Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in a Chinese Breast Cancer Population with 1–2 Positive Sentinel Nodes: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We have developed a new nomogram to predict the probability of a patient with 1–2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to present further axillary disease.

Methods

Data were collected from 480 patients who were diagnosed with 1–2 positive lymph nodes and thus underwent axillary lymph node dissection between March 2005 and June 2011. Clinical and pathological features of the patients were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. The Shanghai Cancer Center Non-SLN nomogram (SCC-NSLN) was created from the logistic regression model. This new model was subsequently applied to 481 patients from July 2011 to December 2013. The predictive accuracy of the SCC-NSLN nomogram was measured by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Based on the results of the univariate analysis, the variables that were significantly associated with the incidence of non-SLN metastasis in an SLN-positive patient included lymphovascular invasion, neural invasion, the number of positive SLNs, the number of negative SLNs, and the size of SLN metastasis (P < 0.05). Using multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion, the number of positive SLNs, the number of negative SLNs, and the size of SLN metastasis were identified as independent predictors of non-SLN metastasis. The SCC-NSLN nomogram was then developed using these four variables. The new model was accurate and discriminating on both the modeling and validation groups (AUC: 0.7788 vs 0.7953). The false-negative rates of the SCC-NSLN nomogram were 3.54 and 9.29 % for the predicted probability cut-off points of 10 and 15 % when applied to patients who have 1–2 positive SLNs.

Conclusion

The SCC-NSLN nomogram could serve as an acceptable clinical tool in clinical discussions with patients. The omission of ALND might be possible if the probability of non-SLN involvement is <10 and <15 % in accordance with the acceptable risk determined by medical staff and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al (2007) Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8:881–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M et al (2006) Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:599–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al (2006) Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 7:983–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Purushotham AD, Upponi S, Klevesath MB, Bobrow L, Millar K, Myles JP, Duffy SW (2005) Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 23:4312–4321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al (1997) Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R (1997) Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2345–2350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T et al (1998) The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 339:941–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med 347(8):567–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orr RK (1999) The impact of prophylactic axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival—a Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 6(1):109–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S et al (2005) Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Bianco P, Zavagno G, Burelli P et al (2008) Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: results of the sentinella–GIVOM Italian randomised clinical trial. EJSO. 34:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO et al (2009) Breast cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7:122–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S et al (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 14(4):297–305

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB et al (2014) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 32(13):1365–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan L, Zheng Y, Yu KD et al (2009) Breast cancer in a transitional society over 18 years: trends and present status in Shanghai. China. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 117(2):409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guenther JM, Hansen NM, DiFronzo LA et al (2003) Axillary dissection is not required for all patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel nodes. Arch Surg 138(1):52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yi M, Giordano SH, Meric-Bernstam F et al (2010) Trends in and outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs. SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer patients: experience from the SEER database. Ann Surg Oncol 17(Suppl 3):343–351

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Wely BJ, Teerenstra S, Schinagl DA et al (2011) Systematic review of the effect of external beam radiation therapy to the breast on axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. Br J Surg 98(3):326–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. American Cancer Society (2007) Breast cancer facts and figures 2007–2008. American Cancer Society Inc, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen JY, Chen JJ, Yang BL et al (2012) Predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in a Chinese breast cancer population: assessment of an existing nomogram and a new predictive nomogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135(3):839–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz A, Smith BL, Golshan M et al (2008) Nomogram for the prediction of having four or more involved nodes for sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(13):2093–2098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10(10):1140–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) The American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Recommendations for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(30):7703–7720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rutgers EJ (2008) Sentinel node biopsy: interpretation and management of patients with immunohistochemistrypositive sentinel nodes and those with micrometastases. J Clin Oncol 26(5):698–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fant JS, Grant MD, Knox SM et al (2003) Preliminary outcome analysis in patients with breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node who declined axillary dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 10(2):126–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guenther JM, Hansen NM, DiFronzo LA et al (2003) Axillary dissection is not required for all patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel nodes. Arch Surg 138(1):52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hwang RF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Yi M et al (2007) Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection. Cancer 110(4):723–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeruss JS, Winchester DJ, Sener SF et al (2005) Axillary recurrence after sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 12(1):34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Langer I, Marti WR, Guller U et al (2005) Axillary recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph node(SLN) or SLN micrometastases: prospective analysis of 150 patients after SLN biopsy. Ann Surg 241(1):152–158

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M et al (2004) The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures. Ann Surg 240(3):462–468

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Poirier E, Sideris L, Dubé P et al (2008) Analysis of clinical applicability of the breast cancer nomogram for positive sentinel lymph node: the canadian experience. Ann Surg Oncol 15(9):2562–2567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the studied women for their willingness to cooperate with our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiong Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Jia-ying Chen and Jia-jian Chen have contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Jy., Chen, Jj., Xue, Jy. et al. Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in a Chinese Breast Cancer Population with 1–2 Positive Sentinel Nodes: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram. World J Surg 39, 2919–2927 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3189-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3189-z

Keywords

Navigation