Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MRI-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Mediastinal Masses Using a Large Bore Magnet: Technical Feasibility

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses performed using a wide-bore high-field scanner.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study of 16 consecutive patients (8 male, 8 female; mean age 74 years) who underwent MRI-guided core needle biopsy of a mediastinal mass between February 2010 and January 2014. Size and location of lesion, approach taken, time for needle placement, overall duration of procedure, and post-procedural complications were evaluated. Technical success rates and correlation with surgical pathology (where available) were assessed.

Results

Target lesions were located in the anterior (n = 13), middle (n = 2), and posterior mediastinum (n = 1), respectively. Mean size was 7.2 cm (range 3.6–11 cm). Average time for needle placement was 9.4 min (range 3–18 min); average duration of entire procedure was 42 min (range 27–62 min). 2–5 core samples were obtained from each lesion (mean 2.6). Technical success rate was 100 %, with specimens successfully obtained in all 16 patients. There were no immediate complications. Histopathology revealed malignancy in 12 cases (4 of which were surgically confirmed), benign lesions in 3 cases (1 of which was false negative following surgical resection), and one inconclusive specimen (treated as inaccurate since repeat CT-guided biopsy demonstrated thymic hyperplasia). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in our study were 92.3, 100, 100, 66.7, and 87.5 %, respectively.

Conclusion

MRI-guided mediastinal biopsy is a safe procedure with high diagnostic accuracy, which may offer a non-ionizing alternative to CT guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Abbreviations

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

CT:

Computed tomography

PET:

Positron emission tomography

TP:

True positive

TN:

True negative

FP:

False positive

FN:

False negative

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PPV:

Positive predictive value

References

  1. Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA, Gerken G, Barkhausen J, Forsting M, Ladd ME. MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(12):2865–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lü Y, Liu M, Li C, Wu L, Fritz J. MRI-guided biopsy and aspiration in the head and neck: evaluation of 77 patients. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(2):404–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Genant JW, Vandevenne JE, Bergman AG, Beaulieu CF, Kee ST, Norbash AM, Lang P. Interventional musculoskeletal procedures performed by using MR imaging guidance with a vertically open MR unit: assessment of techniques and applicability. Radiology. 2002;223(1):127–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duckwiler G, Lufkin RB, Teresi L, Spickler E, Dion J, Viñuela F, Bentson J, Hanafee W. Head and neck lesions: MR-guided aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1989;170(2):519–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garnon J, Schlier A, Buy X, Tsoumakidou G, de Mathelin M, Breton E, et al. Evaluation of percutaneous biopsies of renal masses under MRI-guidance: a retrospective study about 26 cases. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(3):617–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY, Daniel BL, Razavi MK, Semba CP, Dake MD. Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(10):1323–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kariniemi J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Ojala R, Tervonen O. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(6):1256–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahrar JU, Stafford RJ, Alzubaidi S, Ahrar K. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in the musculoskeletal system using a cylindrical 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging unit. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;22(4):189–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lü Y, Fritz J, Li C, Liu M, Lee P, Wu L, Carrino JA. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses: diagnostic performance and safety. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(6):452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, Schwartzberg MS, Walker TG, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu M, Lv Y, Wu L, Song J, Sequeiros RB, Li C. MRI-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of small pulmonary nodules: feasibility. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(10):2730–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu S, Li C, Yu X, Liu M, Fan T, Chen D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(2):416–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bressler EL, Kirkham JA. Mediastinal masses: alternative approaches to CT-guided needle biopsy. Radiology. 1994;191(2):391–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Priola AM, Priola SM, Cataldi A, Ferrero B, Garofalo G, Errico L, Marci V, Fava C. CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses: evaluation of 73 procedures. Radiol Med. 2008;113(1):3–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Margerie-Mellon C, de Bazelaire C, Amorim S, Brice P, Tazi A, Brière J, Frija J, de Kerviler E. Diagnostic yield and safety of computed tomography-guided mediastinal core needle biopsies. J Thorac Imaging. 2015;30(5):319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, Gorantonaki A, Papailiou J. CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1479–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prosch H, Stadler A, Schilling M, Burklin S, Eisenhuber E, Schober E, Mostbeck G. CT fluoroscopy-guided vs. multislice CT biopsy mode-guided lung biopsies: accuracy, complications and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(5):1029–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guttikonda R, Herts BR, Dong F, Baker ME, Fenner KB, Pohlman B. Estimated radiation exposure and cancer risk from CT and PET/CT scans in patients with lymphoma. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(6):1011–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schiebler ML, Listerud J. Common artifacts encountered in thoracic magnetic resonance imaging: recognition, derivation, and solutions. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;4(3):1–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffmann R, Thomas C, Rempp H, Schmidt D, Pereira PL, Claussen CD, Clasen S. Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(3):663–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maurer MH, Schreiter N, de Bucourt M, Grieser C, Renz DM, Hartwig T, Hamm B, Streitparth F. Cost comparison of nerve root infiltration of the lumbar spine under MRI and CT guidance. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(6):1487–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Garnon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

J.G, N.R, J.C, G.E, E.B, G.T, P.R, A.G declare no conflict of interest or relevant disclosures.

Ethical Approval

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garnon, J., Ramamurthy, N., Caudrelier J, J. et al. MRI-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Mediastinal Masses Using a Large Bore Magnet: Technical Feasibility. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39, 761–767 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1246-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1246-5

Keywords

Navigation