Abstract
An animal’s vulnerability to predators can be influenced by its behavior, morphology, body size, coloration, habitat preferences, and palatability. We tested whether the coloration of Bokermannohyla saxicola and Scinax machadoi tadpoles affects their survival when exposed to local visually oriented predators at a site in southeastern Brazil. We tested three aquatic invertebrates (Aeshnidae, Belostoma sp., Lethocerus sp.) and birds as tadpole predators. We predicted that predation rates would differ depending on the substrate where the tadpoles positioned themselves (light or dark), hypothesizing that each tadpole would use preferentially a background that conferred camouflage and that predation levels would be lower on such backgrounds compared to others. B. saxicola had higher survivorship than S. machadoi on light backgrounds at some instances, in accordance with its crypsis hypothesis. However, B. saxicola tadpoles did not use light backgrounds more often than dark ones. S. machadoi coloration looked disruptive on both light and dark backgrounds, and tadpoles showed no preference or differences in survival rates between these backgrounds. Predation rates did not differ between the two species in a way that could confirm a previous hypothesis of aposematic/mimetic coloration for S. machadoi tadpoles. Our results show that colorations that appear to function to impair visual detection may play this role at some circumstances but not others. Tadpole colorations may have evolved in another context, in which avoiding visual detection by predators was a stronger selective pressure. In a context with lower predation pressure from visually oriented predators, the expected background choice behavior for increased camouflage may not be strongly selected for.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alford RA (1999) Ecology, resource use and predation. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. The University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 240–278
Arnold SJ, Wassersug RJ (1978) Differential predation on the metamorphic anurans by gather snakes (Thamnophis): social behavior as a possible defense. Ecology 59:1014–1022
Bokermann WCA (1964) Dos nuevas especies de Hyla de Minas Gerais y notas sobre Hyla alvarengai Bok. (Amphibia, Salientia, Hylidae). Neotropica 10:67–76
Bokermann WCA, Sazima I (1973) Anfíbios da Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 1: Duas espécies novas de Hyla (Anura, Hylidae). Rev Bras Biol 33:531–528
Brodie ED Jr, Formanowicz DR, Brodie ED III (1978) The development of noxiousness of Bufo americanus tadpole to aquatic insect predators. Herpetologica 34:302–306
Bybee SM, Kaihileipihamekeola-Johnson K, Gering EJ, Whiting MF, Crandall KA (2012) All the better to see you with: a review of odonate color vision with transcriptomic insight into the odonate eye. Org Divers Evol 12:241–250
Caldwell JP, Thorpe JH, Jervey TO (1980) Predator–prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia 46:285–289
Calef GW (1973) Natural mortality of tadpoles in a population of Rana aurora. Ecology 54:741–758
Callisto M, Moreno P, Barbosa FAR (2001) Habitat diversity and benthic functional trophic groups at Serra do Cipó, Southeast Brazil. Rev Bras Biol 61:259–266
Cecil SG, Just JJ (1979) Survival rate, population density and development of a naturally occurring anuran larvae (Rana catesbeiana). Copeia 1979:447–453
Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Costa ZJ, Kishida O (2015) Nonadditive impacts of temperature and basal resource availability on predator–prey interactions and phenotypes. Oecologia 178:1215–1225
Dayton GH, Saenz D, Baum KA, Langerhans RB, Dewitt TJ (2005) Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans. Oikos 111:582–591
DeBenedictis PA (1974) Interspecific competition between tadpoles of Rana pipiens and Rana sylvatica: an experimental field study. Ecol Monogr 44:129–151
Dimitrova M, Merilaita S (2014) Hide and seek: properties of prey and background patterns affect prey detection by blue tits. Behav Ecol 25:402–408
Eklöv P, Werner EE (2000) Multiple predator effects on size-dependent behavior and mortality of two species of anuran larvae. Oikos 88:250–258
Endler JA (2006) Disruptive and cryptic coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2425–2426
Eterovick PC, Oliveira FFR, Tattersall GJ (2010) Threatened tadpoles of Bokermannohyla alvarengai (Anura: Hylidae) choose backgrounds that enhance crypsis potential. Biol J Linn Soc 101:437–446
Eterovick PC, Sazima I (2004) Amphibians from the Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Editora Puc Minas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Faivovich J, Haddad CFB, Garcia PCA, Frost DR, Campbell JA, Wheeler WC (2005) Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 294:1–240
Galdean N, Callisto M, Barbosa FAR (2000) Lotic ecosystems of Serra do Cipó, southeast Brazil: water quality and a tentative classification based on the benthic macroinvertebrate community. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 3:545–552
Galdean N, Callisto M, Barbosa FAR (2001) Biodiversity assessment of benthic macroinvertebrates in altitudinal lotic ecosystems of Serra do Cipó (MG-Brazil). Braz J Biol 61:239–248
Gascon C (1992) Aquatic predators and tadpole prey in Central Amazonia: field data and experimental manipulations. Ecology 73:971–980
Garwood JM (2006) Rana cascadae (cascade frog). Tadpole predation. Herpetol Rev 37:76
Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190
Herreid CF, Kinney S (1966) Survival of Alaskan woodfrog (Rana sylvatica) larvae. Ecology 47:1039–1041
Heyer WR, McDiarmid RW, Weigmann DL (1975) Tadpoles, predation and pond habitats in the tropics. Biotropica 7:100–111
Horta MAP, Melo AL, Bertoluci J (2010) A possible case of mimicry involving a heteropteran insect and an anuran tadpole. Herpetol Bull 114:4–7
IBAMA (1994) Manual de anilhamento de aves silvestres, 2nd edn. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis, Brasília, Brazil
IUCN (2012a) Eterovick PC, Nascimento LB, Silvano D. 2004. Bokermannohyla saxicola. In: IUCN red list of threatened species, version 2012.1., http:/www.iucnredlist.org
IUCN (2012b) Nascimento LB, Eterovick PC. 2010. Scinax machadoi. In: IUCN red list of threatened species, version 2012.1., http:/www.iucnredlist.org
Johnson JB, Saenz D, Adams CK, Hibbits TJ (2015) Naturally occurring variation in tadpole morphology and performance linked to predator regime. Ecol Evol 5:2991–3002
Kang C, Stevens M, Moon JY, Lee SI, Jablonski PG (2015) Camouflage through behavior in moths: the role of background matching and disruptive coloration. Behav Ecol 26:45–54
Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870
Kjernsmo K, Merilaita S (2012) Background choice as an anti-predator strategy: the roles of background matching and visual complexity in the habitat choice of the least killifish. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:4192–4198
Kopp K, Wachlevski M, Eterovick PC (2006) Environmental complexity reduces tadpolepredation by water bugs. Can J Zool 84:136–140
Kriska G, Csabai Z, Boda P, Malik P, Horváth G (2006) Why do red and dark-coloured cars lure aquatic insects? The attraction of water insects to car paintwork explained by reflection-polarization signals. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1667–1671
Lima CA, Siqueira PR, Gonçalves RMM, Vasconcelos MF, Leite LO (2010) Dieta de aves da Mata Atlântica: uma abordagem baseada em conteúdos estomacais. Ornitol Neotropical 21:425–438
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640
Lopes LE, Fernandes AM, Marini MA (2005a) Diet of some Atlantic forest birds. Ararajuba 13:95–103
Lopes LE, Fernandes AM, Marini MA (2005b) Predation on vertebrates by Neotropical passerine birds. Lundiana 6:57–66
Manhães MA (2003) Dieta de traupíneos (Passeriformes, Emberizidae) no Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Inheringia Sér Zool 93:59–73
Merilaita S, Lind J (2005) Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:665–670
Mogali SM, Shanbhag BA, Saidapur SK (2015) Strong food odours mask predation risk and affect evocation of defence behaviours in the tadpoles of Sphaerotheca breviceps. J Ethol 33:41–46
Morin PJ (1981) Predatory salamanders reverse the outcome of competition among three species of anuran tadpoles. Science 212:1284–1286
Nieser N, Lopez-Ruf M (2001) A review of Limnocoris Stål (Heteroptera: Naucoridae) in Southern South America east of the Andes. Tijdschr Entomol 144:261–328
Nieser N, Melo AL (1997) Os Heterópteros aquáticos de Minas Gerais. Guia introdutório com chave de identificação para as espécies de Nepomorpha e Gerromorpha. Editora UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Nomura F, Marco P, Carvalho AFA, Rossa-Feres DC (2013) Does background colouration affect the behaviour of tadpoles? An experimental approach with an odonate predator. Ethol Ecol Evol 25:185–198
Nomura F, Prado VHM, da Silva FR, Borges RE, Dias NYN, Rossa-Feres DC (2011) Are you experienced? Predator type and predator experience trade-offs in relation to tadpole mortality rates. J Zool 284:144–150
Peacor S, Schiesari L, Werner E (2007) Mechanisms of nonlethal predator effect on cohort size variation: ecological and evolutionary implications. Ecology 88:1536–1547
Pritchard G (1965) Prey capture by dragonfly larva. Can J Zool 43:271–289
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, version 3.2.2., https://cran.r-project.org/
Rafael JA, Melo GAR, Carvalho CJB, Casari SA, Constantino R (eds) (2012) Insetos do Brasil: Diversidade e Taxonomia. Holos Editora, Ribeirão Preto
Rebora M, Piersanti S, Gaino E (2004) Visual and mechanical cues used for prey detection by the larva of Libellula depressa (Odonata, Libellulidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 16:133–144
Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85:172–179
Sabino U, Duca C (2011) Utilização do tártaro emético no estudo de dieta de aves. Natureza on Line 9:144–145
Sick H (1997) Ornitologia Brasileira: edição revista e ampliada por José Fernando Pacheco. Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Silva WR, Giaretta AA (2008) Further notes on the natural history of the South American pepper frog, Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Braz J Biol 68:403–407
Skelly DK (1994) Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Anim Behav 47:465–468
Smith DC, Van Buskirk J (1995) Phenotypic design, plasticity, and ecological performance in two tadpole species. Am Nat 145:211–233
Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920
Takahara T, Kohmatsu Y, Maruyama A, Doi H, Yamanaka H, Yamaoka R (2012) Inducible defense behavior of an anuran tadpole: cue-detection range and cue types used against predator. Behav Ecol 23:863–868
Taylor J (1983) Orientation and flight behavior of a Neotenic salamander (Ambystoma gracile) in Oregon. Am Midl Nat 109:40–49
Van Buskirk J (2002) A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: relationships between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae. Am Nat 160:87–102
Villa J, McDiarmid RW, Gallardo JM (1982) Arthropod predators of Leptodactylidae frog foam nests. Brenesia 19:577–589
Voris HK, Bacon JP Jr (1966) Differential predation on tadpoles. Copeia 1966:594–598
Wassersug R (1971) On the comparative palatability of some dry-season tadpoles from Cost Rica. Am Midl Nat 86:101–109
Wassersug RJ, Sperry DG (1977) The relationship of locomotion to differential predation on Pseudacris triseriata (Anura: Hylidae). Ecology 58:830–839
Werner EE, Anholt BR (1993) Ecological consequences of the trade-offs between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am Nat 142:242–272
Werner EE, McPeek MA (1994) Direct and indirect effects of predators on two anuran species along an environmental gradient. Ecology 75:1368–1382
Woodward BD (1983) Predator–prey interactions and breeding-pond use of temporary-pond species in a desert anuran community. Ecology 64:1549–1555
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to J. Kloh, H. Kiefer, L. Penna, G. Pimenta, E. Souza, F. Cristóvão, and others for help during field work, to J. E. C. Figueira, L. Schiesari, and two anonymous referees for suggestions on previous versions of this manuscript, to F. S. Neves, A. Viana, and C. A. Galdino for help with statistics, to CEMAVE and Sisbio/ICMBio for permits (35152-1), to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (Fapemig; CRA APQ 01274-13), and to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the scholarships provided to JEMD and PCE (Productivity Grant 304422/2014-2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (Fapemig; CRA APQ 01274-13) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) who provided scholarships to JEMD and PCE (Productivity Grant 304422/2014-2).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed (permit obtained from ICMBio/Sisbio: 35152-1). During the whole study, 122 B. saxicola tadpoles and 126 S. machadoi tadpoles were predated, and 25 and 47 tadpoles, respectively, were injured by predators. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by K. Summers
Significance statement
The use of camouflage to avoid visually oriented predators may be an effective strategy as long as the prey is able to choose backgrounds that match their body colors (crypsis) or disrupts identification of body contour by matching some specific parts of the body but not others (disruptive camouflage). We used tadpoles of two species to test the hypotheses of (1) effective camouflage reducing predation and (2) tadpoles choosing backgrounds that promote lower predation levels. Although in some circumstances one species was shown to be less predated on a background expected to enhance its camouflage, it did not use this background more often than an alternative. Our results suggest that extant predation pressures may not be strong enough to shape background choice behavior in these tadpoles. Alternatively, tadpoles may choose backgrounds for camouflage just under imminent predation risk.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Espanha, J., de Vasconcelos, M.F. & Eterovick, P.C. The role of tadpole coloration against visually oriented predators. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 255–267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2044-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2044-4