Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climate Change and Land Management in the Rangelands of Central Oregon

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change, along with exotic species, disturbances, and land use change, will likely have major impacts on sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the western U.S. over the next century. To effectively manage sagebrush steppe landscapes for long-term goals, managers need information about the interacting impacts of climate change, disturbances and land management on vegetation condition. Using a climate-informed state-and-transition model, we evaluated the potential impacts of climate change on rangeland condition in central Oregon and the effectiveness of multiple management strategies. Under three scenarios of climate change, we projected widespread shifts in potential vegetation types over the twenty-first century, with declining sagebrush steppe and expanding salt desert shrub likely by the end of the century. Many extreme fire years occurred under all climate change scenarios, triggering rapid vegetation shifts. Increasing wildfire under climate change resulted in expansion of exotic grasses but also decreased juniper encroachment relative to projections without climate change. Restoration treatments in warm–dry sagebrush steppe were ineffective in containing exotic grass, but juniper treatments in cool–moist sagebrush steppe substantially reduced the rate of juniper encroachment, particularly when prioritized early in the century. Overall, climate-related shifts dominated future vegetation patterns, making management for improved rangeland condition more difficult. Our approach allows researchers and managers to examine long-term trends and uncertainty in rangeland vegetation condition and test the effectiveness of alternative management actions under projected climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abatzoglou JT, Kolden CA (2011) Climate change in western US deserts: potential for increased wildfire and invasive annual grasses. Rangeland Ecol Manag 64:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelet D, Lenihan JM, Daly C, Neilson RP, Ojima DS, Parton WJ (2001) MC1: a dynamic vegetation model for estimating the distribution of vegetation and associated carbon, nutrients, and water—technical documentation. Version 1.0. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-508. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR

  • Balch JK, Bradley BA, D’Antonio CM, Gomez-Dans J (2012) Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980–2009). Global Change Biol 19:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JD, Miller RF, Svejcar T (2005) Long-term successional trends following Western juniper cutting. Range Ecol Manage 58:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beschta RL, Donahue DL, Dellasala DA, Rhodes JJ, Karr JR, O’Brien MH, Fleischner TL, Williams CD (2012) Adapting to climate change on western public lands: addressing the ecological effects of domestic, wild, and feral ungulates. Environ Manage 51:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestelmeyer BT, Brown JR, Havstad KM, Alexander R, Chavez G, Herrick J (2003) Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. J Range Manage 56:114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers JL (2004) Postfire seeding for erosion control: effectiveness and impacts on native plant communities. Conserv Biol 18:947–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA (2010) Assessing ecosystem threats from global and regional change: hierarchical modeling of risk to sagebrush ecosystems from climate change, land use and invasive species in Nevada, USA. Ecography 33:198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA, Wilcove DS (2009) When invasive plants disappear: transformative restoration possibilities in the western United States resulting from climate change. Restor Ecol 17:715–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA, Oppenheimer M, Wilcove DS (2009) Climate change and plant invasions: restoration opportunities ahead? Global Change Biol 15:1511–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks ML, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley JE, DiTomasco JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D (2004) Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting SC, Kingery JL, Strand E (1999) Effects of succession on species richness of the western juniper woodland/sagebrush steppe mosaic. In: Monsen SB, Richards S, Tausch RJ, Miller RF, Goodrich S (eds) Proceedings: ecology and management of pinyon–juniper communities within the interior West. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station-P-9, Ogden, UT, pp 76–81

  • Burkhardt JW, Tisdale EW (1976) Causes of juniper invasion in southwestern Idaho. Ecology 57:472–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC, Pellant M (2008) Climate change impacts on northwestern and intermountain United States rangelands. Rangelands 30:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crookston NL, Finley AO (2008) yaImpute: an R package for kNN imputation. J Stat Soft 23:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel CJ, Frid L (2012) Predicting landscape vegetation dynamics using state-and-transition simulation models. In: Kerns BK, Shlisky A, Daniel CJ (eds) Proceedings of the first landscape state-and-transition simulation modeling conference, June 14–16, 2011, Portland, OR. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-869. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR, pp 5–22

  • Davies KW, Sheley RL (2011) Promoting native vegetation and diversity in exotic annual grass infestations. Restor Ecol 19:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers L (2010) Modeling sage-grouse habitat using a state-and-transition model. Thesis, Oregon State University

  • Evers LB, Miller RF, Doescher PS, Hemstrom M, Neilson RP (2013) Simulating current successional trajectories in sagebrush ecosystems with multiple disturbances using a state-and-transition modeling framework. Rangeland Ecol Manage 66:313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbis TA, Provencher L, Frid L, Medlyn G (2006) Great basin land management planning using ecological modeling. Environ Manage 38:62–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friggens MM, Warwell MV, Chambers JC, Kitchen SG (2012) Modeling and predicting vegetation response of western USA grasslands, shrublands, and deserts to climate change. In: Finch DM (ed) Climate change in grasslands, shrublands, and deserts of the interior American West: a review and needs assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-285. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO

  • Gibson JR (2011) Individualistic response of Piñon and Juniper tree species distributions to climate change in North America’s arid interior west. Thesis, Utah State University

  • Halofsky JE, Hemstrom MA, Conklin DR, Halofsky JS, Kerns BK, Bachelet D (2013) Assessing potential climate change effects on vegetation using a linked model approach. Ecol Model 266:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemstrom MA, Merzenich J, Reger A, Wales BC (2007) Integrated analysis of landscape management scenarios using state and transition models in the upper Grande Ronde River subbasin, Oregon, USA. Landscape Urban Plan 80:198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B (1991) How plants respond to climate change—migration rates, individualism and the consequences for plant-communities. Ann Bot (Lond) 67:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group II (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp PA (1996) Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L) dominance in the Great Basin desert. Global Environ Change 6:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knick ST, Connelly JW (eds) (2011) Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer RG, Hunt ER, Running SW, Coughlan JC (1996) Simulating vegetational and hydrologic responses to natural climatic variation and GCM-predicted climate change in a semi-arid ecosystem in Washington, USA. J Arid Environ 33:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenihan JM, Daly C, Bachelet D, Neilson RP (1998) Simulating broad-scale fire severity in a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Northwest Sci 72:91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell JS, Oneil EE, McKenzie D, Hicke JA, Lutz JA, Norheim RA, Elsner MM (2010) Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington State, USA. Clim Change 102:129–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mote P (2004) Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation. Conserv Biol 18:890–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Rose JA (1995) Historic expansion of Juniperus occidentalis (western juniper) in southeastern Oregon. Great Basin Nat 55:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Svejcar TJ, Rose JA (2000) Impacts of western juniper on plant community composition and structure. J Range Manage 53:574–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Bates JD, Svejcar TJ, Pierson FB, Eddleman LE (2005) Biology, ecology, and management of western juniper. Tech Bull 152. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station

  • Mote P, Snover AK, Capalbo S, Eigenbrode SD, Glick P, Littell J, Raymondi R, Reeder S (2014) Ch. 21: Northwest. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program

  • Neilson RP (1995) A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecol Appl 5:352–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson RP, Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Drapek RJ (2005) Climate change implications for sagebrush ecosytems. Transactions of the 70th North American wildlife and natural resources conference, vol 70, pp 145–159

  • Parton WJ, Scurlock JMO, Ojima DS, Gilmanov TG, Scholes RJ, Schimel DS, Kirchner T, Menaut JC, Seastedt T, Moya EG, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario JI (1993) Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic-matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochem Cy 7:785–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson FB, Bates JD, Svejcar TJ, Hardegree SP (2007) Runoff and erosion after cutting western juniper. Range Ecol Manage 60:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke DA, Wirth TA, Beyers JL (2013) Does seeding after wildfires in rangelands reduce erosion or invasive species? Restor Ecol 21:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers BM, Neilson RP, Drapek R, Lenihan JM, SWells JR, Bachelet D, Law BE (2011) Impacts of climate change on fire regimes and carbon stocks of the U.S. Pacific Northwest. J Geophys Res 116:G03037

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer DR, Lauenroth WK, Bradford JB (2012) Effects of ecohydrological variables on current and future ranges, local suitability patterns, and model accuracy in big sagebrush. Ecography 35:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SD, Huxman TE, Zitzer SF, Charlet TN, Housman DC, Coleman JS, Fenstermaker LK, Seemann JR, Nowak RS (2000) Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408:79–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Interior (2010) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month findings for petitions to list the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as threatened or endangered. Fed Reg 75:13910–14014

    Google Scholar 

  • Vose JM, Peterson DL, Patel-Weynand T (2012) Effects of climatic variability and change on forest ecosystems: a comprehensive science synthesis for the U.S. forest sector. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-870. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR

  • Walker BL, Naugle DE, Doherty KE (2007) Greater sage-grouse population response to energy development and habitat loss. J Wildl Manage 71:2644–2654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Walker B, Noy-Mier I (1989) Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manage 42:66–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant SG (1990) Changing fire frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: ecological and management implications. In: McArthur ED, Romney EM, Smith SD, Tueller PT (eds) Proceedings: symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management. Gen Tech Rep INT-276. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 4–10

  • Ziska LH, Reeves JB, Blank B (2005) The impact of recent increases in atmospheric CO2 on biomass production and vegetative retention of Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum): implications for fire disturbance. Global Change Biol 11:1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was part of the Integrated Landscape Assessment Project, funded by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Many thanks to Louisa Evers, Dave Swanson, and the Nature Conservancy chapters of Idaho and Nevada for developing and sharing the STMs. Jimmy Kagan, Miles Hemstrom, Louisa Evers, Paul Doescher, and Rick Miller provided valuable feedback on STM assumptions, parameterization, and output. Dominique Bachelet and David Conklin ran the MC1 model and assisted in developing the MC1-STM linkage process. Emilie Henderson developed the current vegetation map, and Michael Polly conducted the spatial analysis of the MTBS fire data. Rich Gwozdz programmed the integration of GIS data sets with the Path model, and Joe Bernert, Jennifer DiMiceli, Myrica McCune, and Matt Noone processed most of the GIS data. We also thank three anonymous reviewers, who provided many helpful comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan K. Creutzburg.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Creutzburg, M.K., Halofsky, J.E., Halofsky, J.S. et al. Climate Change and Land Management in the Rangelands of Central Oregon. Environmental Management 55, 43–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0362-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0362-3

Keywords

Navigation