Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Land Use, Spatial Scale, and Stream Systems: Lessons from an Agricultural Region

Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We synthesized nine studies that examined the influence of land use at different spatial scales in structuring biotic assemblages and stream channel characteristics in southeastern Minnesota streams. Recent studies have disagreed about the relative importance of catchment versus local characteristics in explaining variation in fish assemblages. Our synthesis indicates that both riparian- and catchment-scale land use explained significant variation in water quality, channel morphology, and fish distribution and density. Fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages can be positively affected by increasing the extent of perennial riparian and upland vegetation. Our synthesis is robust; more than 425 stream reaches were examined in an area that includes a portion of three ecoregions. Fishes ranged from coldwater to warmwater adapted. We suggest that efforts to rehabilitate stream system form and function over the long term should focus on increasing perennial vegetation in both riparian areas and uplands and on managing vegetation in large, contiguous blocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Literature Cited

  • Allan J. D. 1995 Stream ecology: Structure and function of running waters. Chapman & Hall, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan J. D., D. L. Erickson, J. Fay. 1997 The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Barling R. D., I. D. Moore. 1994 Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: A review. Environmental Management 18:543–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton D. R., W. D. Taylor, R. M. Biette. 1985 Dimensions of riparian buffer strips required to maintain trout habitat in southern Ontario streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 5:364–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky A. J., A. Matzke, S. Uselman 1999 Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54:419–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman H. E., C. F. Rabeni 1987 Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environmental Biology of Fishes 18:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschta R. L., W. S. Platts 1986 Morphological features of small streams: significance and function. Water Resources Bulletin 22:369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. W. 1858. History of Fillmore County, Minnesota, with an outline of her resources, advantages, and the inducements she offers to those seeking homes in the west. Chatfield, Minnesota 40 pp

  • Blann, K. L. 2000. Catchment and riparian scale influences on coldwater streams and stream fish in southeastern Minnesota. M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota

  • Blann, K. L. 2004. Landscape-scale analysis of stream fish communities and habitats: Lessons from southeastern Minnesota. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota

  • Blann K. L., J. F. Nerbonne, B. Vondracek 2002 Relationship of riparian buffer type to physical habitat and stream temperature. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boody, G., and M. Krinke. 2001. The multiple benefits of agriculture: an economic, environmental, and social analysis. Last accessed 27 April 2005 http://www.landstewardshipproject.org/programs_mba.hmtl

  • Boody G., B. Vondracek, D. A. Andow, M. Krinke, J. Westra, J. Zimmerman, P. Welle 2005 Multifunctional agriculture in the United States. BioScience 55:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Broussard W. L., D. F. Farrell, H. W. Anderson, Jr., and P. E. Felsheim. 1975. Water resources of the Root River watershed, southeastern Minnesota. Hydraulic Investigations Atlas HA-548, Department of Interior, U. S. Geologic Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota

  • Castelle, A. J., and A. W. Johnson. 2000. Riparian vegetation effectiveness. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Technical Bulletin No. 799. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. 26 pp

  • Chung S. O., A. D. Ward, C. W. Schalk 1992 Evaluation of the hydrologic component of the ADAPT water table management model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 35:571–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark E. A. 1998 Landscape variables affecting livestock impacts on water quality in the humid temperate zone. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. B., and B. Vondracek. 1998. Fish and invertebrate communities in the Whitewater River Watershed: A GIS based examination of land use effects. Final Report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Water Resources Division, Nonpoint Source Section, St. Paul, Minnesota, 46 pp

  • Crook D. A., A. I. Robertson, A. J. King, P. Humphries 2001 The influence of spatial scale and habitat arrangement on diel patterns of habitat use by two lowland river fishes. Oecologia 129:525–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Delong M. D., M. A. Brusven 1991 Classification and spatial mapping of riparian habitat with applications toward management of streams impacted by nonpoint source pollution. Environmental Management 15:565–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch K. D., C. E. Torgersen, C. V. Baxter, H. W. Li 2002 Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52:483–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch L., B. W. Adams 1998 Can cows and fish coexist? Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick F. A., B. C. Scudder, B. N. Lenz, D. J. Sullivan 2001 Effects of multi-scale environmental characteristics on agricultural stream biota in eastern Wisconsin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1489–1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert W. A., W. R. Krug 1996 Streamflow trends in Wisconsin’s Driftless Area. Water Resources Bulletin 32:733–744

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gergel S. E., M. G. Turner, J. R. Miller, J. M. Melack, E. H. Stanley 2002 Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquatic Science 64:118–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghidey F., E. E. Alberts 1998 Runoff and soil losses as affected by corn and soybean tillage systems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 53:64–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan C., K. D. Fausch 1996 Long-term demographic responses of trout populations to habitat manipulation in six Colorado streams. Ecological Applications 6:931–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda P. A., A. Ward, D. White, J. Lyon, E. Desmond 1999 The sensitivity of ADAPT model predictions of streamflows to parameters used to define hydrologic response units. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 42:381–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E. B. D. III, G. S. Helfman, J. O. Harper, P. V. Bolstad 1999 Effects of riparian forest removal on fish assemblages in southern Appalachian streams. Conservation Biology 13:1454–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan T. E., D. L. Correll, D. E. Weller 1993. Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland. Journal of Environmental Quality 22:467–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr J. R., I. J. Schlosser 1978 Water resources and the land-water interface. Science 201:229–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman J. B., W. C. Krueger 1984 Livestock impacts on riparian ecosystems and streamside management implications: a review. Journal of Range Management 37:430–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle R. A., R. L. Binger, G. R. Foster, E. H. Grassing 1996 Effect of land use changes on sediment transport in Goodwin Creek. Water Resources Research 32:3189–3196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, T. J. 1993. Influence of physical and biotic factors on trout production dynamics in southeastern Minnesota streams. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota

  • Lammert M., J. D. Allan 1999 Assessing biotic integrity of streams: Effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure of fish and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management 23:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K. E., R. M. Goldstein, P. E. Hanson 2001 Relation between fish communities and riparian zone conditions at two spatial scales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1465–1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat D. R. 1984 Agriculture and stream water quality; a biological evaluation of erosion control practices. Environmental Management 8:333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1966. A sand county almanac. Oxford University Press, 295 pp

  • Leopold L. P. 1994. A view of the river. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 298

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom M. J., T. E. Schumacher, N. P. Congo, M. L. Bleach 1998 Tillage effects on water runoff and soil erosion after sod. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 53:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R., R. G. Williams, S. P. Invader, D. D. Bosch, J. M. Sheridan 2001 Evaluation of coastal plain conservation buffers using the riparian ecosystem management model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1445–1455

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lueth R. A. 1994 Soil survey of Winona County, Minnesota: U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp 278

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons J., S. W. Trimble, L. K. Paine 2000a Grass versus trees: managing riparian areas to benefit streams of central North America. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 26:919–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons J., B. M. Weasel, L. K. Paine, D. J. Undersander 2000b Influence of intensive rotational grazing on bank erosion, fish habitat quality, and fish communities in southwestern Wisconsin trout streams. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55:271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel B. W., J. B. Barnum, L. M. Antioch 1984 Ecological alterations of Iowa prairie-agricultural streams. Iowa State Journal of Research 59:5–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D. R. 1997 What’s best on the banks? Nature 388:328–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D.R. 1999 Process domains and the river continuum. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:397–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D. R., and J. M. Buffington 1998. Channel processes, classification, and response. Pages 13–42 In R. J. Caiman, R. E. Bilby (eds). River ecology and management: Lessons from the Pacific coastal ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, New York pp 13–42

  • Montgomery D. R., G. E. Grant, K. Sullivan 1997 Watershed analysis as a framework for implementing ecosystem management. Water Resources Bulletin 31:369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerbonne B. A., B. Vondracek 2001 Effects of land use on benthic macroinvertebrates and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota. Environmental Management 28:87–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe C. P., J. O. Jensen 1996 Channel suspended sediment and fisheries: A synthesis for quantitative assessment of risk and impact. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:693–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1977. Nonpoint source stream nutrient level relationships: A nationwide study. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, EPA 600/3-77-105, 151 pp

  • Omernik, J. M., and A. L. Gallant. 1988. Ecoregions of the upper Midwest states. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, EPA/600/3-88-037

  • Osborne L. L., D. A. Kovacic 1993 Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology 29:243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne L. L., M. J. Wiley 1988 Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Management 26:9–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn W. T., D. L. Correll 1984 Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466–1475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A. M. 1993 Effects of electric transmission rights-of way on trout in forested headwater streams in New York. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13:581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, J. C. Stromberg 1997 The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47:769–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter K. M., F. W. Cubbage, G. B. Blank, R. H. Schaberg 2004 A watershed-scale model for predicting nonpoint pollution risk in North Carolina. Environmental Management 34:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni C. F., M. A. Smale 1995 Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zone. Hydrobiologia 303:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Razavian D. 1990 Hydrologic responses of an agricultural watershed to various hydrologic and management conditions. Water Resources Bulletin 26:777–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C., G. E. Host, J. W. Arthur 1993 Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwater Biology 29:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C., L. B. Johnson, G. E. Host 1996 Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(suppl 1):295–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen D. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland hydrology, Pagosa Springs, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl P. M. 1995 Surface water quality assessment of the upper Illionis River basin in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin; analysis of relations between fish community structure and environmental conditions in the Fox, Des Plaines, and Du Page River basins in Illinois, 1982-84. U.S. Geological Survey, water resources investigations report 94-4094

  • Schlosser I. J. 1982 Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecological Monographs 52:395–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser I. J., J. R. Karr 1981 Riparian vegetation and channel morphology impact on spatial patterns of water quality in agricultural watersheds. Environmental Management 5:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer B. M., J. R. Miner, J. A. Moore, J. C. Buckhouse 1988 Resuspending organisms from a rangeland stream bottom. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 31:1217–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A., E. Longendoen, R. Bingner, R. Wells, Y. Yaun, and C. Alonso. 2004. Suspended-sediment transport and bed-material characteristics of Shades Creek, Alabama and Ecoregion 67: Developing water-quality criteria for suspended and bed-material sediment. USDA-ARS National Sediment Laboratory Technical Report 34. Oxford, Mississippi

  • Simonson, T. D., J. Lyons, and P. D. Kanehl. 1994. Guidelines for evaluating fish habitat in Wisconsin streams. USDA-Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NC-164, 36 pp

  • Sovell L. A., B. Vondracek, J. A. Frost, K. G. Mumford 2000 Impacts of rotational grazing and riparian buffers on physicochemical and biological characteristics of southeastern Minnesota streams. Environmental Management 26:629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer J. C., R. M. Goldstein, R. M. Newman 2000 Relationship of wooded riparian zones and runoff potential to fish community composition in agricultural streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J. S., L. Wang, J. Lyons, J. A. Horwatich, R. Bannerman 2001 Influences of watershed, riparian-corridor, and reach-scale characteristics on aquatic biota in agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1475–1487

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand M., R. W. Merritt 1999 Impacts of livestock grazing activities on stream insect communities and the riverine environment. American Entomologist 45:13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. 1987–1992 CANOCO—A FORTRAN program for Canonical Community Ordination. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York

  • Thorn, W. C., and C. S. Anderson. 1993. Summer habitat requirements of large brown trout in southeast Minnesota streams. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Section of Fisheries. Investigational Report no. 428. St. Paul, Minnesota, 15 pp

  • Thorn W. C., C. S. Anderson, W. E. Lorenzen, D. L. Hendrickson, J. W. Wagner 1997 A review of trout management in Southeast Minnesota streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:860–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons D. R., R. F. Holt 1977 Nutrient losses in surface runoff from a native prairie. Journal of Environmental Quality 6:369–373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble S. W. 1993 The distributed sediment budget model and watershed management in the Paleozoic Plateau of the upper Midwestern United States. Physical Geography 14:285–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble S. W. 1994 Erosional effects of cattle on streambanks in Tennessee, U.S.A. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 19:451–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble S. W. 1997 Stream channel erosion and change resulting from riparian forests. Geology 25:467–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble S. W. 1999 Decreased rates of alluvial sediment storage in the Coon Creek basin, Wisconsin, 1975–93. Science 285:1244–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, S. W., and S. W. Lund. 1982. Soil conservation and the reduction of erosion and sedimentation in the Coon Creek basin, Wisconsin. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1234. Washington, D.C., 35 pp

  • Trimble S. W., A. C. Mendel 1995 The cow as a geomorphic agent—a critical review. Geomophology 13:233–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Troelstrup N. H., J. A. Perry 1989 Water quality in southeastern Minnesota streams: Observations along a gradient of land use and geology. Journal of Minnesota Academy of Science 55:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufford D. L., H. N. McKellar, J. R. Hussey 1998 In-stream nonpoint source nutrient prediction with land-use proximity and seasonality. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:100–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaché K. B., J. M. Eilers, M. V. Santelmann 2002 Water quality modeling of alternative agricultural scenarios in the US Corn Belt. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:773–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sickle J., J. Baker, A. Herlihy, P. Bayley, S. Gregory, P. Haggerty, L. Ashkenas, J. Li 2004 Projecting the biological condition of streams under alternative scenarios of human land use. Ecological Applications 14:368–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Vondracek B., J. K. H. Zimmerman, J. V. Westra 2003 Setting an effective TMDL for suspended sediment: An assessment of sediment loading and effects of suspended sediment on fish. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39:1005–1015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl, R. Gatti 1997 Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl 2002 Effects of watershed best management practices on habitat and fish in Wisconsin streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:663–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L., J. Lyons, P. Rasmussen, P. Seelbach, T. Simon, M. Wiley, P. Kanehl, E. Baker, S. Niemela, P. M. Stewart 2003 Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:491–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters T. F. 1977 The streams and rivers of Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 373 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters T. F. 1995. Sediment in streams: Sources, biological effects and control. American Fisheries Society monograph no. 7, Bethesda, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wente S. P. 2000. Proximity based measure of land use impacts to aquatic ecosystem integrity. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 194:1148–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley M. J., S. L. Kohler, P. W. Seelbach 1997 Reconciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities: Lessons from Michigan trout streams. Freshwater Biology 37:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin D. C., S. J. Hebel 1982 Erosion, redeposition, and delivery of sediment to Midwestern streams. Water Resources Research 18:1278–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman J. K. H., B. Vondracek, J. V. Westra 2003 Agricultural land use effects on sediment loading and fish assemblages in two Minnesota (USA) watersheds. Environmental Management 32:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R. C., J. C. Goodlett, G. H. Comer 1967 The influence of vegetation on channel form of small streams. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication 75:255–275

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kelly Burnett, Faith Fitzpatrick, Jeffrey Schuldt and three anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that improved an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Vondracek.

Additional information

Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly sponsered by U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division, the University of Minnesota, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Wildlife Management Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vondracek, B., Blann, K.L., Cox, C.B. et al. Land Use, Spatial Scale, and Stream Systems: Lessons from an Agricultural Region. Environmental Management 36, 775–791 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0039-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0039-z

Keywords

Navigation