Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Method for Spatially Explicit Representation of Sub-watershed Sediment Yield, Southern California, USA

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present here a method to integrate geologic, topographic, and land-cover data in a geographic information system to provide a fine-scale, spatially explicit prediction of sediment yield to support management applications. The method is fundamentally qualitative but can be quantified using preexisting sediment-yield data, where available, to verify predictions using other independent data sets. In the 674-km2 Sespe Creek watershed of southern California, 30 unique “geomorphic landscape units” (GLUs, defined by relatively homogenous areas of geology, hillslope gradient, and land cover) provide a framework for discriminating relative rates of sediment yield across this landscape. Field observations define three broad groupings of GLUs that are well-associated with types, relative magnitudes, and rates of erosion processes. These relative rates were then quantified using sediment-removal data from nearby debris basins, which allow relatively low-precision but robust calculations of both local and whole-watershed sediment yields, based on the key assumption that minimal sediment storage throughout most of the watershed supports near-equivalency of long-term rates of hillslope sediment production and watershed sediment yield. The accuracy of these calculations can be independently assessed using geologically inferred uplift rates and integrated suspended sediment measurements from mainstem Sespe Creek, which indicate watershed-averaged erosion rates between about 0.6–1.0 mm year−1 and corresponding sediment yields of about 2 × 103 t km−2 year−1. A spatially explicit representation of sediment production is particularly useful in a region where wildfires, rapid urban development, and the downstream delivery of upstream sediment loads are critical drivers of both geomorphic processes and land-use management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews ED, Antweiler RC (2012) Sediment fluxes from California coastal rivers: the influences of climate, geology, and topography. J Geol 120:349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews E, Antweiler R, Neiman P, Ralph F (2004) Influence of ENSO on flood frequency along the California Coast. J Clim 17:337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argus DF, Heflin MB, Donnellan A, Webb FH, Dong D, Hurst KJ, Jefferson DC, Lyzenga GA, Watkins MM, Zumberge JF (1999) Shortening and thickening of metropolitan Los Angeles measured and inferred by using geodesy. Geology 27:703–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beighley RE, Dunne T, Melack JM (2005) Understanding and modeling basin hydrology: interpreting the hydrological signature. Hydrol Process 19:1333–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda L, Dunne T (1997) Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow. Water Resour Res 33:2849–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blythe AE, Burbank DW, Farley KA, Fielding EJ (2000) Structural and topographic evolution of the central Transverse Ranges, California, from apatite fissiontrack, (U/Th)/He and digital elevation model analyses. Basin Res 12:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth DB, Dusterhoff SR, Stein ED, Bledsoe BP (2010) Hydromodification Screening Tools: GIS-based catchment analyses of potential changes in runoff and sediment discharge. Technical Report 605. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA. Available at ftp://sccwrp.org/pub/download/DOCUMENTS/TechnicalReports/605_HydromodScreeningTools_GIS_ES.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov 2013

  • Brownlie WR, Taylor BD (1981) Coastal sediment delivery by major rivers in Southern California. Sediment management of southern California mountains, coastal plains, and shorelines. Environmental Quality Laboratory Report 17-C, 314. Part C, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

  • Buffington JM, Montgomery DR, Greenberg HM (2004) Basin-scale availability of salmonid spawning gravel as influenced by channel type and hydraulic roughness in mountain catchments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:2085–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbank DW, Leland J, Fielding E, Anderson RS, Brozovic N, Reid-Mary R, Duncan C (1996) Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas. Nature 379:505–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Wilson RC, Bowers JC, Laber JL (2008) Storm rainfall conditions for floods and debris flows from recently burned areas in southwestern Colorado and southern California. Geomorphology 96:250–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson MA, Kirkby M (1972) Hillslope form and process. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayan D, Redmond K, Riddle L (1999) ENSO and hydrologic extremes in the western United States. J Climate 12:2881–2893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çemen I (1989) Near-surface expression of the eastern part of the San Cayetano fault: a potentially active thrust fault in the California transverse ranges. J Geophys Res 94:9665–9677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis WM (1899) The geographical cycle. Geogr J 14:481–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibblee T (1985a) Geologic map of the Old Man Mountain quadrangle, Ventura County, California. Scale 1:24,000. Dibblee Geological Foundation, Santa Barbara

  • Dibblee T (1985b) Geologic map of the Wheeler Springs quadrangle, Ventura County, California. Scale 1:24,000. Dibblee Geological Foundation, Santa Barbara

  • Dibblee T (1987) Geologic map of the Lion Canyon quadrangle, Ventura County, California. Scale 1:24,000. Dibblee Geological Foundation, Santa Barbara

  • Dibblee T (1990a) Geologic map of the Fillmore quadrangle, Ventura County, California. Scale 1:24,000. Dibblee Geological Foundation, Santa Barbara

  • Dibblee T (1990b) Geologic map of the Santa Paula Peak quadrangle, Ventura County, California. Scale 1:24,000. Dibblee Geological Foundation, Santa Barbara

  • Dibblee T (1996a) Geologic map of the Devils Heart Peak quadrangle, Ventura County, California. Scale 1:24,000. Dibblee Geological Foundation, Santa Barbara

  • Dibblee T (1996b) Geologic map of the Topatopa quadrangle, Ventura County, California. Scale 1:24,000. Dibblee Geological Foundation, Santa Barbara

  • Dietrich WE, Dunne T (1978) Sediment budget for a small catchment in mountainous terrain. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie Supplementband 29:191–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich WE, Bellugi DG, Sklar LS, Stock JD, Heimsath AM, Roering JJ (2003) Geomorphic transport laws for predicting landscape form and dynamics. In: Wilcock P, Iverson RM (eds) Prediction in geomorphology. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 103–132

  • Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (2000) Soil water repellency, its characteristics, causes and hydro-geomorphological consequences. Earth Sci Rev 51:33–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan A, Hager BH, King RW (1993) Discrepancy between geological and geodetic deformation rates in the Ventura basin. Nature 366:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs PW, Booth DB (2011) Geomorphology in environmental management. In: Gregory KJ, Goudie AS (eds) The sage handbook of geomorphology. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 78–104

  • Downs PW, Gregory KJ (2004) River channel management: towards sustainable catchment hydrosystems. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T, Leopold LB (1978) Water in environmental planning. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall A, Kirby E, Burbank D (2004) Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in coastal California. J Geophys Res 109:F03002. doi:10.1029/2003JF000086

    Google Scholar 

  • England CB, Holtan HN (1969) Geomorphic grouping of soils in watershed engineering. J Hydrol 7:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England P, Molnar P (1990) Surface uplift, uplift of rocks, and exhumation of rocks. Geology 18:1173–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth KL, Milliman JD (2003) Effects of climatic and anthropogenic change on small mountainous rivers: the Salinas River example. Glob Planet Change 39:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabet EJ, Dunne T (2002) Landslides on coastal sage-scrub and grassland hillslopes in a severe El Niño winter: the effects of vegetation conversion on sediment delivery. Geol Soc Am Bull 114:983–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabet EJ, Dunne T (2003) A stochastic sediment delivery model for a steep Mediterranean landscape. Water Resour Res 39:1237. doi:10.1029/2003WR002341

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert GK (1904) Domes and dome structure of the High Sierra. Geol Soc Am Bull 15:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger DE, Riebe CS (2007) Cosmogenic nuclides in weathering and erosion. In: Drvor JI (ed) Treatise on geochemistry, vol 5: surface and ground water, weathering, and soils. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutowski VP (1978) Stream terraces along Sespe Creek, Ventura County, California. In: Fritsche AE (ed) Depositional environments of Tertiary rocks along Sespe Creek, Ventura County, California. Pacific Coast Paleogeography 3. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, pp 60–72

  • Heimsath AM (1998) The soil production function. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

  • Heimsath AM, Dietrich WE, Nishiizumi K, Finkel RC (1997) The soil production function and landscape equilibrium. Nature 388:358–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks D, Hill MJ, Shankar U (1996) Variation of suspended sediment yields around New Zealand: the relative importance of rainfall and geology. IAHS Publ Ser 236:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Huftile GJ, Yeats RS (1995) Convergence rates across a displacement transfer zone in the western Transverse Ranges, Ventura basin, California. J Geophys Res 100:2043–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman DL, Jenkins SA (1999) Climate change and the episodicity of sediment flux of small California rivers. J Geol 107:251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwahashi J, Pike RJ (2007) Automated classifications of topography from DEMs by an unsupervised nested-means algorithm and a three-part geometric signature. Geomorphology 86:409–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell PIA (2005) Why the universal soil loss equation and the revised version of it do not predict event erosion well. Hydrol Process 19:851–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner JW, Finkel RC, Riebe CS, Granger DE, Clayton JL, Megahan WF (2001) Mountain erosion over 10 yr, 10 k.y., and 10 m.y. time scales. Geology 29:591–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavé J, Burbank D (2004) Denudation processes and rates in the Transverse Ranges, southern California: erosional response of a transitional landscape to external and anthropogenic forcing. J Geophys Res 109:F01006. doi:10.1029/2003JF000023

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall ST, Cooke ML, Owen SE (2008) Effects of nonplanar fault topology and mechanical interaction on fault-slip distributions in the Ventura Basin, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:1113–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhee J (1988) The control of nature: Los Angeles against the mountains. The New Yorker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meigs A, Yuleb D, Blythe AE, Burbank D (2003) Implications of distributed crustal deformation for exhumation in a portion of a transpressional plate boundary, Western Transverse Ranges, southern California. Quatern Int 101–102:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf JG (1994) Morphology, chronology, and deformation of Pleistocene marine terraces, southwestern Santa Barbara County, California. Master’s thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara

  • Milliman JD, Syvitski JPM (1992) Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountain rivers. J Geol 100:525–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minear T, Kondolf GM (2009) Estimating reservoir sedimentation rates at large spatial and temporal scales: a case study of California. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2007WR006703

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR (1999) Process domains and the river continuum. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35:397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody JA, Smith JD (2005) Critical shear stress for erosion of cohesive soils subjected to temperatures typical of wildfires. J Geophys Res 110:F01004. doi:10.1029/2004JF000141

    Google Scholar 

  • Orme AR (1998) Late Quaternary tectonism along the Pacific coast of the Californias: a contrast in style. In: Stewart RL, Vita-Finzi C (eds) Coastal tectonics, special publication 146. Geological Society, London, pp 179–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier JD (2012) A spatially distributed model for the long-term suspended sediment discharge and delivery ratio of drainage basins. J Geophys Res 117:F02028. doi:10.1029/2011JF002129

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MD, Bryant WA, Cramer CH, Cao T, Reichle M, Frankel AD, Lienkaemper JJ, McCrory MA, Schwartz DP (1996) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the state of California. USGS Open-File Report 96–706

  • Peterson MD, Wesnousky SG (1994) Fault slip rates and earthquake histories for active faults in southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:1608–1649

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter N and Vestal WD (2005) El Niño-driven landsliding and postgrazing recovery, Santa Cruz Islands, California. J Geophys Res, 110, F2. doi:10.1029/2004JF000203

  • Portenga EW, Bierman PR (2011) Understanding Earth’s eroding surface with 10Be. GSA Today. doi:10.1130/G111A.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser IP, Williams L (1998) The effect of wildfire on runoff and erosion in native Eucalyptus forest. Hydrol Process 12:251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Scharrón CE, MacDonald LH (2007) Development and application of a GIS-based sediment budget model. J Environ Manag 84:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid LM, Dunne T (1996) Rapid construction of sediment budgets for drainage basins. Catena-Verlag, Cremlingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse LM, Nearing MA, Nicks AD, Laflen JM (1993) Error assessment in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:825–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell TK (1988) Neotectonics of the San Cayetano fault, Transverse Ranges, California. Geol Soc Am Bull 100:500–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romans BW, Normark WR, McGann MM, Covault JA, Graham SA (2009) Holocene Santa Monica Basin, California: implications for evaluating source-to-sink flux at millennial time scales. Geol Soc Am Bull 121:1394–1408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe PB, Countryman CM, Storey HC (1949) Probable peak discharges and erosion rates from Southern California watersheds as influenced by fire. US Forest Service report

  • Scott K, Williams RP (1978) Erosion and sediment yields in the Transverse Ranges, southern California. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1030

  • Selby MJ (1982) Hillslope materials and processes. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakesby RA, Doerr SH (2006) Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent. Earth Sci Rev 74:269–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spotila JA, House MA, Blythe AE, Niemi NA, Blank GC (2002) Controls on the erosion and geomorphic evolution of the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains, southern California. In: Barth A (ed) Contributions to crustal evolution of the southwestern United States. Special Paper 365. The Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, pp 205–230

  • Trecker MA, Gurrola LD, Keller EA (1998) Oxygen-isotope correlation of marine terraces and uplift of the Mesa Hills, Santa Barbara, California, USA. Geol Soc Spec Publ 146:57–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA NCSS (US Department of Agriculture, National Cooperative Soil Survey) (2012) Soil survey geographic (SSURGO) database

  • USFS (US Forest Service) (2006) 2006 Day Fire burned area emergency response (BAER) assessment. 2006 Day Fire Los Padres Portion Initial 2500-6, version 11-15-06

  • VCWPD (Ventura County Watershed Protection District) (2005) Debris and detention basins. Ventura, California

  • Walling DE, Webb BW (1983) Patterns of sediment yield. In: Gregory KJ (ed) Background to paleohydrology: Wiley, Chichester, pp 69–100

  • Warrick JA, Farnsworth KL (2009) Sources of sediment to the coastal waters of the Southern California Bight. In: Lee HJ, Normark WR (eds) Earth sciences in the urban ocean: the southern California continental borderland. Geological Society of America Special Paper 454, Boulder, CO, pp 39–52

  • Warrick JA, Mertes LAK (2009) Sediment yield from the tectonically active semiarid Western Transverse Ranges of California. Bull Geol Soc Am 121:1054–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells WG II (1981) Some effects of brushfires on erosion processes in coastal Southern California. In: Davies TRH, Pearse AJ (eds) Erosion and sediment transport in Pacific Rim Steeplands Symposium. Association of Hydrological Sciences, Christchurch, pp 305–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells WG II (1987) The effects of fire on the generation of debris flows in southern California. Geol Soc Am Rev Eng Geol 7:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R (1979) Sediment discharge in the Santa Clara River basin, Ventura and Los Angeles counties, California. US Geological Survey, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills CJ, Weldon II RJ, Bryant WA (2008) Appendix A: California fault parameters for the National Seismic Hazard Maps and working group on California earthquake probabilities 2007. USGS Open File Report 2007–1437A

  • Wohlgemuth PM and Hubbert KR (2008) The effects of fire on soil hydrologic properties and sediment fluxes in chaparral steeplands, southern California. In: Narog MG (ed) Proceedings of the 2002 Fire Conference: managing fire and fuels in the remaining wildlands and open spaces of the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-189. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Research Station, Albany, pp 115–121

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to colleagues with whom we discussed the development of this approach and who helped in the field: John Wooster, Jay Stallman, and Cliff Reibe. Rafael Real de Asua and Eric Panzer were instrumental in developing and executing the GIS analysis and in helping to draft the maps. The field work and much of the preliminary analysis were funded by the Ventura County Watershed Protection District in support of their assessment of post-fire flood risks to the town of Fillmore. Thanks also to the U.S. Forest Service–Ojai Ranger District office for granting access to all areas of the Los Padres National Forest for our field surveys, the U.S. Forest Service–Los Padres National Forest for sharing compiled geologic data and Day Fire spatial data, and Kevin Schmidt (USGS) for useful post-fire sediment production information from their ongoing study in the Day Fire area. Peter Wohlgemuth (USFS) reviewed a draft of the preliminary report for Ventura County, and shared valuable insights into sediment production and fire effects in this dynamic landscape. Our thanks also to the journal editors and two anonymous reviewers for careful and thoughtful evaluations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA

    Derek B. Booth

  2. Stillwater Sciences, 2855 Telegraph Ave #400, Berkeley, CA, 94705, USA

    Derek B. Booth, Glen Leverich, Peter W. Downs, Scott Dusterhoff & Sebastian Araya

  3. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

    Peter W. Downs

  4. San Francisco Estuary Institute, 4911 Central Avenue, Richmond, CA, 94804, USA

    Scott Dusterhoff

Authors
  1. Derek B. Booth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Glen Leverich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter W. Downs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Scott Dusterhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sebastian Araya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek B. Booth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Booth, D.B., Leverich, G., Downs, P.W. et al. A Method for Spatially Explicit Representation of Sub-watershed Sediment Yield, Southern California, USA. Environmental Management 53, 968–984 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0251-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0251-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation