Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Upper Lateral Cartilage in Correcting Dorsal Irregularities: Section 2. The Suture Bridging Cephalic Extension of Upper Lateral Cartilages

  • Original Article
  • Craniofacial/Maxillofacial
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dorsal irregularity after hump reduction is one of the most annoying problems in aesthetic nasal surgery. Spreader grafts, cartilaginous autogenous thin (CATS) grafts, Skoog-type dorsal grafts, cartilage grafts, bone grafts, fascia grafts, dermal grafts and nonbiologic products such as silicon and polytetrafluoroethylene are used to overcome this problem. In cases managed with spreader flaps rather than graft procedures, problems may persist in the area of the nasal bones, whereas irregularities in the cartilage dorsum can be minimized. More specifically, the surgically treated surface of the dorsum’s upper third and the rhinion area [nasal bone and upper lateral cartilage (ULC) junction], which has the thinnest nasal soft tissue, present the greatest challenge for hiding irregularities and call for special attention.

Methods

The ULC has a cephalic extension with varying lengths under the nasal bone. When these pieces of cartilage are protected during hump excision and sutured to each other, a strong, smooth, and a single-unit structure can be obtained. This technique was applied to 76 patients between 2009 and 2010.

Results

Manual examination during the postoperative period showed no irregularities in 60 patients. In the remaining 16 patients, minimal irregularities in the bony region were encountered. In 4 of these patients, the irregularities were visible in the profile view, and in the remaining 12 patients, they were felt only by manual examination.

Conclusion

The bridging suture technique using cephalic extensions of the ULC is an improvement of the spreader flap technique to obtain a straight, smooth, and single-unit dorsum in rhinoplasty patients.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Numa W, Johnson CM Jr (2011) Surgical anatomy and physiology of the nose. In: Azizzadeh B, Murphy MR, Johnson CM Jr, Numa W (eds) Master techniques in rhinoplasty. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 21–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Erol OO (2000) The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2229–2241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McKinney P (1996) An aesthetic dorsum: the CATS graft. Clin Plast Surg 23:233–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skoog T (1966) A method of hump reduction in rhinoplasty: a technique for preservation of the nasal roof. Arch Otolaryngol 83:283–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yilmaz M, Vayvada H, Menderes A et al (2007) Dorsal nasal augmentation with rib cartilage graft: long-term results and patient satisfaction. J Craniofac Surg 18:1457–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson IT, Choi HY, Clay R et al (1998) Long-term follow-up of cranial bone graft in dorsal nasal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1869–1873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgkinson DJ (1999) Cranial bone grafts for dorsal nasal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1570–1571

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurley JM, Pilgram T, Perlyn CA et al (2001) Long-term outcome of autogenous rib graft nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1895–1905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pessey JJ, Vignea D, Serrano E et al (1987) Use of polytetrafluoroethilene (E-PTFE Gore Tex). Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 108:515–519

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Godin MS, Waldman SR, Johnson CM Jr (1999) Nasal augmentation using Gore-Tex: 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1:118–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruber PP, Park E, Newman J et al (2007) The spreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1903–1910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neu BR (2009) Use of the upper lateral cartilage sagittal rotation flap in nasal dorsum reduction and augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1079–1087

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manavbasi Yİ, Basaran İ (2011) The role of upper lateral cartilage in dorsal reconstruction after hump excision: Section 1. Spreader flap modification with asymmetric mattress suture and extension of the spreading effect by cartilage graft. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:487–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oneal RM, Izenberg PH, Schlesinger J (1993) Surgical anatomy of the nose. In: Daniel RK (ed) Aesthetic plastic surgery rhinoplasty. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp 3–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Kerem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manavbaşi, Y.İ., Kerem, H. & Başaran, İ. The Role of Upper Lateral Cartilage in Correcting Dorsal Irregularities: Section 2. The Suture Bridging Cephalic Extension of Upper Lateral Cartilages. Aesth Plast Surg 37, 29–33 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9967-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9967-1

Keywords

Navigation