Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Microvascular Anatomy of Superior and Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (SGAP and IGAP) Flaps: A Fresh Cadaveric Study and Clinical Implications

  • Original Article
  • Experimental/Special Topics
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Our study aimed to highlight anatomical similarities, differences, and variations in the microvascular anatomy between superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP and IGAP) flaps.

Method

Thirty gluteal flaps (15 SGAP and 15 IGAP) were studied on 22 adult fresh cadavers. We recorded the number and location of perforators, the characteristics of the main perforator (course, length, and diameter at the level of division at the greater sciatic foramen), and the anatomical variations of the submuscular venous plexus.

Results

The mean number of perforators was similar in both flaps (n = 7). We found a statistically significant difference in the total length of the vascular pedicle between SGAP (mean = 9.80 cm) and IGAP (mean = 13.36 cm) flaps, which correlated strongly with the difference in the intramuscular length (mean difference = 3.40 cm) of the perforator. There was no statistically significant difference in the diameter of the superior and inferior gluteal vessels at the point of pedicle division. The complex submuscular venous plexus, which is typically found on SGAP flaps deep to the sacral fascia, was never encountered on IGAP flaps. Perforators originating from the inferior gluteal artery were found on the lower half of five superior gluteal flaps. These were dominant perforators in two cases. We also report a rare anatomical communication between superior and inferior gluteal vessels deep to the piriformis muscle and a case of atheromatous disease of the inferior gluteal artery.

Conclusion

Our findings are highly relevant to clinical practice and contribute to the understanding of the vascular anatomy of SGAP and IGAP flaps and the successful use of these challenging flaps.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Box plot 1
Fig. 2
Box plot 2
Box plot 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S et al (1993) The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:678–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Verpaele AM, Blondeel PN, VanLanduyt K et al (1999) The superior gluteal artery perforator flap: an additional tool in the treatment of sacral pressure sores. Br J Plast Surg 52:385–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen RJ, Tucker C Jr (1995) Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:1207–1212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen RJ (1998) The superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg 25(2):293–302 (review)

  5. Boustred AM, Nahai F (1998) Inferior gluteal free flap breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 25:275–282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blondeel PN (1999) The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap: a valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 52:185–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS et al (2004) Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps: a critical analysis of 142 cases. Ann Plast Surg 52:118–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kronowitz SJ (2008) Redesigned gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(3):728–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Twinder S, Van Der Hulst R, Lataster A et al (2008) Superior gluteal artery perforator flap based on septal perforators : preliminary study. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):146e–148e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Twinder S, Chen CM, Massey MF et al (2011) Introducing the septocutaneous gluteal artery perforator flap: a simplified approach to microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(2):489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quilichini J, Hivelin M, Matar N et al (2012) Septocutaneous gluteal artery perforator flap in lateral decubitus position for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):385e–386e (Letter)

  12. Rad AN, Flores JI, Stapleton SM et al (2010) Clinical experience with the lateral septocutaneous superior gluteal artery perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 30(5):339–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Granzow ZW, Levine JL, Chiu ES et al (2006) Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg 59(6):614–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Allen RJ, Guerra AB, Erhard HA et al (2006) Superior gluteal artery perforator flap. In: Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC (eds) Perforator flaps—anatomy, technique and clinical applications, ch 26. St. Louis, Quality Medical Publishing, pp 485–497

  15. Allen RJ, Levine JC, Granzow JW (2006) The in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(2):333–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guerra AB, Allen RJ, Levine JL et al (2006) Inferior gluteal artery perforator flap. In: Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC (eds) Perforator flaps—anatomy, technique and clinical applications, ch 27. St. Louis, Quality Medical Publishing, pp 499–511

  17. Mirzabeigi MN, Au A, Jandali S et al (2011) Trials and tribulations with the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):614e–624e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen RJ (2011) Discussion: trials and tribulations with the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):625e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmadzadeh R, Bergeron L, Tang M et al (2007) The superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1551–1556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Song WC, Bee SM, Han SH et al (2006) Anatomical and radiological study of the superior and inferior gluteal arteries in the gluteus maximus muscle for musculocutaneous flap in Koreans. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg 59:935–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rozen WM, Ting JW, Grinsell D et al (2011) Superior and inferior gluteal artery perforators: in vivo anatomical study and planning for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(2):217–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lui KW, Hu S, Ahmad N et al (2009) Three-dimensional angiography of the superior gluteal artery and lumbar artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(1):79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nojima K, Brown SA, Acikel C et al (2006) Defining vascular supply and territory of thinned perforator flaps: part 2, Superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(6):1338–1348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kankaya Y, Ulusoy MG, Oruc M et al (2006) Perforating arteries of the gluteal region: anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 56(4):409–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hallock G (2009) A primer of schematics to facilitate the design of the preferred muscle perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(3):1107–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DellaCroce FJ, Sullivan SK (2005) Application and refinement of the superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for bilateral simultaneous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:97–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the mortuary technician, Dimitris Mourlas, and the entire staff of the Department of Forensic Medicine for their help in facilitating our study. We also thank the statistician, George Katsabouris, for performing the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthi Georgantopoulou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Georgantopoulou, A., Papadodima, S., Vlachodimitropoulos, D. et al. The Microvascular Anatomy of Superior and Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (SGAP and IGAP) Flaps: A Fresh Cadaveric Study and Clinical Implications. Aesth Plast Surg 38, 1156–1163 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0398-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0398-z

Keywords

Navigation