Skip to main content
Log in

On Genius, Prizes, and the Mathematical Celebrity Culture

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. American Mathematical Society, AMS Membership (2014), http://www.ams.org/membership/membership (as of April 17, 2014).

  2. Laurinda S. Dixon, The Dark Side of Genius: The Melancholic Persona in Art, ca. 1500–1700 (2013). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  3. Elizabeth Gilbert, “Your Elusive Creative Genius,” TED talk (February 2009). http://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_gilbert_on_genius (as of February 2, 2014).

  4. Reuben Hersh and Vera John-Steiner, Loving+Hating Mathematics: Challenging the Myths of Mathematical Life (2011). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  5. Gizem Karaali, “Mathematics in Popular Culture: Essays on Appearances in Film, Fiction, Games, Television and Other Media, edited by Jessica K. Sklar and Elizabeth S. Sklar; Loving+Hating Mathematics: Challenging the Myths of Mathematical Life, by Reuben Hersh and Vera John-Steiner; Mathematicians: An Outer View of The Inner World, by Mariana Cook,” extended book review (2013). Association for Women in Mathematics Newsletter, Volume 43, Number 6 (November-December 2013), pages 22–25.

  6. Gizem Karaali, “The Genius as a Characterization of the Creative Spirit in Mathematics and the Arts,” Proceedings of Bridges 2014: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, edited by Gary Greenfield, George Hart, and Reza Sarhangi, Tessellations Publishing, Phoenix, AZ, 2014, pages 413–416. Available at http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2014/bridges2014-413.html.

  7. Young-gun Ko and Jin-young Kim, “Scientific Geniuses Psychopathology as a Moderator in the Relation Between Creative Contribution Types and Eminence,” Creativity Research Journal, Volume 20, Number 3 (2008), pages 251–261.

  8. Evelyn Lamb, “Math and the Genius Myth,” blog post, Blog on Math Blogs, February 3, 2015, http://blogs.ams.org/blogonmathblogs/ 2015/02/03/math-and-the-genius-myth/.

  9. Sarah-Jane Leslie, Andrei Cimpian, Meredith Meyer, and Edward Freeland, “Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines,” Science, Volume 347, Number 6219 (January 16, 2015), pages 262–265.

  10. Thomas Lin, “A ‘Rebel’ Without a Ph.D.: A Q&A with Freeman Dyson,” Quanta Magazine, March 26, 2014, https://www.quanta magazine.org/20140326-a-rebel-without-a-ph-d/.

  11. Matilde Marcolli, “The Dark Heart of Our Brightness,” talk (April 2010). Slides available online at http://www.its.caltech.edu/∼matilde/ DarkBrightness.pdf (as of March 14, 2014).

  12. Greg Martin, “Addressing the underrepresentation of women in mathematics conferences,” February 23, 2015, http://arxiv.org/ abs/1502.06326.

  13. Cathy O’Neill, “I Love Math And I Hate The Fields Medal,” blog post, ...aftermath, February 1, 2015, http://horizonsaftermath. blogspot.com/2015/02/i-love-math-and-i-hate-fields-medal.html.

  14. Terence Tao, “Work Hard,” blog post, What’s new?, https:// terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/work-hard/, accessed on March 23, 2015.

  15. Sandra Upson and Lauren F. Friedman, “Where Are All the Female Geniuses?” Scientific American Mind, Volume 23, Issue 5 (2012), pages 63–65.

  16. Anatoly Vershik, “What Is Good for Mathematics? Thoughts on the Clay Millennium Prizes,” Notices of the American Mathematical Society, Volume 54, Number 1 (January 2007), pages 45–47.

  17. Donald Weidman, “Emotional Perils of Mathematics,” letter (1965). Science. September 3, 1965: Volume 149, Number 3688, page 1048.

  18. Madeline Will, “Disciplines That Expect ‘Brilliance’ Tend to Punish Women, Study Finds,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 15, 2015, available at http://chronicle.com/article/Disciplines-That- Expect/151217/.

  19. Margot and Rudolf Wittkower, Born Under Saturn: The Character and Conduct of Artists (2007). New York: New York Review Books (originally published in 1962).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gizem Karaali.

Additional information

The Viewpoint column offers readers of The Mathematical Intelligencer the opportunity to write about any issue of interest to the international mathematical community. Disagreement and controversy are welcome. The views and opinions expressed here, however, are exclusively those of the author, and the publisher and editors-in-chief do not endorse them or accept responsibility for them. Articles for Viewpoint should be submitted to the Editor-in-Chief, Majorie Senechal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karaali, G. On Genius, Prizes, and the Mathematical Celebrity Culture. Math Intelligencer 37, 61–65 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-015-9577-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-015-9577-2

Keywords

Navigation