Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Micro-Credit and Community Wildlife Management: Complementary Strategies to Improve Conservation Outcomes in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community wildlife management programs in African protected areas aim to deliver livelihood and social benefits to local communities in order to bolster support for their conservation objectives. Most of these benefits are delivered at the community level. However, many local people are also seeking more individual or household-level livelihood benefits from community wildlife management programs because it is at this level that many of the costs of protected area conservation are borne. Because community wildlife management delivers few benefits at this level, support for their conservation objectives amongst local people often declines. The study investigated the implications of this for reducing poaching in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Three community wildlife management initiatives undertaken by Park management were compared with regard to their capacity to deliver the individual and household-level benefits sought by local people: community conservation services, wildlife management areas and community conservation banks. Interviews were carried out with poachers and local people from four villages in the Western Serengeti including members of village conservation banks, as well as a number of key informants. The results suggest that community conservation banks could, as a complementary strategy to existing community wildlife management programs, potentially provide a more effective means of reducing poaching in African protected areas than community wildlife management programs alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A, Gibson CC (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Dev 27(4):629–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson CL, Locker L, Nugent R (2002) Microcredit, social capital, and common pool resources. World Dev 30(1):95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcese P, Hando J, Campbell K (1995) Historical and present-day anti-poaching efforts in Serengeti. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese PJ (eds) Serengeti II. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p 506–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2007) The economic lives of the poor. J Econ Perspect 21(1):141–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett CB, Brandon K, Gibson C, Gjertsen H (2001) Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions. Bioscience 51(6):497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitanyi S, Nesje M, Kusiluka LJM, Chenyambuga SW, Kaltenborn BP (2012) Awareness and perceptions of local people about wildlife hunting in western Serengeti communities. Trop Conserv Sci 5(2):208–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks JS, Waylen KA, Mulder MB (2012) How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:21265–21270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cawthorn D-M, Hoffman LC (2015) The bushmeat and food security nexus: a global account of the contributions, conundrums and ethical collisions. Food Res Int 76:906–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K, Nelson V, Loibooki M (2001) Sustainable use of wildland resources: ecological, economic and social interactions. An analysis of illegal hunting of wildlife in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Department of International Development (DFID),Animal Health Program and Livestock Production Programmes,Final Technical Report, Project R7050, Natural Resources Institute (NRI), Chatham, Kent

  • Child B (1996) The practice and principles of community-based wildlife management in Zimbabwe: the CAMPFIRE programme. Biodivers Conserv 5(3):369–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerton L (2001) The nature of benefits and the benefits of nature: why wildlife conservation has not economically benefited communities in Africa. In: Hulme D, Murphree M (eds) African wildlife and livelihoods. The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation, James Currey Ltd, Oxford, p 208–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius C, Collins S (2007) Community-based natural resource management: governing the commons. Water Policy 9:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Naiman LC, Lowassa A, Randall D, Rentsch D (2014) Explanatory factors for household involvement in illegal bushmeat hunting around Serengeti, Tanzania. J Nat Conserv 22:491–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt Zoological Society (FZS) (2014) The Serengeti Ecosytem Management Project (SAMP): Community Conservation Banks. http://www.zgf.de/?projectId=121&id=65&language=en. Accessed 25 Feb 2014

  • Frankfurt Zoological Society (FZS) (2016) Serengeti Ecosystem Management. Community Conservation Banks COCOBAs. https://sema.fzs.org/en/conservation-banks/. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Gibbes C, Keys E (2010) The illusion of equity: an examination of community based natural resource management and inequality in Africa. Geogr Compass 4(9):1324–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CC, Marks SA (1995) Transforming rural hunters into conservationists—an assessment of community-based wildlife management programs in Africa. World Dev 23(6):941–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girabi F, Mwakaje AEG (2013) Impact of microfinance on smallholder farm productivity in Tanzania: the case of Iramba district. Asian Econ Financ Rev 3(2):227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy REA, Undurraga D, Wilkie V, Reyes-Garcia T, Huanca WR, Leonard T, McDade T, Tanner S, Vadez V, Team TBS (2010) The effect of wealth and real income on wildlife consumption among native Amazonians in Bolivia: estimates of annual trends with longitudinal household data (2002–2006). Anim Conserv 13(3):265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber J (2010) Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environ Manage 45:52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head BW (2007) Community engagement: participation on whose terms? Aust J Political Sci 42(3):441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer H, Campbell KL, East ML, Huish SA (2000) Modeling the spatial distribution of the economic costs and benefits of illegal game meat hunting in the Serengeti. Nat Resour Model 13(1):151–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homewood K, Bluwstein J, Lund JF, Keane A, Nielsen M R, Msuha M, Burgess N (2015) The economic and social viability of Tanzanian Wildlife Management Areas. Policy Briefs No.04/2015, Centre for Development Research, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen

  • International Association for Public Participation (IAPP) (2014) Public Participation Spectrum. http://www.IAP2.org.au/documents/item/84. Accessed 24 April 2014

  • Kaaya E. (2014) Evaluation of Community Based Wildlife Management on Conservation of Wildlife in Tanzania. A Case Study of Serengeti National Park. Dissertation, University of Queensland

  • Kaltenborn BP, Nyahongo JW, Kidegesho JR, Haaland H (2008) Serengeti national park and its neighbours—Do they interact? J Nat Conserv 16(2):96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenborn BP, Nyahongo JW, Tingstad KM (2005) The nature of hunting around the Western Corridor of Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Eur J Wildl Res 51(4):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanapaux W, Child B (2011) Livelihood activities in a Namibian wildlife conservancy: a case study of variation within a CBNRM programme. Oryx 45(3):365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kideghesho JR (2008) Who compensates for widlife conservation in Serengeti? Int J Biodivers Sci Manage 4:112–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kideghesho J (2016) Reversing the trend of wildlife crime in Tanzania: challenges and opportunities. Biodivers Conserv 25:427–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisamo ES (2002) The impacts of community conservation initiatives in Tanzania: a case study of villages around Udzungwa Mountains National Park. Dissertation, University of Cape Town

  • Knapp E (2012) Why poaching pays: a summary of risks and benefits illegal hunters face in Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Trop Conserv Sci 5(4):434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp E, Rentsch D, Schmitt J, Lewis C, Polasky S (2010) A tale of three villages: choosing an effective method for assessing poaching levels in western Serengeti, Tanzania. Oryx 44(2):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang V (2014) Banking on Savings: understanding the role of community-based microfinance in conservation of the North Luangwa ecosystem. Dissertation, Imperial College, London

  • Lepper CM, Goebel JS (2010) Community-based natural resource management, poverty alleviation and livelihood diversification: a case study from northern Botswana. Dev South Afr 27(5):725–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey PA et al. (2013) The bushmeat trade in African savannas: impacts, drivers, and possible solutions. Biol Conserv 160(4):80–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loibooki M, Hofer H, Campbell KLI, East ML (2002) Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income. Environ Conserv 29(3):391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie CA (2012) Trenches like fences make good neighbours: revenue sharing around Kibale National Park, Uganda. J Nat Conserv 20(2):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger KL, Sinclair ARE, Hilborn R, Grant J, Hopcraft C, Mduma SR (2010) Evaluating the protection of wildlife in parks: the case of African buffalo in Serengeti. Biodivers Conserv 19:3431–3444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro M, Fischer A, Czajkowski M, Brennan D, Lowassa A, Naiman LC, Hanley N (2013) An investigation using the choice experiment method into options for reducing illegal bushmeat hunting in western Serengeti. Conserv Lett 6(1):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulonga S, Murphy CA (2003) Spending the money: the experience of conservancy benefit distribution in Namibia up to mid-2003, DEA Discussion Research Paper No. 63 October, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia, Windhoek

  • Murphree MW (2002) Protected areas and the commons. Common Prop Resour Dig 60:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Musumali MM, Larsen TS, Kaltenborn BP (2007) An impasse in community-based natural resource management implementation: the case of Zambia and Botswana. Oryx 41(3):306–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwakaje AG, Manyasa E, Wawire N, Muchai M, Ongare D, Mugoya C, Masiga CW, Nikundiwe A (2013) Community-based conservation, income governance, and poverty alleviation in Tanzania: the case of serengeti ecosystem. J Environ Dev 22(1):51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson F, Agrawal A (2008) Patronage or participation? Community‐based natural resource management reform in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Dev Change 39(4):557–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark WD, Hough JL (2000) Conserving wildlife in Africa: integrated conservation and development projects and beyond. Bioscience 50(7):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuno A, Bunnefeld N, Milner-Gulland E (2014) Managing social–ecological systems under uncertainty: implementation in the real world. Ecol Soc 19(2):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribot J, Agrawal A, Larson AM (2006) Recentralizing while Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest Resources. World Dev 34(11):1864–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riehl B, Zerriffi H, Naidoo R (2015) Effects of community-based natural resource management on household welfare in Namibia. PLoS One 10(5):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141(10):2417–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch D, Damon A (2013) Prices, poaching, and protein alternatives: an analysis of bushmeat consumption around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Ecol Econ 91:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L, Makupa E (2015) Using analysis of governance to unpack community-based conservation: a case study from Tanzania. Environ Manage 56:1214–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross H, Buchy M, Proctor W (2002) Laying down the ladder: a typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management. Australas J Environ 9(4):205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt JA (2010) Improving conservation efforts in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania: an examination of knowledge, benefits, costs, and attitudes. Dissertation, University of Minnesota

  • Simasiku P, Simwanza HI, Tembo G, Bandyopandhyay S, Pavy J-M (2008) The impact of wildlife management policies on communities and conservation in game management areas in Zambia: message to policy makers. Natural Resources Consultative Forum, Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources, Lusaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Songorwa AN (1999) Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: are the communities interested? World Dev 27(12):2061–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suich H (2013) The effectiveness of economic incentives for sustaining community based natural resource management. Land Use Policy 31:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulle E (2012) The role of microcredit insitutions in poverty reduction and on dependence on natural resources. a case study of COCOBA in Serengeti District. Dissertation, University of Maryland

  • Sungusia E (2010) Community based conservation in Tanzania, getting the incentives right. Tropical Resources: Bulletin of the Yale Tropical Resources Institute 29:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA) (2013a) Ten years poaching report 2014, Serengeti Anti-poaching Department. TANAPA, Arusha

  • Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA) (2013b) Community Conservation Services history. Serengeti National Park, SCIP projects reports. TANAPA, Arusha

  • Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA) (2008) Corporate plan, Community Conservation Services 2008/2009 to 2012/2013, TANAPA, Arusha http://www.tanzaniaparks.com/corporate_information.html. Accessed 20 May 2014

  • United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (1998) The wildlife policy of Tanzania. Government of Tanzania Government Printer, Dar es Salaam. http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/wildlifepolicy.pdf Accessed 10 Nov 2013

  • USAID (2013) Tanzania wildlife management areas evaluation. Final evaluation report. United States Agency of International Development, United States Government, Washington, D.C

  • Wells M (1992) Biodiversity conservation, affluence and poverty—mismatched costs and benefits and efforts to remedy them. Ambio 21(3):237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild R, Milliga A, Robinson J (2008) Microfinance and environmental sustainability at selected sites in Tanzania and Kenya. Summary Report. WWF, CARE, and LTS International, UK

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank D. Lamb, D. Rentsch, H. Ross and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Chapman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaaya, E., Chapman, M. Micro-Credit and Community Wildlife Management: Complementary Strategies to Improve Conservation Outcomes in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Environmental Management 60, 464–475 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0856-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0856-x

Keywords

Navigation