Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conservative Treatment in Selected Patients with Severe Critical Limb Ischemia

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the outcome of conservative treatment of severe critical limb ischemia (CLI) classified as Rutherford 5/6.

Background

The preferred therapy for CLI is either endovascular revascularization or bypass surgery. With a growing aged population with more serious comorbidities, these therapies are not always a viable option. Primary amputation leads to decreased mobility and a reduced quality of life. There is a lack of literature regarding the outcome of conservative therapy.

Methods

Hospital charts were reviewed of all patients who were diagnosed with Rutherford classification 5–6 and received conservative treatment and lacked interventional options. Outcome measures were mortality, complete wound closure, and limb salvage rate.

Results

38 patients were included with a median age of 80 years (range 57–97). The amputation rate during follow-up was 16 %. In 58 % of patients, complete wound closure was achieved. All-cause mortality was 58 % with a 2-year survivability rate of 55 %.

Conclusions

Conservative management in our selected patients with CLI results in a moderate rate of wound closure and acceptable amputation rates albeit with a high mortality rate. For patients not eligible for endovascular revascularization or bypass surgery, conservative treatment could be a viable option besides primary limb amputation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG et al (2007) Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33(Suppl 1):S1–S75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hankey GJ (2005) Vascular disease of the heart, brain and limbs: new insights into a looming epidemic. Lancet 366(9499):1753–1754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pomposelli FB, Kansal N, Hamdan AD, Belfield A, Sheahan M, Campbell DR et al (2003) A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1000 cases. J Vasc Surg 37(2):307–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF et al (2005) Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366(9501):1925–1934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Leur K, van Zeeland ML, Ho GH, de Groot HG, Veen EJ, van der Laan L (2012) Treatment for critical lower limb ischemia in elderly patients. World J Surg 36(12):2937–2943. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1758-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andraeni D (1991) Second European Consensus Document on chronic critical leg ischemia. Circulation, 84(Suppl 4):1–26

  7. Hiatt WR (2001) Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication. N Engl J Med 344(21):1608–1621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teraa M, Sprengers RW, van der Graaf Y, Peters CE, Moll FL, Verhaar MC (2013) Autologous bone marrow-derived cell therapy in patients with critical limb ischemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Ann Surg 258(6):922–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitz-Henry J (2011) The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(3):185–187

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organisation Pain Ladder .http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en/. Accessed 8 Feb 2015

  11. Marston WA, Davies SW, Armstrong B, Farber MA, Mendes RC, Fulton JJ et al (2006) Natural history of limbs with arterial insufficiency and chronic ulceration treated without revascularization. J Vasc Surg 44(1):108–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD (2008) A study of biofilm-based wound management in subjects with critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care 17(4):145–8, 50–2, 54–5

  13. Ruangsetakit C, Chinsakchai K, Mahawongkajit P, Wongwanit C, Mutirangura P (2010) Transcutaneous oxygen tension: a useful predictor of ulcer healing in critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care 19(5):202–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nehler MR, Hiatt WR, Taylor LM Jr (2003) Is revascularization and limb salvage always the best treatment for critical limb ischemia? J Vasc Surg 37(3):704–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lepantalo M, Matzke S (1996) Outcome of unreconstructed chronic critical leg ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11(2):153–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosma J, Vahl A, Wisselink W (2013) Systematic review on health-related quality of life after revascularization and primary amputation in patients with critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg 27(8):1105–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our specialized wound care practitioners for their help with delivering the necessary data.

Disclosure

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriaan R. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, A.R., Raats, J.W., Lensvelt, M.M.A. et al. Conservative Treatment in Selected Patients with Severe Critical Limb Ischemia. World J Surg 39, 2090–2095 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3069-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3069-6

Keywords

Navigation