Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

International and European Law on Protected Areas and Climate Change: Need for Adaptation or Implementation?

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The protection and management of protected areas must be adapted to the effects of climate change. An important question is if the law on protected areas is capable of dealing with the required changes. In general, both international nature conventions and European Union nature conservation law do not contain any specific provisions on climate change and protected areas. Attention has been paid to this link in non-binding decisions and policy documents. In order to adapt the law to increased dynamics from climate change, more flexibility is needed. This flexibility should not be understood as “legal” flexibility, in the sense of the weakening nature conservation provisions. Scientific uncertainties on the effects of climate change might conflict with the need for legal certainties. In order to adapt to the effects of climate change, the two crucial elements are the strengthening of core protected areas and connectivity between the core areas. At the international level, both elements can be found in non-binding documents. International law enables the required adaptation; however, it often lacks concrete obligations. A stronger legal framework can be found at the level of the European Union. The Birds and Habitats Directives contain sufficient tools to deal with the effects of climate change. The Directives have been insufficiently implemented so far. Especially the central goals of reaching a favorable conservation status and connectivity measures need to be addressed much more in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araújo M, Alagador D, Cabeza M, Nogués-Bravo D, Thuiller W (2011) Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters 14:484–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron J, Gunderson L, Allen G, Fleishman E, McKenzie D, Meyerson L, Oropeza J, Stephenson N (2009) Options for national parks and reserves for adapting to climate change. Environmental Management 44:1033–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastmeijer C, Willems K (2010) ‘Robuust, verbonden en …beschermd’. Past een klimaatbestendig natuurbeleid met aandacht voor ‘wilde natuur’—beleving in het juridische Natura 2000-jasje? In: Backes C et al. Natuur(lijk) met recht beschermd: naar een effectieve en hanteerbare natuurbescherming. Boom Juridische uitgevers, Den Haag, pp 85–115

  • Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F (2012) Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15:365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman M (2010) Conserving biological diversity in an era of climate change: local implementation of international wildlife treaties. German Yearbook of International Law 53:288–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns W (2009) Belt and suspenders? The World Heritage Convention’s role in confronting climate change. RECIEL 18:148–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A et al (2009) Review of the literature on the links between biodiversity and climate change. Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal CBD Technical Series No. 42

  • Cliquet A, Backes C, Harris J, Howsam P (2009) Adaptation to climate change: legal challenges for protected areas. Utrecht Law Review 5:158–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliquet A, Harris J, Howsam P, Backes C (2010) Response to ‘Protected areas and climate change. Reflections from a practitioner’s perspective’. Utrecht Law Review 6:149–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Paris, 16 November 1972. http://whc.unesco.org

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 5 June 1992. http://www.cbd.int

  • Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Bern, 19 September 1979

  • Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, Bonn, 23 June 1979. http://www.cms.int

  • Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat, Iran, 2 February 1971. http://www.ramsar.org

  • Craig R (2010) “Stationary is dead”—long live transformation: five principles for climate change adaptation law. Harvard Environmental Law Review 34:9–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the Conservation of Wild Birds, OJ L 20, 26 January 2010, replacing the original Birds Directive, Directive 79/409/EEG of 2 April 1979 on the Conservation of Wild Birds, OJ L 103, 25 April 1979 (Birds Directive)

  • Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora, OJ L 206, 22 July 1992 (Habitats Directive)

  • Dodd A (2008) EU nature directives: rights, responsibilities and results—are we striking the right balance? Environmental Law & Management 20:237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd A, Hardiman A, Jennings K, Williams G (2010) Protected areas and climate change. Reflections from a practitioner’s perspective. Utrecht Law Review 6:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Managing Natura 2000 sites: The provisions of Article 6 of the ‘Habitats’ Directive 92/43/EEC. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006a) Communication from the Commission, Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010—and beyond—sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being. COM 2006:0216

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006b) Annex 1, EU action plan to 2010 and beyond, Annex to the Communication from the Commission, halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010—and beyond—sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being, COM(2006) 0216

  • European Commission (2007) Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC

  • European Commission (2009a) White paper, adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action. COM(2009) 147 final

  • European Commission (2009b) Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Composite Report on the conservation status of habitat types and species as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. COM(2009) 358 final

  • European Commission (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, COM(2011) 244 final

  • European Commission (2013a) Guidelines on climate change and Natura 2000: dealing with the impact of climate change on the management of the natura 2000 network of areas of high biodiversity value, Technical Report 2013-068

  • European Commission (2013b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Green Infrastructure (GI)—Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital, COM(2013) 249 final

  • European Court of Justice (1993) Case C-335/90. Commission v, Spain (Marismas de Santoña)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2002) Case C-117/00. Commission v, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2004) Case C-209/04. Commission v, Austria (Lauteracher Ried)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2005) Case C-6/04. Commission v, United Kingdom (Gibraltar)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2006) Case C-191/05. Portuguese Republic, Commission of the European Communities v

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2007a) Case C-418/04. Commission v, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2007b) Case C-183/05. Commission v, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2010) Case C-535/07. Commission v, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2011) Case C-404/09. Commission v, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L, Midgley G, Andelman S, Araújo M, Hughes G, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R, Williams P (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front Ecol Environ 5:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller N, Zavaleta E (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142:14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendler R, Rödder D, Veith M (2010) Flexibilisierung des schutzgebietsnetzes Natura 2000 vor dem hintergrund des klimawandels. Natur und Recht 32:685–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochkirch A et al (2013) Europe needs a new vision for a Natura 2020 Network. Conservation Letters 00:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pp

  • Kettunen M, Terry A, Tucker G, Jones A (2007) Guidance on the maintenance of landscape features of major importance for wild flora and fauna—guidance on the implementation of Article 3 of the Birds Directive (79/409/EEC) and Article 10 of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC). Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, 114 pp & Annexes. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/docs/adaptation_fragmentation_guidelines.pdf

  • Lawler J (2009) Climate change adaptation strategies for resource management and conservation planning. The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 1162:79–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley J, O’Malley R, Ojima D (2009) A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 23:1080–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala O et al (2000) Biodiversity—global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoukens H (2011) Temporary nature: Is European nature conservation law ready for it? ELNI review 10

  • Schumacher A, Schumacher J (2013) Tauglichkeit der Vogelschutz- und FFH-Richtlinie für anpassungen an den klimawandel. Natur und Recht 35:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C (2011a) Anthropocene park? No alternative. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:497–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C (2011b) Translocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:216–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo M, Sykes M, Prentice C (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. PNAS 10223:8245–8250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis J (2003) Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:467–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst A (2009) International nature conservation law and the adaptation of biodiversity to climate change: a mismatch? Journal of Environmental Law 21:419–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst A (2011) Conserving European biodiversity in a changing climate: the Bern Convention, the European Union Birds and Habitats Directives and the adaptation of nature to climate change. RECIEL 20:62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst A (2012) Transboundary wildlife conservation in a changing climate: adaptation of the Bonn Convention on migratory species and its daughter instruments to climate change. Diversity 4:258–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst A (in press) The Habitats Directive and climate change: Is the law climate proof? In: Born C-H, Schoukens H, Cliquet A, Misonne D, Van Hoorick G (eds) The Habitats Directive in its EU environmental law context: European nature’s best hope? Routledge, Oxford

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, 9 May 1992. http://unfccc.int/

  • van Leeuwen B, Opdam P (2003) Klimaatsverandering vergt aanpassing van het natuurbeleid. De Levende Natuur 104:122–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuuren J (2007) Adaptatie aan klimaatverandering vraagt om adaptatie van de wet. Nederlands Juristenblad 45(46):2880

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuuren J (2008) Ramsar soft law is not soft at all. Discussion of the 2007 decision by the Netherlands Crown on the Lac Ramsar site on the island of Bonaire. http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/wurc/wurc_verschuuren_bonaire.pdf

  • Verschuuren J (2010) Climate change: rethinking restoration in the European Union’s Birds and Habitats Directives. Ecological Restoration 28:431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuuren J (in press) Connectivity: is Natura 2000 only an ecological network on paper? In: Born C-H, Schoukens H, Cliquet A, Misonne D, Van Hoorick G (eds) The Habitats Directive in its EU environmental law context: European nature’s best hope? Routledge, Oxford

  • Vilà M, Hulme P (2011) Jurassic park? No thanks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:496–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler K (2006) Bird protection & climate changes: a challenge for Natura 2000? Tilburg Foreign Law Review 13:283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis K, Bhagwat S (2009) Biodiversity and climate change. Science 326:806–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp H (2007) Integratiedebat in het natuurbeschermingsbeleid. Nederlands Juristenblad 45(46):2884

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp H (2009) Dynamische natuur in een statische rechtsorde. Milieu & Recht 3:134–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public International Law, Ghent University, Universiteitstraat 4, 9000, Gent, Belgium

    A. Cliquet

Authors
  1. A. Cliquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Cliquet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cliquet, A. International and European Law on Protected Areas and Climate Change: Need for Adaptation or Implementation?. Environmental Management 54, 720–731 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0228-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0228-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation