Skip to main content
Log in

Male care and mating effort among Hadza foragers

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paternal care figures prominently in many scenarios of human evolution. Recently, however, such scenarios have been challenged on two scores. First, the level of male contribution may be insignificant. Second, male care may be provided as a form of mating effort, rather than parenting effort. In theory, since men can enhance their Darwinian fitness both by providing care to their own offspring if this raises offspring fitness and by pursuing additional mates if this leads to additional offspring, men should respond to payoffs from both mating and parenting effort. If men respond to payoffs from parenting effort, paternity ought to make a difference. And if men respond to payoffs from mating effort, mating opportunities ought to make a difference. I analyzed the impact of these two factors on variation in male care among the Hadza, a foraging society in Tanzania. Two predictions were tested: (1) biological children will receive more care than stepchildren, and (2) men will provide less care to their biological children as their mating opportunities increase. Both predictions were supported. These results suggest men provide care, in part, as parenting effort, and that they trade off parenting effort for mating effort when they have greater mating opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 21 January 1998 / Received in revised form: 24 January 1999 / Accepted: 1 February 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marlowe, F. Male care and mating effort among Hadza foragers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46, 57–64 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050592

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050592

Navigation