Endovascular Acute Stroke Treatment Performed by Vascular Interventional Radiologists: Is It Safe and Efficacious?
- Lars FjetlandAffiliated withDepartment of Radiology, Stavanger University HospitalThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital Email author
- , Sumit RoyAffiliated withDepartment of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital
- , Kathinka D. KurzAffiliated withDepartment of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital
- , Jan Petter LarsenAffiliated withThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University HospitalDepartment of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital
- , Martin W. KurzAffiliated withThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University HospitalDepartment of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neurointerventional procedures in acute stroke patients performed by a team of vascular interventional radiologists in close cooperation with diagnostic neuroradiologists and stroke neurologists and to compare the results with those of previous reports from centres with specialised interventional neuroradiologists.
Material and Methods
A total of 39 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion not responding to or not eligible for intravenous thrombolysis were treated with either intra-arterial thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy (Penumbra System or solitaire FR thrombectomy system, respectively) and included in our prospective study. Outcomes were measured using the modified Rankin scale after 90 days, and recanalization was assessed by thrombolysis using the myocardial infarction score.
Mean patient age was 68.3 ± 14.2 years; the average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at hospital admission was 17.2 (SD = 6.2 [n = 38]). Successful recanalization was achieved in 74.4 % of patients. Median time from clinical onset to recanalization was 5 h 11 min. Procedure-related complications occurred in 5 % of patients, and 7.5 % had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Of the patients, 22.5 % died within the first 90 postprocedural days, 5 % of these from cerebral causes. Patients who were successfully recanalized had a clinical better outcome at follow-up than those in whom treatment failed. Of the patients, 35.9 % had an mRS score ≤2 after 90 days.
Our results are in line with those in the published literature and show that a treatment strategy with general interventional radiologists performing neurointerventional procedures in acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusions can be achieved to the benefit of patients.
KeywordsNeurointerventions Endovascular treatment Thrombectomy Thrombolysis Stroke therapy
- Endovascular Acute Stroke Treatment Performed by Vascular Interventional Radiologists: Is It Safe and Efficacious?
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 35, Issue 5 , pp 1029-1035
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Endovascular treatment
- Stroke therapy
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
- 2. The Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
- 3. Department of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4068, Stavanger, Norway