Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective Validation of Optimal Drain Management “The 3 × 3 Rule” after Liver Resection

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We previously established an optimal postoperative drain management rule after liver resection (i.e., drain removal on postoperative day 3 if the drain fluid bilirubin concentration is <3 mg/dl) from the results of 514 drains of 316 consecutive patients. This test set predicts that 274 of 316 patients (87.0 %) will be safely managed without adverse events when drain management is performed without deviation from the rule.

Objective

To validate the feasibility of our rule in recent time period.

Methods

The data from 493 drains of 274 consecutive patients were prospectively collected. Drain fluid volumes, bilirubin levels, and bacteriological cultures were measured on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7. The drains were removed according to the management rule. The achievement rate of the rule, postoperative adverse events, hospital stay, medical costs, and predictive value for reoperation according to the rule were validated.

Results

The rule was achieved in 255 of 274 (93.1 %) patients. The drain removal time was significantly shorter [3 days (1–30) vs. 7 (2–105), p < 0.01], drain fluid infection was less frequent [4 patients (1.5 %) vs. 58 (18.4 %), p < 0.01], postoperative hospital stay was shorter [11 days (6–73) vs. 16 (9–59), p = 0.04], and medical costs were decreased [1453 USD (968–6859) vs. 1847 (4667–9498), p < 0.01] in the validation set compared with the test set. Five patients who required reoperation were predicted by the drain-based information and treated within 2 days after operation.

Conclusions

Our 3 × 3 rule is clinically feasible and allows for the early removal of the drain tube with minimum infection risk after liver resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong Y, Ng IO, Lam CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S, Rees M, Vauthey JN, Hugh TJ et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for liver surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB. 17:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Franco D, Karaa A, Meakins JL, Borgonovo G, Smadja C, Grange D (1989) Hepatectomy without abdominal drainage: results of a prospective study in 61 patients. Ann Surg 210:748–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A, Vilgrain V, Panis Y, Fekete F (1993) Drainage after elective hepatic resection: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 218:748–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, Heffernan N, Blumgart LH (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu L, Sun HC, Qin LX, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N et al (2006) Abdominal drainage was unnecessary after hepatectomy using the conventional clamp crushing technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 10:302–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg 93:422–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 149:680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ et al (2011) Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 13:528–535

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Moriguchi M, Mitsuka Y, Okada S, Midorikawa Y et al (2012) Criteria for drain removal following liver resection. Br J Surg 99:1584–1590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, Harihara Y, Hui AM, Sano K et al (2001) Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg 136:922–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Imamura H, Takayama T, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Aoki T, Kaneko J et al (2002) Pringle`s maneuver in living donors. Lancet 360:2049–2050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Kimura Y, Moriguchi M, Higaki T, Nakayama H et al (2011) Transfusion criteria for fresh frozen plasma in liver resection: a 3 + 3 cohort expansion study. Arch Surg 146:1293–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayashi Y, Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Moriguchi M, Ohkubo T, Nakayama H et al (2011) Validation of perioperative steroids administration in liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 253:50–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Nakamura M, Higaki T, Matsuoka S, Mizuno S et al (2014) Prophylactic impact of endoscopic treatment for esophageal varices in liver resection: a prospective study. J Gastroenterol 49:917–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M, Kirchberg J, Dutlu M, Mehrabi A et al (2012) Bilirubin level in the drainage fluid is an early and independent predictor of clinically relevant bile leakage after hepatic resection. Surgery 152:821–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Torzilli G, Olivari N, Del Fabbro D, Gambetti A, Leoni P, Gendarini A et al (2005) Bilirubin level fluctuation in drain discharge after hepatectomies justifies long-term drain maintenance. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1206–1210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, Masui H, Endo I, Sekido H et al (2003) Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg 27:695–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamashita Y, Hamatsu T, Rikimaru T, Tanaka S, Shirabe K, Shimada M et al (2001) Bile leakage after hepatic resection. Ann Surg 233:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shintaro Yamazaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitsuka, Y., Yamazaki, S., Yoshida, N. et al. Prospective Validation of Optimal Drain Management “The 3 × 3 Rule” after Liver Resection. World J Surg 40, 2213–2220 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3523-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3523-0

Keywords

Navigation