Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Management Strategy: Four Forces Analysis

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop an analytical approach for more systematically analyzing environmental management problems in order to develop strategic plans. This approach can be deployed by agencies, non-profit organizations, corporations, or other organizations and institutions tasked with improving environmental quality. The analysis relies on assessing the underlying natural processes followed by articulation of the relevant societal forces causing environmental change: (1) science and technology, (2) governance, (3) markets and the economy, and (4) public behavior. The four forces analysis is then used to strategize which types of actions might be most effective at influencing environmental quality. Such strategy has been under-used and under-valued in environmental management outside of the corporate sector, and we suggest that this four forces analysis is a useful analytic to begin developing such strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews R (1999) Managing the environment, managing ourselves. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S (2005) Synthesizing U.S. stream restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie R (1999) Endangered species mitigation banking: promoting recovery through habitat conservation planning under the Endangered Species Act. Sci Total Environ 240:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd KB, Kreitler JR, Labiosa WB (2011) Tools and Methods for Evaluating and Refining Alternative Futures for Coastal Ecosystem Management—the Puget Sound Ecosystem Portfolio Model. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1279, 47 p

  • Clark JS, Carpenter SR, Barber M, Collins S, Dobson A, Foley JA, Lodge DM, Pascual M, Pielke R, Pizer W, Pringle C, Reid WV, Rose KA, Sala O, Schlessinger WH, Wall DH, Wear D (2001) Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science 293:657–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colman BP, Espinasse B, Richardson CJ, Matson CW, Lowry GV, Hunt DE, Wiesner MR, Bernhardt E (2014) Emerging contaminant or old toxin in disguise? Silver nanoparticle impacts on ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 48:5229–5236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. J Econ Persp 16:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declercq B, Delarue E, D’haeleleer W (2011) Impact of the economic recession on the European power sector’s CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 39:1677–1686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deibel TL (2007) Foreign affairs strategy: logic for American statecraft. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle MW, Shields FD (2012) Compensatory mitigation for streams under the U.S. Clean Water Act: reassessing science and redirecting policy. J Am Water Resour Assoc 48:294–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty DC, Simmons PJ (2011) The green to gold business playbook. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman F (2003) Practical guide to environmental management. Environmental Law Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeuber RA, Michener WK (1998) Policy implications of recent natural and managed floods. Bioscience 48:765–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney MA, Wilcock PR, Hobbs BF, Flores NE, Martinez DC (2012) Is urban stream restoration worth it? J Am Water Resour Assoc 48:603–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1939) Academic and professional training in wildlife work. J Wildl Manag 3:156–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Leurig S (2012) Water Ripples: Expanding Risks for U.S. Water Providers. Ceres, Washington

  • Limburg KE, Waldman JR (2009) Dramatic declines in North Atlantic diadromous fishes. Bioscience 59:955–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg TT, Bernhardt ES, Bier R, Helton AM, Merola RB, Vengosh A, DiGiulio RT (2011) Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:20929–20934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz B, Lewis BA, Doyle MW (2013) Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus shale gas development. Water Resour Res 49:647–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Notter DA, Gauch M, Widmer R, Wager P, Stamp A, Zah R, Althaus HJ (2010) Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 44:6550–6556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden JC (2005) Everglades ridge and slough conceptual ecological model. Wetlands 25:810–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden JC, Davis SM, Jacobs KJ, Barnes T, Fling HE (2005) The use of conceptual ecological models to guide ecosystem restoration in South Florida. Wetlands 25:795–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1979) How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, March/April, pp 137–145

  • Porter ME (2008) The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy, Harvard Business Review, January, pp 86–104

  • Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Scavia D (2002) Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi River. Bioscience 52:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savory A, Butterfield J (1999) Holistic management: a new framework for decision-making. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2001) Enriching the earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Lord JW, Zhou L, Xiao J (2008) Empirical evidence for impacts of internal migration on vegetation dynamics in China from 1982 to 2000. Sensors 8:5069–5080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson K, Shabman L (2011) Rhetoric and reality of water quality trading and the potential for market-like reform. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ et al (2014) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2014. Trends Ecol Evol 29:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson D (2002) Tools for Environmental Management. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Romme WH, Tinker DB (2003) Surprises and lessons from the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Front Ecol Environ 1:351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper has been adapted and improved through discussions with many students in the Masters of Environmental Management Program at Duke University. Meg Perry and Chuck Podolak provided detailed reviews of an earlier version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA

    Martin W. Doyle & Jesko Von Windheim

Authors
  1. Martin W. Doyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesko Von Windheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin W. Doyle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doyle, M.W., Von Windheim, J. Environmental Management Strategy: Four Forces Analysis. Environmental Management 55, 6–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0389-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0389-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation