Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective Evaluation of Early Follow-up Chest Radiography after Penetrating Thoracic Injury

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Background

In asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic trauma and a normal initial chest x-ray, successive prospective trials have decreased the minimum observation period required for exclusion of significant injury from 6 to 3 h. Despite the quality of these studies, this interval remains arbitrary and the true requisite observation time for safe discharge remains unknown. The current study evaluates the ability of “early” repeat chest x-ray, at intervals approaching 1 h, to exclude clinically significant injury.

Methods

Eighty-eight, asymptomatic patients with penetrating chest trauma and normal initial chest radiographs were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients received an “early” follow-up chest x-ray, at a median interval of 1 h and 34 min (interquartile range: 1 h 35 min to 2 h 22 min), and a second repeat x-ray at a “delayed” interval no earlier than 3 h postadmission. Radiographic abnormalities in clinically stable patients were followed with serial examination and repeat imaging for a minimum of 6 h. All patients received both “early” and “delayed” repeat CXRs with no patient discharged before full assessment.

Results

One of the 88 patients with initially normal chest x-ray underwent tube thoracostomy at the discretion of the attending surgeon before any repeat imaging. Of the remaining patients, 4 of 87 (4.6 %) demonstrated radiographic abnormalities on “early” repeat imaging. Two patients had pneumothoraces, successfully managed without intervention; the remaining two demonstrated evidence of hemothorax, subsequently undergoing tube thoracostomy. Two more patients (2.3  %) developed pneumothoraces on “delayed” imaging, both successfully observed without intervention.

Conclusions

In asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic trauma and normal initial chest radiographs, “early” repeat chest x-ray, at intervals approaching 1 h, appears sufficient to exclude clinically significant pathology and to allow safe patient discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hegarty MM (1976) A conservative approach to penetrating injuries of the chest: experience with 131 successive cases. Injury 8:53–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McLatchie GR, Campbell C, Hutchison JS (1980) Pneumothorax of late onset after chest stabbings. Injury 11:331–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerr TM, Sood R, Buckman RF, Gelman J, Grosh J (1989) Prospective trial of the six hour rule in stab wounds of the chest. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169:223–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiev J, Kerstein MD (1992) Role of three hour roentgenogram of the chest in penetrating and nonpenetrating injuries of the chest. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:249–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weigelt JA, Aurbakken CM, Meier DE, Thal ER (1982) Management of asymptomatic patients following stab wounds to the chest. J Trauma 22:291–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seamon MJ, Medina CR, Pieri PG et al (2008) Follow-up after asymptomatic penetrating thoracic injury: 3 hours is enough. J Trauma 65:549–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shatz DV, de la Pedraja J, Erbella J, Hameed M, Vail SJ (2001) Efficacy of follow-up evaluation in penetrating thoracic injuries: 3- vs. 6-hour radiographs of the chest. J Emerg Med 20:281–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Muckart DJ (1985) Delayed pneumothorax and haemothorax following observation for stab wounds of the chest. Injury 16:247–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perlmutt LM, Braun SD, Newman GE, Oke EJ, Dunnick NR (1986) Timing of chest film follow-up after transthoracic needle aspiration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:1049–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Derlet R, Richards J, Kravitz R (2001) Frequent overcrowding in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 8:151–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Henneman PL, Nathanson BH, Li H et al (2010) Emergency department patients who stay more than 6 hours contribute to crowding. J Emerg Med 39:105–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ball CG, Dente CJ, Kirkpatrick AW et al (2010) Occult pneumothoraces in patients with penetrating trauma: does mechanism matter? Can J Surg 53:251–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Varin DSE, Ringburg AN, van Lieshout EMM, Patka P, Schipper IB (2009) Accuracy of conventional imaging of penetrating torso injuries in the trauma resuscitation room. Eur J Emerg Med 16:305–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zehtabchi S, Morley EJ, Sajed D, Greenberg O, Sinert R (2009) Delayed pneumothorax after stab wound to thorax and upper abdomen: truth or myth? Injury 40:40–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, Schroeppel TJ et al (2007) Initial chest CT obviates the need for repeat chest radiograph after penetrating thoracic trauma. Am Surg 73:569–572 Discussion 572–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Inaba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, R.J., Inaba, K., Recinos, G. et al. Prospective Evaluation of Early Follow-up Chest Radiography after Penetrating Thoracic Injury. World J Surg 37, 1286–1290 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2002-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2002-0

Keywords

Navigation