Skip to main content
Log in

The potential of precision surface irrigation in the Indus Basin Irrigation System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research we explore the potential of precision surface irrigation to improve irrigation performance under the warabandi system prevalent in the Indus Basin Irrigation System. Data on field dimensions, field slopes along with characteristic soil infiltration properties and outlet discharge were collected through a survey of a sample tertiary unit of Maira Branch Canal, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. The performance of all fields in the tertiary unit was analysed and reported in aggregate, with detailed results of one field presented for illustration. The objective is to determine the optimum field layout, defined as the number of border strips, for the observed field characteristics to maximize performance. The results indicate that performance improvement is relatively easily achievable through changes in field layout within current irrigation services. Estimated application efficiency is sensitive to the selected depth of application, and it is important that a practical depth of application is selected. We recommend a depth of application of 50 mm and show how this is achievable and leads to a low quarter distribution uniformity of 0.750 and an application efficiency of 80 %. We also explore the feasibility of a 10-day warabandi rather than the 7-day warabandi and show that there is no significant change in the performance under a 10-day warabandi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a p :

Proportion of total available area cultivated

D :

Depth of water supplied to the root zone (mm)

\(\varepsilon_{\text{i}}\) :

Efficiency

E :

Total number of efficiency terms

N :

Number of border strips in the field

q :

Discharge per unit width

t :

Irrigation interval (s)

t co :

Cut-off time for each border strip

V :

Volume of water applied

w N :

Width of each border strip and

w a :

Water allowance (L s−1 ha−1)

References

  • ADB (2005) Pakistan: Pehur high-level canal Project, Project Completion Report Project Number: PAK 19141 Loan Number: 1294-PAK(SF). http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-document/68796/19141-pak-pcr.pdf. Accessed June 2015

  • Anwar AA, Ul Haq Z (2013) An old–new measure of canal water inequity. Water Int 38(5):536–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandaragoda DJ, Rehman SU (1995) Warabandi in Pakistan’s canal irrigation systems: widening gap between theory and practice. IIMI Country paper Pakistan No. 7, International Irrigation Management Institute, Sri Lanka, 89 pp

  • Bautista E, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Niblack M (2009a) Analysis of surface irrigation systems with WinSRFR: example application. Agric Water Manag 96:1162–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista E, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Schlegel J (2009b) Modern analysis of surface irrigation systems with WinSRFR. Agric Water Manag 96:1146–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista E, Schlegel JL, Strelkoff, TS (2012) WinSRFR 4.1 - User Manual. USDA-ARS Arid Land Agricultural Research Center. 21881 N. Cardon Lane, Maricopa, AZ, USA

  • Bautista E, Schlegel JL, Clemmens AJ (2015) The SRFR 5 modeling system for surface irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng (on line)

  • Bishop AA, Long AK (1983) Irrigation water delivery for equity between users. J Irrig Drain Eng 109(4):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos MG, Burton MA, Molden DJ (2005) Irrigation and drainage performance assessment, practical guidelines. CABI Publishing, ‎Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt CM, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Solomon KH, Bliesner RD, Hardy LA, Howell TA, Eisenhauer DE (1997) Irrigation performance measures: efficiency and uniformity. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 123(6):423–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Ouyang Z, Sun Z, Wu L, Li F (2012) Evaluation on the potential of improving border irrigation performance through border dimensions optimization: a case study on the irrigation districts along the lower Yellow River. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmens AJ (1986) Canal capacities for demand under surface irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 112(4):331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemmens AJ (1987) Arranged delivery schedules. In: Planning, operation, rehabilitation and automation of irrigation water delivery systems, proceedings symposium, ASCE irrigation and drainage division specialty conference, ASCE, pp 57–67

  • Clemmens AJ, Bos MG (1990) Statistical methods for irrigation system water delivery performance evaluation. Irrigat Drain Syst 4:345–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemmens AJ, Dedrick AR (1982) Limits for practical level-basin design. J Irrig Drain Div Am Soc Civ Eng 108(IR2):127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmens AJ, Dedrick (1994) Irrigation techniques and evaluations. Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, pp 64–103

  • Clemmens AJ, Dedrick AR,Strand RJ (1995) BASIN 2.0. A computer program for the design of level-basin irrigation systems. WCL Report #19, U.S. Water Conservation Laboratory, Phoenix, AZ, USA

  • Clyma W, Ali A (1977) Traditional and improved irrigation practices in Pakistan. In: Proceedings of ASCE conference on water management for irrigation and drainage practices, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 201–216

  • De Vries TT, Anwar AA (2004) Irrigation scheduling I: integer programming approach. J Irrig Drain Eng 130(1):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson M, Bangash HD, Stacey DB (2003) Swabi salinity control and reclamation project. Proc ICE-Water Marit Eng 156(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken K (ed) (2012) Irrigation in Southern and Eastern Asia in figures: Aquastat survey, 2011. Food and Agriculture of the United Nations

  • Ghuman AR, Khan MZ, Khan AH, Munir S (2010) Assessment of operational strategies for logical and optimal use of irrigation water in a downstream control system. Irrig Drain 59:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez C, Cervera L, Moret-Fernandez D (2011) Basin irrigation design with longitudinal slope. Agric Water Manag 98:1516–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys E, Kukal SS, Christen EW, Hira GS, Balwinder-Singh S-Y, Sharma RK (2010) Halting the groundwater decline in North West India—which crop technologies will be winners? Adv Agron 109(2010):155–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain I, Hussain Z, Maqbool H, Akram SW, Farhan MF (2011) Water balance, supply and demand and irrigation efficiency of Indus basin. Pak Econ Soc Rev 49(1):13–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Jat ML, Chandna P, Gupta R, Sharma SK, Gill MA (2006) Laser land leveling: a precursor technology for resource conservation. In: Rice–Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, New Delhi, India. Rice-Wheat Consortium Technical Bulletin 7

  • Kahlown MA, Kemper WD (2005) Reducing water losses from channels using linings: costs and benefits in Pakistan. Agric Water Manag 74:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif M, Tariq JA (2009) Performance assessment of irrigation management transfer from government-managed to farmer-managed irrigation system: a case study. Irrig Drain 58:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laycock A, Swayne C, Marques JEJ (2005) Pehur High Level Canal, NWFP, Pakistan. J Water Manag

  • Lecina S, Playan E, Isidoro D, Dechmi F, Causape J, Faci JM (2005) Irrigation evaluation and simulation at the Irrigation District V of Bardenas (Spain). Agric Water Manag 73:223–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCornick PG (1993) Water management in arranged-demand canal. J Irrig Drain Eng 119(2):251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niblack M (2005) US Department of Interior—U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Yuma Area Office. Internal Report

  • Reddy JM (2013) Design of level-basin irrigation systems for robust performance. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 139(3):254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador R, Latorre B, Paniagua P, Playán E (2011) Farmers’ scheduling patterns in on-demand pressurized irrigation. Agric Water Manag 102:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarki A, Memon SQ, Lehghari M (2008) Comparison of different methods for computing seepage losses in earthen watercourse. Agricultura Tropica et SubTropica 41(4):197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Seckler D, Sampath RK, Raheja SK (1998) An index for measuring the performance of irrigation management systems with an application. Water Resour Bull 24(4):855–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelkoff TS, Clemmens AJ, Schmidt BV, Slosky EJ (1996) BORDER—a design and management aid for sloping border irrigation systems. WCL Report 21. US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Water Conservation Laboratory, Phoenix, AZ

  • Strelkoff TS, Clemmens AJ, Schmidt BV (1998) SRFR, Version 3.31—A model for simulating surface irrigation in borders, basins and furrows. US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Water Conservation Laboratory, Phoenix, AZ

  • Tyagi NK, Kaushal RK, Ram S, Samptah RK (2012) Towards determining the optimal size of unit irrigation command area. Int J Water Resour Dev 9(4):425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Conservation Service (2012). National Engineering Part 623 Irrigation Chapter 4

  • Wattenburger PL, Clyma W (1989a) Level basin design and management in the absence of water control part I: evaluation of completion-of-advance irrigation. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 32(2):838–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattenburger PL, Clyma W (1989b) Level basin design and management in the absence of water control part II: design method for completion-of-advance irrigation. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 32(2):844–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016) PK Punjab Irrig Agri Productivity Improvement Prog Phase-I. http://www.worldbank.org/projects/P125999/punjab-irrigation-productivity-improvement-program-project-phase-i?lang=en. Accessed 27 May 2015

  • Zeb J, Ahmad S, Aslam M, Badruddin. (2000) Evaluation of conveyance losses in three unlined watercourses of the Warsak gravity canal. Pak J Biol Sci 3(2):352–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The International Water Management Institute (IWMI) is in receipt of financial support from the Embassy of the Kingdom of Netherlands, Islamabad, Pakistan, through Grant #22294, the United Nations University, Institute of Sustainability and Peace Grant# 600UU 848 and the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) which were used in part to support this study. The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of research interns, Shamoil Bin Akram and Khan Abdul Hannan. The study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the results are exclusively those of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif A. Anwar.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Kassam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anwar, A.A., Ahmad, W., Bhatti, M.T. et al. The potential of precision surface irrigation in the Indus Basin Irrigation System. Irrig Sci 34, 379–396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0509-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0509-5

Keywords

Navigation