the ESACP-task force on standardisation of diagnostic DNA cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy. Anal Cell Pathol 8:67–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Böcking A et al (2013) Diagnostic Cytometry. In: Mehrotra R (Hrsg) Oral oncology: a concise guide. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, S 125–146

    Google Scholar 

  6. Böcking A et al (2014) DNA-grading of prostate cancer. Systematic review of the literature with descriptive data analysis. Pathol Discov 7:2. doi:doi.org/10.7243/2052-7896-2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB et al (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Cancer 29:1228–1243

  8. Friedrich D et al (2012) Identification of prostate cancer cell nuclei for DNA-grading of malignancy. In: Tolxdorf T et al (Hrsg) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2012, Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, S 234–239

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giroud F et al (1998) 1997 ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA-image cytometry. Part II: Recommendations for quality assurance. Anal Cell Pathol 17:201–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haroske G et al (1998) 1997 ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA-image cytometry. Part I: Basic considerations and recommendations for preparation, measurements and interpretation. Anal Cell Pathol 17: 189–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haroske G et al (2001) Fourth updated ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA-image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 23:89–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pathologie, Krankenhaus Düren, Roonstraße 30, 52309, Düren, Deutschland

    A. Böcking

  2. Pathologie Koblenz, Koblenz, Deutschland

    S. Biesterfeld

  3. Landesverband Baden-Württemberg im Bundesverband Prostatakrebs Selbsthilfe, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland

    J. Dietz

  4. Institut für Pathologie „Georg Schmorl“, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    G. Haroske

  5. Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Trier, Deutschland

    J. Kriegsmann

  6. Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pathologie, Frankfurt, Deutschland

    H. Motherby & S. Falk

Authors
  1. A. Böcking
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Biesterfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Haroske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Kriegsmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Motherby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Falk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Böcking.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Böcking, S. Biesterfeld, J. Dietz, G. Haroske, J. Kriegsmann, H. Motherby und S. Falk geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

H.A. Baba, Essen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Böcking, A., Biesterfeld, S., Dietz, J. et al. Objektive DNA-Malignitätsgradierung als Ergänzung zum histologischen Gleason-Score. Pathologe 36, 498–502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-015-0074-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-015-0074-3

Search

Navigation