Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and the foot remain asymptomatic; however, they have increasingly been examined in the radiology literature, because they can cause painful syndromes or degenerative changes in response to overuse and trauma. Our aim was to document a detailed investigation on the accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of Turkish subjects in both the feet according to the sex, frequency and division of the bones, coexistence and bilaterality by radiography. A double-centered study was performed retrospectively to determine the incidence of the accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the ankle and foot. Accessory ossicles (21.2%) and sesamoid bones (9.6%) were detected by Radiographs of 984 subjects. The most common accessory ossicles were accessory navicular (11.7%), os peroneum (4.7%), os trigonum (2.3%), os supranaviculare (1.6%), os vesalianum (0.4%), os supratalare (0.2%), os intermetatarseum (0.2%). We observed bipartite hallux sesamoid in 2.7% of radiographs. Interphalangeal sesamoid bone of the hallux was seen in 2% of radiographs. Incidences of metatarsophalangeal sesamoid bones were found as 0.4% in the second digit, 0.2% third digit, 0.1% fourth digit and 4.3% fifth digit. We also identified the coexistencies of two different accessory ossicles as 6%, accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones as 7%, and bipartite sesamoid bones and sesamoid bones as 1.9%. Distribution of the most common accessory ossicles in male and female subjects was similar. We reported the incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the feet in Turkish adult population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS (2001) MR imaging and CT in the assesment of osseous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:567–578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bizzaro AH (1921) On sesamoid and supernumerary bones of the limbs. J Anat 55:256–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cilli F, Akcaoglu M (2005) The incidence of accessory bones of the foot and their clinical significance. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 39:243–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlin MJ (2006) Sesamoid and accessory bones of the foot. In: Surgery of the foot and ankle. 8th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 438–494

  5. Goldberg I, Nathan H (1987) Anatomy and pathology of the sesamoid bones. The hand compared to the foot. Int Orthop 11:141–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies MB, Abdlslam K, Gibson RJ (2003) Interphalangeal sesamoid bones of the great toe: an anatomic variant demanding careful scrutiny of radiographs. Clin Anat 16:520–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dharap AS, Al-Hashimi H, Kassab S, Abu-Hijleh MF (2007) Incidence and ossification of sesamoid bones in the hands and feet: a radiographic study in an Arab population. Clin Anat 20:416–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Du H, Nie L, Wang HS, Zhang CJ (2004) Chondromalacia of sesamoids in first metatarsophalangeal joint. Chin J Traumatol 7:127–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inge GAL, Ferguson AB (1933) surgery of the sesamoid bones of the great toe. Arch Surg 27:466

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jahss MH (1981) The sesamoids of the hallux. Clin Orthop Relat Res 157:88–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiter E, Akkaya S, Kilic BA, Demirkan F (2006) Distribution of the metatarsophalangeal sesamoids in Turkish subjects. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruse RW, Chen J (1995) Accessory ossicles of the foot: clinical significance. Mil Med 160:464–467

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawson JP (1994) International skeletal society lecture in honor of Howard D. Dorfman. Clinically significant radiologic anatomic variants of the skeleton. Am J Roentgenol 163:249–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Minor JM (1987) Comparative anatomy and significance of the sesamoid bone of the peroneus longus muscle (os peroneum). J Anat 151:85–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Minor JM (1988) The ventral metacarpo- and metatarso-phalangeal sesamoid bones: comparative anatomy and evolutionary aspects. Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb 134(5):693–731

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Minor JM (1999) Congenital absence of the lateral metatarso-phalangeal sesamoid bone of the human hallux: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 21(3):225–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller GA, Black JR (1990) Symptomatic os supra naviculare:a case reaport. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 80:248–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller TT (2002) Painful accessory bones of the foot. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:153–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCarthy D, Reed T, Abell N (1995) The hallucal interphalangeal sesamoid. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 85:765–766

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvadó E, Camins A, Danús M, Saurí A (2003) Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 13:L164–L177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roukis TS, Hurless JS (1996) The hallucal interphalangeal sesamoid. J Foot Ankle Surg 35:303–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarin VK, Erickson GM, Giori NJ, Bergman AG, Carter DR (1999) Coincident development of sesamoid bones and clues to their evolution. Anat Rec 257:174–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarrafian SK (1993) Osteology. In: Sarrafian SK (ed) Anatomy of the foot and ankle. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 89–112

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shands AR Jr, Wentz IJ (1953) Congenital anomalies, accessory ossicles, and osteochondritis in the feet of 850 children. Surg Clin North Am 97:1643–1666

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith AD, Carter JR, Marcus RE (1984) Os vesalianum as a cause of lateral foot pain: a familial case and its treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 8:56–58

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sobel M, Pavlov H, Geppert MJ, Thompson FM, DiCarlo EF, Davis WH (1994) Painful os peroneum syndrome: a spectrum of conditions responsible for plantar lateral foot pain. Foot Ankle Int 15:112–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsuruta T, Shiokawa Y, Kato A, Matsumoto T, Yamazoe Y, Oike T et al (1981) Radiological study of the accessory skeletal elements in the foot and ankle. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 55:357–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the grants from the Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Management Unit Antalya, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, 07070, Antalya, Turkey

    Nigar Coskun, R. Yavuz Arican & Muzaffer Sindel

  2. 6315 Vanderbilt, Houston, TX, 7005, USA

    Mehtap Yuksel

  3. Department of Radiology, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, 07070, Antalya, Turkey

    Metin Cevener, Oguz Bircan & Timur Sindel

  4. Department of Orthopedics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, 07070, Antalya, Turkey

    Hakan Ozdemir

  5. Department of Anatomy, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

    Sezgin Ilgi

Authors
  1. Nigar Coskun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehtap Yuksel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Metin Cevener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Yavuz Arican
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hakan Ozdemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Oguz Bircan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Timur Sindel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sezgin Ilgi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Muzaffer Sindel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigar Coskun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coskun, N., Yuksel, M., Cevener, M. et al. Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 19–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0383-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0383-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation