Skip to main content
Log in

Downstream Hepatic Arterial Blood Pressure Changes Caused by Deployment of the Surefire AntiReflux Expandable Tip

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this work was to evaluate blood pressure changes caused by deployment of the Surefire antireflux expandable tip. The pressure measurements are relevant because they imply changes in hepatoenteric arterial blood flow within this liver compartment during hepatic artery delivery of cytotoxic agents.

Methods

After positioning the Surefire antireflux system in the targeted hepatic artery, blood pressure was obtained initially with the tip collapsed (or through a femoral artery sheath), then again after the tip was expanded before chemoembolization or yttrium 90 (90Y) radioembolization.

Results

Eighteen patients with liver malignancy underwent 29 procedures in 29 hepatic arteries (3 common hepatic, 22 lobar, 4 segmental). Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure were all decreased by a mean of 29 mm Hg (p = 0.000004), 14 mm Hg (p = 0.0000004), and 22 mm Hg (p = 0.00000001), respectively.

Conclusion

When the Surefire expandable tip is deployed to prevent retrograde reflux of agents, it also results in a significant decrease in blood pressure in the antegrade distribution, potentially resulting in hepatopedal blood flow in vessels that are difficult to embolize, such as the supraduodenal arteries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. López-Benítez R, Richter GM, Kauczor H-U et al (2009) Analysis of nontarget embolization mechanisms during embolization and chemoembolization procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:615–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murthy R, Brown DB, Salem R et al (2007) Gastrointestinal complications associated with hepatic arterial yttrium-90 microsphere therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:553–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM et al (2009) Complications following radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: A comprehensive literature review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1121–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy AS, McNeillie P, Dezarn WA et al (2009) Treatment parameters and outcome in 680 treatments of internal radiation with resin 90Y-microspheres for unresectable hepatic tumors. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 74:1494–1500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF et al (2010) Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive report of long-term outcomes. Gastroenterology 138:52–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R et al (2011) Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages: A European evaluation. Hepatology 54:868–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bester L, Meteling B, Pavlakis N, Chua TC, Saxena A, Morris DL (2012) Radioembolization versus standard care of hepatic metastases: Comparative retrospective cohort study of survival outcomes and adverse events of salvage patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:96–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu DM, Salem R, Bui JT et al (2005) Angiographic considerations in patients undergoing liver-directed therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:911–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewandowski RJ, Sato KT, Atassi B et al (2007) Radioembolization with 90Y microspheres: angiographic and technical considerations. Cardiovasc Invervent Radiol 30:571–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong K, Chomas J, Kraitchman D, Naglreiter B, Arepathy A (2011) Quantification and reduction of reflux during embolotherapy using Micro CT and Tantalum Beads with ex-vivo analysis. World Conference of Interventional Oncology, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rose SC, Lim GM, Arellano RS, Easter DB, Roberts AC (1998) Temporary splenic artery balloon occlusion for protection of nonsplenic vascular beds during splenic embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1186–1188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rose SC, Kikolski SG, Nutting CW, Sze DY (2012) Relationship of aortoceliac angle and the ability to advance a Surefire® Guidecath into the targeted hepatic artery. [Abstract 550209]. Global Embolization Symposium and Therapy Annual Meeting, New York

  13. Nakamura H, Hashimoto T, Oi H, Sawada S, Furui S (1991) Prevention of gastric complications in hepatic arterial chemoembolization. Balloon catheter occlusion technique. Acta Radiol 32:81–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahvash A, Zaer N, Shaw C, Chasen B, Avritscher R, Murthy R (2012) Temporary balloon occlusion of the common hepatic artery for administration of yttrium-90 resin microspheres in a patient with patent hepatoenteric collaterals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:277–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haydar AA, Wasan H, Wilson C, Tait P (2010) 90Y Radioembolization: Embolization of the gastroduodenal artery is not always appropriate. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:1069–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdelmaksoud MHK, Hwang GL, Louie JD et al (2010) Development of new hepaticoenteric collateral pathways after hepatic arterial skeletonization in preparation for yttrium-90 radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:1385–1395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bilbao JI, Garrastachu P, Herráiz MJ et al (2010) Safety and efficacy assessment of flow redistribution by occlusion of intrahepatic vessels prior to radioembolization in the treatment of liver tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:523–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express gratitude to Azniv Zeronian for assistance in preparation of this manuscript and to Lori-Ann Santamaria, Surefire Medical for assistance with statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

S. C. Rose has a potential conflicts of interest in having been a speaker for this company and potentially developing a patent for the SIS device. J. Chomas is a stockholder and CEO of Surefire Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Rose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, S.C., Kikolski, S.G. & Chomas, J.E. Downstream Hepatic Arterial Blood Pressure Changes Caused by Deployment of the Surefire AntiReflux Expandable Tip. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 1262–1269 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0538-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0538-2

Keywords

Navigation