Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The G8 screening tool detects relevant geriatric impairments and predicts survival in elderly patients with a haematological malignancy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The G8 screening tool was developed to separate fit older cancer patients who were able to receive standard treatment from those that should undergo a geriatric assessment to guide tailoring of therapy. We set out to determine the discriminative power and prognostic value of the G8 in older patients with a haematological malignancy. Between September 2009 and May 2013, a multi-dimensional geriatric assessment was performed in consecutive patients aged ≥67 years diagnosed with blood cancer at the Innsbruck University Hospital. The assessment included (instrumental) activities of daily living, cognition, mood, nutritional status, mobility, polypharmacy and social support. In parallel, the G8 was also administered (cut-off ≤ 14). Using a cut-off of ≥2 impaired domains, 70 % of the 108 included patients were considered as having an impaired geriatric assessment while 61 % had an impaired G8. The G8 lacked discriminative power for impairments on full geriatric assessment: sensitivity 69, specificity 79, positive predictive value 89 and negative predictive value 50 %. However, G8 was an independent predictor of mortality within the first year after inclusion (hazard ratio 3.93; 95 % confidence interval 1.67–9.22, p < 0.001). Remarkably, patients with impaired G8 fared poorly, irrespective of treatment choices (p < 0.001). This is the first report on the clinical and prognostic relevance of G8 in elderly patients with haematological malignancies. Although the G8 lacked discriminative power for outcome of multi-dimensional geriatric assessment, this score appears to be a powerful prognosticator and could potentially represent a useful tool in treatment decisions. This novel finding certainly deserves further exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. seer.cancer.gov. 2013.

  2. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr, Albain KS (1999) Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341(27):2061–2067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stauder R (2012) The challenge of individualised risk assessment and therapy planning in elderly high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients. Ann Hematol 91(9):1333–1343

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Extermann M, Aapro M, Bernabei R et al (2005) Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55(3):241–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamaker ME, Vos AG, Smorenburg CH, de Rooij SE, van Munster BC (2012) The value of geriatric assessments in predicting treatment tolerance and all-cause mortality in older patients with cancer. Oncologist 17(11):1439–1449

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mathoulin-Pelissier S et al (2012) Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol 23(8):2166–2172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ et al (1999) The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition 15(2):116–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soubeyran P, Bellera C, Goyard J et al (2011) Validation of the G8 screening tool in geriatric oncology; the ONCODAGE project. J Clin Oncol 29(15S):9001

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hamaker ME, Jonker JM, de Rooij SE, Vos AG, Smorenburg CH, van Munster BC (2012) Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 13(10):e437–e444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valentiny C, Kemmler G, Stauder R (2012) Age, sex and gender impact multidimensional geriatric assessment in elderly cancer patients. J Geriatr Oncol 3:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatry Res 12(3):189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA, Brooks JO III et al (1991) Proposed factor structure of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Int Psychogeriatr 3(1):23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barthel D (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 14:61–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9(3):179–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B (1986) Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67(6):387–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fydich F, Sommer G, Brahler E, F-SozU (2007) Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstutzung. Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co.; KG

  17. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL et al (2008) WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue. IARC, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR et al (1992) Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res 41(3):237–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oberaigner W (2007) Errors in survival rates caused by routinely used deterministic record linkage methods. Methods Inf Med 46(6):420–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Horgan AM, Leighl NB, Coate L et al (2012) Impact and feasibility of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in the oncology setting: a pilot study. Am J Clin Oncol 35(4):322–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaibi P, Magne N, Breton S et al (2011) Influence of geriatric consultation with comprehensive geriatric assessment on final therapeutic decision in elderly cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 79(3):302–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Caillet P, Canoui-Poitrine F, Vouriot J et al (2011) Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the decision-making process in elderly patients with cancer: ELCAPA Study. J Clin Oncol 29(27):3636–3642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kenis C, Decoster L, Van PK et al (2013) Performance of two geriatric screening tools in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013

  24. Tucci A, Ferrari S, Bottelli C, Borlenghi E, Drera M, Rossi G (2009) A comprehensive geriatric assessment is more effective than clinical judgment to identify elderly diffuse large cell lymphoma patients who benefit from aggressive therapy. Cancer 115(19):4547–4553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG et al (2011) Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3457–3465

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aaldriks AA, Giltay EJ, le Cessie S et al (2013) Prognostic value of geriatric assessment in older patients with advanced breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Breast 22:753–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aaldriks AA, Maartense E, le Cessie S (2011) Predictive value of geriatric assessment for patients older than 70 years, treated with chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 79(2):205–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kristjansson SR, Jordhoy MS, Nesbakken A et al (2010) Which elements of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) predict post-operative complications and early mortality after colorectal cancer surgery? J Geriatr Oncol 1(2):57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramsdale EE, Polite N, Bylow KA, Kindler HL, Dale W (2011) Relationship between components of the comprehensive geriatric assessment, chemotherapy dose intensity, and overall survival in a colorectal cancer cohort age 65 and older. J. Clin. Oncol. S9000

  31. Kanesvaran R, Li H, Koo KN, Poon D (2011) Analysis of prognostic factors of comprehensive geriatric assessment and development of a clinical scoring system in elderly Asian patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(27):3620–3627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Soubeyran P, Fonck M, Blanc-Bisson C et al (2012) Predictors of early death risk in older patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(15):1829–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Deschler B, Ihorst G, Platzbecker U et al (2013) Parameters detected by geriatric and quality of life assessment in 195 older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia are highly predictive for outcome. Haematologica 98(2):208–216

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wildes TM, Ruwe AP, Fournier C et al (2013) Geriatric assessment is associated with completion of chemotherapy, toxicity and survival in older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 4(3):227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Biesma B, Wymenga AN, Vincent A et al (2011) Quality of life, geriatric assessment and survival in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with carboplatin-gemcitabine or carboplatin-paclitaxel: NVALT-3 a phase III study. Ann Oncol 22(7):1520–1527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hamaker ME, Buurman BM, van Munster BC, Kuper IM, Smorenburg CH, de Rooij SE (2011) The value of a comprehensive geriatric assessment for patient care in acutely hospitalized older patients with cancer. Oncologist 16:1403–1412

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Honecker FU, Wedding U, Rettig K, Huschens S, Bokemeyer C (2009) Use of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly patients (pts) with solid tumors to predict mortality. Journal of Clinical Oncology Conference: 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, 29 May to 2 June 2009 Conference Publication: (var pagings) 27 (15 Suppl 1) (pp 9549):20

  38. Klepin HD, Geiger AM, Tooze JA et al (2013) Geriatric assessment predicts survival for older adults receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood 121(21):4287–4294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klepin HD, Geiger AM, Tooze JA et al (2011) The feasibility of inpatient geriatric assessment for older adults receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(10):1837–1846

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K et al (2011) Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 305(1):50–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW et al (2005) Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people–results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(10):1675–1680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was financially supported by Verein Senioren-Krebshilfe.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marije E. Hamaker.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Appendix Classification criteria for tumour characteristics and initial treatment per disease entity [17]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamaker, M.E., Mitrovic, M. & Stauder, R. The G8 screening tool detects relevant geriatric impairments and predicts survival in elderly patients with a haematological malignancy. Ann Hematol 93, 1031–1040 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-013-2001-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-013-2001-0

Keywords

Navigation