Skip to main content
Log in

Patient Attitudes toward Transaxillary Robot-assisted Thyroidectomy

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The transaxillary robot-assisted technique constitutes an acceptable treatment option for patients requiring thyroidectomy. However, patients’ attitudes toward this new technique have not yet been analyzed.

Methods

A sample of 596 randomly selected patients who underwent thyroidectomy between January 2000 and March 2010 was assessed. We evaluated patients’ attitudes toward transaxillary robot-assisted thyroidectomy, taking into account the validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire, the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire, and 11 sociodemographic and surgical patient characteristics.

Results

Only 11.6 % of the patients would prefer to have been treated with the transaxillary method. Most patients had concerns that it would be a more painful procedure (39.2 %), and they expressed satisfaction with the existing esthetic outcome (29.1 %); other concerns were that the robotic approach would be of longer duration (25.4 %) and at higher cost (15.5 %). Nevertheless, the worse the appearance of the neck scar the more preferable is the new method (p = 0.025), a result that holds true irrespective of patients’ physical health, the invasive procedure attained (conventional or minimal), and the presence of postoperative complications, among other characteristics. Patients diagnosed with a benign or uncertain neoplasm (p = 0.022) and younger patients (p = 0.003) held a more positive view of the new method.

Conclusions

Patients who have undergone conventional thyroidectomy via the usual neck incision do not express a preference for the transaxillary method. The reasons given include various perceived disadvantages of the robotic procedure (increased pain, longer operative times, and higher cost). Younger patients, patients with poor appearance of their neck scar, and patients with benign thyroid pathology seem to hold a more positive attitude toward the robotic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH et al (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach. J Am Coll Surg 209:e1–e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS et al (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23:2399–2406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH et al (2009) Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery 146:1048–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seybt M, Kuppersmith RB, Holsinger FC et al (2010) Robotic axillary thyroidectomy: multi-institutional clinical experience with the daVinci. Laryngoscope 120(Suppl 4):S182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Foley CS, Agcaoglu O, Siperstein AE et al (2012) Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique. Surg Endosc 26:2259–2266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kandil E, Noureldine S, Abdel Khalek M et al (2011) Initial experience using robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy for Graves’ disease. J Visc Surg 148:e447–e451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang SW, Park JH, Jeong JS et al (2011) Prospects of robotic thyroidectomy using a gasless, transaxillary approach for the management of thyroid carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:223–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuppersmith RB, Holsinger FC (2011) Robotic thyroid surgery: an initial experience with North American patients. Laryngoscope 121:521–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Lee JH, Nah KY et al (2011) Comparison of endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1439–1446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunaud L, Germain A, Zarnegar R et al (2010) Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless transaxillary approach: cosmetic improvement or improved quality of surgical dissection? J Visc Surg 147:e399–e402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lang BH, Chow MP (2011) A comparison of surgical outcomes between endoscopic and robotically assisted thyroidectomy: the authors’ initial experience. Surg Endosc 25:1617–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landry CS, Grubbs EG, Morris GS et al (2011) Robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS) for the removal of thyroid and parathyroid glands. Surgery 149:549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duncan TD, Rashid Q, Speights F et al (2009) Transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy: an alternative to traditional open thyroidectomy. J Natl Med Assoc 101:783–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang SW, Lee SH, Ryu HR et al (2010) Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surgery 148:1214–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH et al (2011) The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:226–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holsinger FC, Terris DJ, Kuppersmith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: operative technique using a transaxillary endoscopic approach without CO2 insufflation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 43:381–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB et al (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20:1327–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Linos D, Economopoulos KP, Kiriakopoulos A et al (2012) Scar perceptions after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: comparison of minimal and conventional approaches. Surgery 153:400–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Economopoulos KP, Petralias A, Linos E et al (2012) Psychometric evaluation of patient scar assessment questionnaire following thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Thyroid 22:145–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Linos A, Kiriakopoulos A, Poulios E (2010) Scarless neck by conducting robot-assisted thyroidectomy: our initial experience. Endocr Abstr 22:832

    Google Scholar 

  21. Linos D (2011) Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: a comprehensive appraisal of existing techniques. Surgery 150:17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Henry JF (2008) Minimally invasive thyroid and parathyroid surgery is not a question of length of the incision. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:621–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Linos D (2009) Minimally invasive thyroid surgery. In: Frezza EE, Gagner M, Li M (eds) International principles of laparoscopic surgery, 1st edn. Ciné-Med Inc, Woodbury, CT, pp 531–537

    Google Scholar 

  24. Linos D (2012) Minimally invasive non endoscopic thyroidectomy: the MINET approach. In: Linos D, Chung WY (eds) Minimally invasive thyroidectomy, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M et al (1999) Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid small nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest 22:849–851

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seybt MW, Terris DJ (2010) Minimally invasive thyroid and parathyroid surgery: where are we now and where are we going? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 43:375–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW (2009) The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1481–1489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B (1998) Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 51:903–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B et al (1998) The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M et al. (1993) SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide, Boston, Massachusetts, The Health Institute, New England Medical Center

  31. Landry CS, Grubbs EG, Warneke CL et al (2012) Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery in the United States: is it comparable to open thyroid lobectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 19:1269–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kiriakopoulos A, Linos D (2012) Gasless transaxillary robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: exploring the frontiers of scarless thyroidectomy through a preliminary comparison study. Surg Endosc 26:2797–2801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Linos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linos, D., Kiriakopoulos, A. & Petralias, A. Patient Attitudes toward Transaxillary Robot-assisted Thyroidectomy. World J Surg 37, 1959–1965 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2090-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2090-x

Keywords

Navigation