Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From Management to Mediation: Local Forestry Management and the Forestry Crisis in Post-Socialist Russia

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The local branches of the Russian Forestry Service, the leskhozy, were known for their efficiency and management skills in the Soviet era and were one of the very few community-based “Soviet-type” institutions to survive the transition. This article examines the role of the leskhozy in the new market economy. Our analysis is based on data from interviews with informants attached to the forestry sector in the Murmansk area. In some cases their knowledge of the leskhozy stretches back to the emergence of the system in 1947. Our principal finding is that the struggle to survive as a federal body in the current legal and economic climate is forcing the leskhozy to relegate sustainable forestry management, presumably their primary raison d’être, to the lower portions of their list of priorities. Several consequences result. There is a heightened incidence of illegal logging, and corruption informs the allocation of forest areas to private interests. Stumpage prices have plummeted as timber from subsidized commercial cutting (ostensibly sanitary cutting or thinning) has flooded the markets. The root cause of these tribulations lies with the market-based harvesting permit system. Its introduction in the 1990s did little to eliminate the self-seeking practices of the old Soviet forestry management hierarchies. In the free market, local forestry managers can turn their dual responsibilities to their own advantage inasmuch as they control the allocation of harvesting permits while at the same time controlling logging practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. R. Árnason (1990) The Icelandic fisheries: evolution and management of a fishing industry Blackwell Science Oxford 172

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Blandon (1983) Soviet forest industries Westview Press Boulder, Colorado 290 pp

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Boycko A. Shleier R. Vishny (1995) Privatizing Russia MIT Press Cambridge 176 pp

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Brox (1989) Kan bygdenæringene bli lØnnsomme? Gyldendal Oslo 182 pp

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Burawoy (1996) ArticleTitleThe state and economic involution: Russia through a China lens World Development 6 1105–1117 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0305-750X(96)00022-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlsson, L. 2000. Management, resilience and the strategy of the commons. Paper presented at The Eighth Biennial Conference of the International Association of the Study of Common Property, May 31–June 3, Bloomington, Indiana.

  7. Carlsson, L., N.G. Lundgren, M. O. Olsson, and M. Y. Varakin. 1999. Institutions and the emergence of markets—transition in the Arkangelsk forest sector. Interim report no. 21, Institute of Applied System Analyses.

  8. T. Eggertsson (1990) Economic behavior and institutions Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature Cambridge 376 pp

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Eikeland L. Riabova (2002a) ArticleTitleThe battle for the resource rent: securing the profit from forest and fish resources in northern Russia post 1990 Europe-Asia Studies 7 1085–1100 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0966813022000017140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Eikeland L. Riabova (2002b) ArticleTitleTransition in cold climate: management regimes and rural marginalisation in northwest Russia Sociologia Ruralis 3 250–264

    Google Scholar 

  11. Filonenko, I. 1993. Vospominanie o russkom lese. Komrid, Moscow.

  12. H. Gordon (1954) ArticleTitleThe economic theory of a common property resource: the fishery Canadian Journal of Political Economy 62 124–142 Occurrence Handle10.1086/257497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Hobsbawn (1994) Age of extremes Michael Joseph London 588 pp

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ivanova, L., and V. Nygaard. 1999. Institutions and the emergence of markets—transition in the Murmansk forest sector. Interim report 99-071, International Institute of Applied System Analyses, 84 pp.

  15. Klose, F. 1985. A brief history of the German forest, achievements and mistakes down the ages. Deutche Gesellschaft für Technischen Zisammenarbeit, Eschborn.

  16. R. Levacic (1991) Markets and government: an overview G. Thompson J. Frances R. Levacic J. Mitchell (Eds) Markets hierarchies and networks Sage Publications London 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  17. MalmlØf, T. 1997. The institutional framework of the Russian forest sector. A historical background. Pages 7–30 in Carlsson L. and Olsson M. O. (eds.), Initial analyses of the institutional framework of the Russian forest sector, interim report 98-027. International Institute for Applied System Analyses.

  18. D. Moran (2001) ArticleTitleForestry villages in the Russian north—social capital and subsistence at the margins Belgian Journal of Geography 3 199–213

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nilsson, S., and A. Shivedenko. 1997. The Russian forest sector: a position paper for the World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development. Paper presented at the WCFSD Meeting in St. Petersburg 23–24 September 1997, St. Petersburg, 55 pp.

  20. A. Nove (1987) The Soviet economic system Allen and Unwin Winchester 399 pp

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Pallot D. Moran (2000) ArticleTitleSurviving the margins in the post-Soviet Russia: forestry villages in the northern Perm’ Oblast Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 41 341–364

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Palott (2002) ArticleTitleForced labour for forestry: the twentieth century history of colonialisation and settlement in the north of Perm Europe-Asia Studies 7 1055–1085 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0966813022000017131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Ricardo (1971) On the principles of political economic and taxation Penguin Books London

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Ruutso (2001) From village to municipality I. Alanen J. Nikula H. Põder R. Rutsoo (Eds) Decollectivisation, destruction and disillusionment Ashgate Aldershot 305–349

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Stark L. Bruszt (1998) Postsocialist pathways Cambridge University Press Cambridge 270 pp

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Thompson J. Francis R. Levacic J. Mitchell (2001) Markets, hierarchies and networks Sage Publications London 302 pp

    Google Scholar 

  27. O. E. Williamson (2000) ArticleTitleThe new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead Journal of Economic Literature 38 595–613

    Google Scholar 

  28. World Bank/Norwegian Forestry Group. 1997. Preparatory document for “the pilot project for sustainable forest management”. Oslo/Moscow, 36 pp.

  29. World Bank. 1998. CEOs forum—forest industry and conservation. Working Group reports: Russia—final report 13 July, World Bank, 7 pp.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Lars Carlsson at Luleå Technical University, Sweden and two anonymous reviewers of the Journal for their comments on an earlier version of this paper. The paper is based on research funded by the Research Council of Norway and Norwegian Council for Higher Education through the Norwegian cooperation programme with Russia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sveinung Eikeland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eikeland, S., Eythorsson, E. & Ivanova, L. From Management to Mediation: Local Forestry Management and the Forestry Crisis in Post-Socialist Russia. Environmental Management 33, 285–293 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0104-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0104-z

Navigation