Skip to main content
Log in

18F-FDOPA PET/CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumours: Technical Note on a Preliminary Experience

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Aim

To review our preliminary experience with 6-l-18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) PET/CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).

Materials and Methods

Three patients (mean age 51.3 years; range 43–56) with gastro-entero pancreatic NET (GEP-NET) liver metastases underwent 18F-FDOPA PET/CT-guided RFA. Patients were referred with oligometastatic hepatic-confined disease (1–6 metastases; <3 cm) on 18F-FDOPA PET/CT; poor lesion visualisation on US, CT, and MR; and ongoing symptoms. Procedures were performed in an interventional PET/CT scanner under general anaesthesia using a split-dose protocol. Lesion characteristics, procedural duration and technical success (accurate probe placement and post-procedural ablation-zone photopaenia), complications, patient and operator dose, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Thirteen liver metastases (mean size 11.4 mm, range 8–16) were treated in three patients (two presented with “carcinoid syndrome”). Technical success was 100 % with a mean procedural duration of 173.3 min (range 90–210) and no immediate complications. Mean patient dose was 2844 mGy·cm (range 2104–3686). Operator and radiographer doses were acceptable other than the operator’s right hand in the first case (149 µSv); this normalised in the second case. There was no local tumour or extra-hepatic disease progression at mid-term follow-up (mean 12.6 months; range 6–20); however, two cases progressed with new liver metastases at different sites. There was 100 % clinical success (n = 2) in resolving carcinoid syndrome symptoms.

Conclusion

18F-FDOPA PET/CT-guided RFA appears technically feasible, safe, and effective in patients with GEP-NETs and low-burden hepatic metastases. Further prospective studies are required to elucidate its precise role in tailored multimodality management of GEP-NET liver metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, Jensen RT, de Herder WW, Thakker RV, Caplin M, Delle Fave G, Kaltsas GA, Krenning EP, Moss SF, Nilsson O, Rindi G, Salazar R, Ruszniewski P, Sundin A. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(1):61–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Modlin IM, Kidd M, Latich I, et al. Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1717–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaltsas GA, Besser GM, Grossman AB. The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:458–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Veenendaal LM, Borel Rinkes IH, Lips CJ, van Hillegersberg R. Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumours: early reduction of tumour load to improve life expectancy. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;26(4):35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Baere T, Arai Y, Lencioni R, Geschwind JF, Rilling W, Salem R, Matsui O, Soulen MC. Treatment of liver tumors with lipiodol TACE: technical recommendations from experts opinion. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2016;39(3):334–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Baere T, Deschamps F, Tselikas L, Ducreux M, Planchard D, Pearson E, Berdelou A, Leboulleux S, Elias D, Baudin E. GEP-NETs update: interventional radiology: role in the treatment of liver metastases from GEP-NETs. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(4):R151–66. doi:10.1530/EJE-14-0630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornelis F, Silk M, Schoder H, Takaki H, Durack JC, Erinjeri JP, Sofocleous CT, Siegelbaum RH, Maybody M, Solomon SB. Performance of intra-procedural 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT-guided biopsies for lesions suspected of malignancy but poorly visualized with other modalities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(12):2265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Carbonero R, Garcia-Figueiras R, Carmona-Bayonas A, Sevilla I, Teule A, Quindos M, Grande E, Capdevila J, Aller J, Arbizu J, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Spanish Cooperative Group of Neuroendocrine Tumors (GETNE). Imaging approaches to assess the therapeutic response of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): current perspectives and future trends of an exciting field in development. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34(4):823–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Flechsig P, Zechmann CM, Schreiweis J, Kratochwil C, Rath D, Schwartz LH, Schlemmer HP, Kauczor HU, Haberkorn U, Giesel FL. Qualitative and quantitative image analysis of CT and MR imaging in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases in comparison to (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(8):1593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan ER, Sofocleous CT, Schöder H, Carrasquillo JA, Nehmeh S, Larson SM, Thornton R, Siegelbaum RH, Erinjeri JP, Solomon SB. Split-dose technique for FDG PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation: a method to facilitate lesion targeting and to provide immediate assessment of treatment effectiveness. Radiology. 2013;268(1):288–95. doi:10.1148/radiol.13121462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Imperiale A, Garnon J, Bachellier P, Gangi A, Namer IJ. Simultaneous (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT-guided biopsy and radiofrequency ablation of recurrent neuroendocrine hepatic metastasis: further step toward a theranostic approach. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(6):e334–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel IJ, Davidson JC. Standards of Practice Committee, with Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Endorsement. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:S199–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin CJ. Personal dosimetry for interventional operators: when and how should monitoring be done? Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1003):639–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Prior JO, Kosinski M, Delaloye AB, Denys A. Initial report of PET/CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18(6):801–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tatli S, Gerbaudo VH, Mamede M, et al. Abdominal masses sampled at PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy: initial experience with registration of prior PET/CT images. Radiology. 2010;256:305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Venkatesan AM, Kadoury S, Abi-Jaoudeh N, et al. Real-time FDG PET guidance during biopsies and radiofrequency ablation using multimodality fusion with electromagnetic navigation. Radiology. 2011;260(3):848–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Klaeser B, Wiskirchen J, Wartenberg J, et al. PET/CT-guided biopsies of metabolically active bone lesions: applications and clinical impact. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(11):2027–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klaeser B, Mueller MD, Schmid RA, et al. PET-CT-guided interventions in the management of FDG-positive lesions in patients suffering from solid malignancies: initial experiences. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(7):1780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Govindarajan MJ, Nagaraj KR, Kallur KG, Sridhar PS. PET/CT guidance for percutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19:208–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tatli S, Gerbaudo VH, Feeley CM, et al. PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses: initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(4):507–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abi-Jaoudeh N, Mielekamp P, Noordhoek N, Venkatesan AM, Millo C, Radaelli A, Carelsen B, Wood BJ. Cone-beam computed tomography fusion and navigation for real-time positron emission tomography-guided biopsies and ablations: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):737–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis MA, Hubbard J. Multimodal liver-directed management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. Int J Hepatol. 2011;2011:452343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Persijn van Meerten E, Rodríguez R, Schneider K, Calzado A, Geleijns J, Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC, Tosi G. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Funded by the European Commission. Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP; 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Luigi Cazzato.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

All of the authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cazzato, R.L., Garnon, J., Ramamurthy, N. et al. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumours: Technical Note on a Preliminary Experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39, 1315–1321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1334-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1334-1

Keywords

Navigation