Abstract
Harvesting and trading non-timber forest products is advocated as a win-win strategy for conservation and development, yet it can produce negative ecological and socioeconomic impacts. Hence, monitoring exploitation outcomes is essential, and participatory monitoring has been suggested to be the most suitable approach. Among possible approaches, participatory monitoring is preferred because it is likely to increase people’s awareness and beliefs regarding impacts or potential impacts, thus inducing behavioral changes, although the evidence in this regard is contradictory. We therefore evaluated whether people’s beliefs about the potential ecological and socioeconomic impacts of non-timber forest product exploitation increased their likelihood of volunteering to monitor. We studied a community of forest inhabitants in the Brazilian Amazon who harvested and traded a commercially important non-timber forest product. Two methods of data gathering were employed: (i) a survey of 166 adults (51 households) to evaluate people’s beliefs and their stated intention to engage in four different monitoring tasks and (ii) four pilot monitoring tasks to evaluate who actually participated. Based on mixed-effects regressions, the results indicated that beliefs regarding both types of impacts could predict participation in certain tasks, although gender, age and schooling were occasionally stronger predictors. On average, people had stronger beliefs about potential socioeconomic impacts than about potential ecological impacts, with the former also predicting participation in ecological data gathering. This finding reinforces the importance of monitoring both types of impacts to help achieve the win-win outcomes originally proposed by non-timber forest product trade initiatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abecasis RC, Longnecker N, Schmidt L, Clifton J (2013) Marine conservation in remote small island settings: factors influencing marine protected area establishment in the Azores. Mar Policy 40:1–9
Adams AM, Evans TG, Mohammed R, Farnsworth J (1997) Socioeconomic stratification by wealth rainking: is it valid? World Dev 25:1165–1172
Ajzen I, Joyce N, Sheikh S, Cote NG (2011) Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: the role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic Appl Soc Psych 33:101–117
Allegretti MHA (2008) Construção social de políticas ambientais. Chico Mendes e o movimento dos seringueiros. DeMA 18:39–59
Arnold J, Ruiz-Pérez M (2001) Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives? Ecol Econ 39:437–447
Aswani S, Gurney GG, Mulville S, Matera J, Gurven M (2013) Insights from experimental economics on local cooperation in a small-scale fishery management system. Global Environ Change 23:1402–1409
Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25
Beirne C, Lambin X (2013) Understanding the determinants of volunteer retention through capture-recapture analysis: answering social science questions using a wildlife ecology toolkit. Conserv Lett 6:391–401
Bruyere B, Rappe S (2007) Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. J Environ Planning Manage 50:503–516
Cavalcanti C, Engel S, Leibbrandt A (2013) Social integration, participation, and community resource management. J Environ Econ Manage 65:262–276
Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD, Copeland J, Stukas A, Haugen J, Miene P (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. JPSP 74:1516
Danielsen F, Burgess N, Balmford A (2005) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodivers Conserv 14:2507–2542
Dietz T, Stern PC (2002) New tools for environmental protection: education, information, and voluntary measures. National Academy Press, Washington DC
Emanuel P, Shackleton CM, Baxter JS (2005) Modelling the sustainable harvest of Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra fruits in the South African lowveld. For Ecol Manage 214:91–103
Evans K, Guariguata M (2008) Participatory monitoring in tropical forest management: a review of tools, concepts and lessons learned. CIFOR, Bogor
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ (2006) An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol 25:462–473
Fisher RJ, Dechaineux R (1998) A methodology for assessing and evaluating the social impacts of non-timber forest product projects. In: Wollenberg EI (Ed.) Incomes from the forest: methods for the development and conservation of forest products for local communities. CIFOR, Bogor, p 189–199
Friedrich LA, Jefferson R, Glegg G (2014) Public perceptions of sharks: gathering support for shark conservation. Mar Policy 47:1–7
Fröde A, Masara C (2007) Community-based ecological monitoring manual for practitioners. Safire - Southern alliance for indigenous resources, Harare
Geoghegan H., Dyke A., Pateman R., West S., Everett G. (2016) Understanding Motivations for Citizen Science. Final Report on Behalf of UKEOF, University of Reading, Stockholm Environment Institute (University of York) and University of the West of England
Gichuki NN, Macharia JM (2003) Participation of local communities in the management of wetlands in Magadi area, Kenya. In: Lemons J, Victor R, Schaffer D (Eds.) Conserving biodiversity in arid regions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, p 87–103
Girard N, Magda D, Astruc JM, Couix N, Gross H, Guyon JP, Labatut J, Poinsot Y, Saldaqui F (2015) Analyzing indicators for combining natural resources management and production-oriented activities. Environ Dev Sustain 17:155–172
Goldstein H (2011) Multilevel statistical models, 4th edn.. Wiley, Chichester
Grandin BE (1988) Wealth ranking in smallholder communities: a field manual. Intermediate Technology Group, Rugby
Grasmick HG, Bursik RJ, Kinsey KA (1991) Shame and embarrassment as deterrents to noncompliance with the law: the case of an antilittering campaign. Environ Behav 23:233–251
Gurven M, Kaplan H, Gutierrez M (2006) How long does it take to become a proficient hunter? Implications for the evolution of extended development and long life span. J Hum Evol 51:454–470
Hamilton L (2012) Statistics with STATA: version 12. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA
Holck MH (2008) Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost–effective methods. Biodivers Conserv 17:2023–2036
Holte-McKenzie M, Forde S, Theobald S (2006) Development of a participatory monitoring and evaluation strategy. Eval Program Plann 29:365–376
ICMBio (2011) Plano de manejo da Reserva Extrativista do Médio Juruá, Carauari, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Illukpitiya P, Yanagida JF (2010) Farming vs forests: trade-off between agriculture and the extraction of non-timber forest products. Ecol Econ 69:1952–1963
Jensen BB (2002) Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environ Educ Res 8:325–334
Johnson MF, Hannah C, Acton L, Popovici R, Karanth KK, Weinthal E (2014) Network environmentalism: citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy. Global Environ Change 29:235–245
Klimas C, Kainer K, Wadt LHO (2007) Population structure of Carapa guianensis in two forest types in the southwestern Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manage 250:256–265
Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260
Kusters K, Achdiawan R, Belcher B, Ruiz P,M (2006) Balancing development and conservation? An assessment of livelihood and environmental outcomes of nontimber forest products in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Ecol Soc 11:art. 20
Land-Zandstra AM, Devilee JLA, Snik F, Buurmeijer F, Broek JMvd (2016) Citizen science on a smartphone: participants’ motivations and learning. Public Underst Sci 25:45–60
Larson P, Svendsen DS (1996) Participatory monitoring and evaluation: a practical guide to successful ICDPS World Wildlife Fund. Washington DC, World Wildlife Fund
Lewandowski E, Specht H (2015) Influence of volunteer and project characteristics on data quality of biological surveys. Conserv Biol 29:713–723
Liu XS, Vedlitz A, Shi L (2014) Examining the determinants of public environmental concern: evidence from national public surveys. Environ Sci Policy 39:77–94
Machado FS (2008) Manejo de produtos florestais não madeireiros: um manual com sugestões para o manejo participativo em comunidades da Amazônia. PESACRE, CIFOR, Rio Branco
Measham TG, Barnett GB (2008) Environmental volunteering: motivations, modes and outcomes. Aust Geogr 39:537–552
Morsello C, Adger WN (2007) Do Partnerships between large corporations and Amazonian Indigenous groups help or hinder communities and forests? In: Ros-Tonen MAF, Zoomers A, van den Hombergh H (Eds.) Partnerships in Sustainable Forest Resource Management: Learning from Latin America. Brill, Leiden, p 147–167
Morsello C, Delgado JAS, Fonseca-Morello T, Brites AD (2014) Does trading non-timber forest products drive specialisation in products gathered for consumption? Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Econ 100:140–149
Murphy R, Steward J (1956) Tappers and trappers: parallel processes in acculturation. Econ Devel Cult Change 4:335–353
Neuman R, Hirsch E (2000) Commercialization of non-timber forest products: a review and analysis of research. CIFOR, Bogor
Nugent S (1993) Amazonian caboclo society: an essay on invisibility and peasant economy. Oxford, Berg
Oldekop JA, Truelove NK, Villamarin S, Preziosi RF (2012) Information flows in community-based monitoring exercises in the ecuadorian amazon. Int J Zool 2012:4
Pollnac RB, Crawford BR, Gorospe MLG (2001) Discovering factors that influence the success of community based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines. Ocean Coast Manage 44:683–710
Rajecki DW (1982) Attitudes, themes and advances. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Randall A (2002) The policy context for flexible, negotiated, and voluntary measures. In: Dietz T, Stern PC (Eds.) New tools for environmental protection: education, information, and voluntary measures. National Academy Press, Washington DC, p 311–318
Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431
Reed MS, Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ (2006) An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecol Econ 59:406–418
Rizek MB, Morsello C (2012) Impacts of trade in non-timber forest products on cooperation among caboclo households of the Brazilian Amazon. Hum Ecol 40:707–719
Roggenbuck JW, Haas SC, Hall TE, Hull RB (2000) Motivation, Retention, and Program Recommendations of Save Our Stream Volunteers. Final Report submitted to Virginia Water Resources Research Center, Blacksburg, VA: Department of Forestry, Virginia Tech
Ryan RL, Kaplan R, Grese RE (2001) Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. J Environ Plan Manage 44:629–648
Setty R, Bawa K, Ticktin T, Gowda CM (2008) Evaluation of a participatory resource monitoring system for nontimber forest products: the case of Amla (Phyllanthus spp.) fruit harvest by Soligas in South India. Ecol Soc 13:art.19
Shackleton C, Shackleton S, Shanley P (2011) Building a holistic picture: an integrative analysis of current and future prospects for non-timber forest products in a changing world. In: Shackleton S, Shackleton C, Shanley P (Eds.) Non-timber forest products in the global context. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, p 255–280
Shanley P, Laird S, Pierce A, Guillen A (2002) Introduction. In: Shanley P, Pierce A, Laird S, Guillén A (Eds.) Tapping the green market. Earthscan, London, p 1–6
Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471
Stem C, Margoluis R, Salafsky N, Brown M (2005) Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: a review of trends and approaches. Conserv Biol 19:295–309
Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424
Ticktin T (2004) The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. J Appl Ecol 41:11–21
Ticktin T, Shackleton C (2011) Harvesting non-timber forest products sustainability: opportunities and challenges. In: Shackleton S, Shackleton C, Shanley P (Eds.) Non-timber forest products in the global context. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, p 149–169
Tulloch AIT, Possingham HP, Joseph LN, Szabo J, Martin TG (2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biol Conserv 165:128–138
Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, Ciarocco NJ, Bartels JM (2007) Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. JPSP 92:56–66
Uberhuaga P, Smith-Hall C, Helles F (2012) Forest income and dependency in lowland Bolivia. Environ Dev Sustain 14:3–23
Winter S, Prozesky H, Esler K (2007) A Case study of landholder attitudes and behaviour toward the conservation of Renosterveld, a critically endangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom, South Africa. Environ Manage 40:46–61
Zenteno M, Zuidema PA, de Jong W, Boot RGA (2013) Livelihood strategies and forest dependence: new insights from Bolivian forest communities. Forest Policy Econ 26:12–21
Zuur A, Leno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dantas Brites, A., Morsello, C. Beliefs about the Potential Impacts of Exploiting Non-Timber Forest Products Predict Voluntary Participation in Monitoring. Environmental Management 59, 898–911 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0845-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0845-0