Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An anatomical investigation of the mandibular second molar using micro-computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

An understanding of root anatomy is an important foundation for providing successful endodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to use micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to investigate the root anatomy of the mandibular second molar.

Methods

Eighteen mandibular second molars were scanned using micro-CT. Images were reconstructed, and measurements and observations were recorded regarding pulpal floor anatomy, canal configuration, root wall thickness along the root, presence of calcifications in the pulp chamber and in canals, and apical anatomy.

Results/conclusions

The most frequently found mesial root canal configuration was Vertucci Type 7 (1-2-1-2), which was seen in 33.3 % of samples. Distal canals were most frequently Vertucci Type 1 (one canal), with 61.1 % of samples showing this configuration. 11.1 % of samples had two canals, 44.4 % of samples had three canals, 33.3 % of samples had four canals, and 11.1 % of samples had five canals at some point along the length of the roots. Average root wall thickness between the mesiobuccal canal and the furcation was 1.23 mm. Mesiolingual canal root wall thickness was on average 1.29 mm, and the distal root furcation wall thickness averaged 1.41 mm. 77.8 % of samples had calcifications present in both the pulp chamber and within the canals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berutti E, Fedon G (1992) Thickness of cementum/dentin in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. J Endod 18:545–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burch JG, Hulen S (1972) The relationship of the apical foramen to the anatomic apex of the tooth root. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 34:262–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham CJ, Senia ES (1992) A three-dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 18:294–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeDeus QD (1975) Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod 1:361–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M et al (2010) Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review. J Endod 36:1919–1931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL (2004) Morphological measurements of anatomic landmarks in human maxillary and mandibular molar pulp chambers. J Endod 30:388–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowker SE, Davis GR, Elliott JC (1997) X-ray microtomography: non-destructive three-dimensional imaging for in vitro endodontics studies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:510–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartwell G, Bellizzi R (1982) Clinical investigation of in vivo endodontically treated mandibular and maxillary molars. J Endod 8:555–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hull TE, Robertson PB, Steiner JC et al (2003) Patterns of endodontic care for a Washington state population. J Endod 29:553–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krasner P, Rankow HJ (2004) Anatomy of the pulp-chamber floor. J Endod 30:5–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuttler Y (1955) Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc 50:544–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nielson RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD et al (1995) Microcomputed tomography: an advanced system for detailed endodontic research. J Endod 21:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters OA (2004) Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 30:559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schilder H (1967) Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 723-744

  15. Schilder H (1974) Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 18:269–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shabahang S, Goon WWY, Gluskin AH (1996) An in vivo evaluation of root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod 22:616–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein TJ, Corcoron JF (1990) Anatomy of the root apex and its histologic changes with age. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 69:238–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weine FS, Pasiewicz RA, Rice RT (1988) Canal configuration of the mandibular second molar using a clinically oriented in vitro method. J Endod 14:207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors deny any conflicts of interest and any financial affiliations related to this study or its sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha P. Harris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barsness, S.A., Bowles, W.R., Fok, A. et al. An anatomical investigation of the mandibular second molar using micro-computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 37, 267–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1364-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1364-9

Keywords

Navigation