Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilization of a Non-preserved Cadaver to Address Deficiencies in Technical Skills During the Third Year of Medical School: A Cadaver Model for Teaching Technical Skills

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Emergency technical procedures performed by medical students have decreased in the last decade. An Emergency Surgical Skills Laboratory (ESSL) using a non-preserved cadaver was developed in response to address this deficiency.

Methods

A total of 232 students rotating through a 6-week surgery clerkship participated in the ESSL from 1 July 2008 to 1 July 2011. Two four-hour sessions using case-based trauma scenarios in the ESSL served as a model for procedural instruction. Skills taught included basic suturing, intubation, cricothyrotomy, chest tube placement, thoracentesis, venous access, central line, and radial arterial line placement.

Results

Students noted that technical proficiency in suturing was obtained during the ESSL sessions in comparison to the emergency department or operating room (p < 0.001) during the 6-week clerkship. During the 6-week rotation only 12 % of students participated in chest tube insertion, 5 % central venous line placement, and 14 % femoral vein blood draw. Finally, 90 % of respondents reported increased understanding and comfort in regard to trauma resuscitation following the ESSL.

Conclusions

Technical procedural proficiency has become increasingly difficult to obtain in medical school due to multifactorial limitations. The ESSL provides an opportunity for developing technical skills needed for emergency situations not otherwise provided during the surgical clerkship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Dent JA (2001) Current trends and future implications in the developing role of clinical skills centres. Med Teach 23:483–489

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DiMaggio PJ, Waer AL, Desmarais TJ et al (2010) The use of a lightly preserved cadaver and full thickness pig skin to teach technical skills on the surgery clerkship—a response to the economic pressures facing academic medicine today. Am J Surg 200:162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graber MA, Pierre J, Charlton M (2003) Patient opinions and attitudes toward medical student procedures in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 10:1329–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Margrane D, Gannon J, Miller CT (1994) Obstetric patients who select and those who refuse medical students’ participation in their care. Acad Med 69:1004–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott DJ (2006) Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical simulation. Simul Healthcare 1:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridges M, Diamond DL (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Babineau TJ, Becker J, Gibbons G et al (2004) The “cost” of operative training for surgical residents. Arch Surg 139:366–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Windsor JA (2009) Role of simulation in surgical education and training. ANZ J Surg 79:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakayama DK, Steiber A (1990) Surgery interns’ experience with surgical procedures as medical students. Am J Surg 159:341–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore MJ, Bennet CL (1995) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 170:55–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Ann Surg 236:458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J et al (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12:213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holland JP, Waugh L, Horgan A et al (2011) Cadaveric hands-on training for surgical specialties: is this back to the future for surgical skills development? J Surg Educ 68:110–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berman JR, Ben-Artzi A, Fisher MC et al (2012) A comparison of arthrocentesis teaching tools: cadavers, synthetic joint models, and the relative utility of different educational modalities in improving trainees’ comfort with procedures. J Clin Rheumatol 18:175–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fourre MW (2002) The performance of procedures on the recently deceased. Acad Emerg Med 9:595–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin M, Scalabrini B, Rioux A et al (2003) Training fourth-year medical students in critical invasive skills improves subsequent patient safety. Am Surg 69:437–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Adamas-Rappaport.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, S.J., Carroll, J.T., Nematollahi, S. et al. Utilization of a Non-preserved Cadaver to Address Deficiencies in Technical Skills During the Third Year of Medical School: A Cadaver Model for Teaching Technical Skills. World J Surg 37, 953–955 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1905-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1905-0

Keywords

Navigation