Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Surface Flow Constructed Wetlands (SFCW) for Nutrient Reduction in Drainage Discharge from Agricultural Fields in Denmark

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructed wetlands have been proposed as cost-effective and more targeted technologies in the reduction of nitrogen and phosphorous water pollution in drainage losses from agricultural fields in Denmark. Using two pig farms and one dairy farm situated in a pumped lowland catchment as case studies, this paper explores the feasibility of implementing surface flow constructed wetlands (SFCW) based on their cost effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis is conducted by varying the cost elements of the wetlands in order to establish the most cost-effective scenario and a comparison with the existing nutrients reduction measures carried out. The analyses show that the cost effectiveness of the SFCW is higher in the drainage catchments with higher nutrient loads. The range of the cost effectiveness ratio on nitrogen reduction differs distinctively with that of catch crop measure. The study concludes that SFCW could be a better optimal nutrients reduction measure in drainage catchments characterized with higher nutrient loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Non-point source pollution enters water diffusely in the run-off or leachate from rain or melting snow and is often a function of land use (Ribaudo et al. 1999).

  2. Marginal abatement cost (MAC) is the cost of reducing or avoiding emission of an additional unit of pollutant.

  3. This cost is calculated using an hourly consultant fee of €47 with two supervisory visits per month (Thing, A. B. personal communication, April 15, 2014).

References

  • Balana BB, Vinten A, Slee B (2011) A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: key issues, methods, and applications. Ecol Econ 70:1021–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BalticDeal (2012) http://www.balticdeal.eu/measure/catch-crops/. Accesses June 2014

  • Bidstrup J, Broch K, Kristensen PN (2007) Implementation of the water framework directive in the limfjorden- how to reach good ecological status. Danish Ministry of the Environment Environment Centre Aalborg, Denmark

  • Byström O (1998) The nitrogen abatement cost in wetlands. Ecol Econ 26:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland TE, Weston JF, Shastri K, Education P (1983) Financial theory and corporate policy. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Ministry of Environment (2009) Agreement for Green Growth (Environmental Protection Agency), Denmark

  • Dunne E, Culleton N, O’Donovan G, Harrington R, Olsen A (2005) An integrated constructed wetland to treat contaminants and nutrients from dairy farmyard dirty water. Ecol Eng 24:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elofsson K (2010) The costs of meeting the environmental objectives for the Baltic Sea: a review of the literature. Ambio 39(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouriveau F (2009) Constructed farm wetlands (CFWs) designed for remediation of farmyard runoff: an evaluation of their water treatment efficiency, ecological value, costs and benefits

  • Greve MH, Breuning-Madsen H (1998) Soil mapping in Denmark. European Soil Bureau Research Report

  • Gustafson A, Fleischer S, Joelsson A (2000) A catchment-oriented and cost-effective policy for water protection. Ecol Eng 14:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holst KA, Breuning-Madsen H (1986) The elaboration of drainage class maps for agricultural planning in Denmark. Landsc Urban Plan 13:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen BH (2007) In search of cost-effective measures: Danish report on the use of cost-effectiveness analysis when implementing the EU water framework directive. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen

  • Jacobsen BH, Gachango FG (2013) Vurdering af omkostningseffektiviteten ved minivådområder med infiltrationsmatrice. Institut for Fødevare- og Ressourceøkonomi, Københavns Universitet, Frederiksberg

  • Jensen CL, Jacobsen BH, Olsen SB, Dubgaard A, Hasler B (2013) A practical CBA-based screening procedure for identification of river basins where the costs of fulfilling the WFD requirements may be disproportionate–applied to the case of Denmark. J Environ Econ Policy 2:164–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Knight RL, Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper P, Haberl R (2000) Constructed wetlands for pollution control. International Water Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergaard C, Hoffmann CC (2010) Konstruerede vådområder som effektive landskabsfiltre. Vand og Jord 17:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergaard C, Iversen BV (2014) Konstruerede minivådområder med overfladestrømning målrettet drænvand. pp. 14. Aarhus Universitet. (Unpublished work—In Danish)

  • Kjaergaard C, Hoffmann C, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Jensen P (2006) Konstruerede vådområder. Miljøforvaltning i risikoområder

  • Kjaergaard C, Rubæk G, Heckrath G (2010) Mitigation of phosphorus losses from agriculture.Knowledge, knowledge gaps, mitigation strategies and future research—the Danish story. Sustainable Phosphorous summit, Sweden

  • Knudsen L, Lemming C (2012) Environmental measures in Denmark. In Plant Production. Knowledge Centre for Agriculture, Denmark

  • Kovacic DA, Twait RM, Wallace MP, Bowling JM (2006) Use of created wetlands to improve water quality in the Midwest—Lake Bloomington case study. Ecol Eng 28:258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Atkinson G, Mourato S (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. Organisation for Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris

  • Pindyck RS (2005) Sunk costs and real options in antitrust (No. w11430). National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Refsgaard A, Jacobsen T, Jacobsen B, Orum J (2007) Integrated modelling of nitrate loads to coastal waters and land rent applied to catchment-scale water management. Water Sci Technol 56:39–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo MO, Horan RD, Smith ME (1999) Economics of water quality protection from non-point sources: theory and practice. AER-782, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

  • Scholz M, Lee BH (2005) Constructed wetlands: a review. Int J Environ Stud 62:421–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M, Sadowski AJ, Harrington R, Carroll P (2007) Integrated Constructed Wetlands assessment and design for phosphate removal. Biosyst Eng 97:415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoumans OF, Chardon WJ, Bechmann ME, Gascuel-Odoux C, Hofman G, Kronvang B, Rubæk GH, Ulén B, Dorioz JM (2014) Mitigation options to reduce phosphorus losses from the agricultural sector and improve surface water quality: a review. Sci Total Environ 468–469:1255–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Gordon R, Madani A, Stratton G (2006) Year-round treatment of dairy wastewater by constructed wetlands in Atlantic Canada. Wetlands 26:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Denmark (2014). http://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/landbrug-gartneri-og-skovbrug.aspx. Accessed 15 Sept 2014

  • Tanner CC, Nguyen ML, Sukias JPS (2005) Nutrient removal by a constructed wetland treating subsurface drainage from grazed dairy pasture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:145–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Van Den Bergh JC, Söderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Maltby E, van Ierland EC (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35:7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyndall JC, Schulte LA, Liebman M, Helmers M (2013) Field-level financial assessment of contour prairie strips for enhancement of environmental quality. Environ Manag 52:736–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water 2:530–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woltemade C (2000) Ability of restored wetlands to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in agricultural drainage water. J Soil Water Conserv 55:303–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JD, Gordon R, Madani A, Stratton GW (2008) A long term assessment of phosphorus treatment by a constructed wetland receiving dairy wastewater. Wetlands 28:715–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhi W, Ji G (2012) Constructed wetlands, 1991–2011: a review of research development, current trends, and future directions. Sci Total Environ 441:19–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council, Grant no. 09-067280 (Sustainable Phosphorous Remediation Technologies, www.supremetech.dk). The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Danish Strategic Research Council and the provision of cost and farm data by the three farm owners.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. G. Gachango.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gachango, F.G., Pedersen, S.M. & Kjaergaard, C. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Surface Flow Constructed Wetlands (SFCW) for Nutrient Reduction in Drainage Discharge from Agricultural Fields in Denmark. Environmental Management 56, 1478–1486 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0585-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0585-y

Keywords

Navigation