Skip to main content
Log in

Taking care of group size and heterogeneity in social recognition systems

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blaustein AR, Porter RH (1996) The ubiquitous concept of recognition with special reference to kin. In: Bekoff M, Jamieson D (eds) Readings in animal cognition. MIT, Cambridge, pp 169–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellemi DO, Funderburk JE, Hall DW (1994) Seasonal abundance of flower-inhabiting Frankliniella species (Thysanoptera:Thripidae) on wild plant species. Environ Entomol 23:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Croney CC, Newberry RC (2007) Group size and cognitive processes. Appl Anim Behav Sci 103:215–228

  • de Bruijn PJA, Sabelis MW, Egas M (2014) Effects of kinship or familiarity? Small thrips larvae experience lower predation risk only in mixed-size sibling groups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1029–1035

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deligeorgidis PN, Giakalis L, Sidiropoulos G, Vaiopoulou M, Kaltsoudas G, Ipsilandis CG (2006) Longevity and reproduction of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips tabaci on cucumber under controlled conditions. J Entomol 3:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1997) Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:557–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1999) Schooling decisions in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are based on familiarity rather than kin recognition by phenotype matching. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Richardson DS, Burke T (2004) Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warbler is based on association and not on genetic relatedness. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:963–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebert AE, Starks PT (2004) The action component of recognition systems: a focus on the response. Ann Zool Fenn 41:747–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM (2004) Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Ann Zool Fenn 41:729–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133:407–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (2007) Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: prior association or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strodl MA, Schausberger P (2012) Social familiarity reduces reaction times and enhances survival of group-living predatory mites under the risk of predation. PLoS ONE 7(8):e43590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Schausberger.

Additional information

Communicated by J. C. Choe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schausberger, P. Taking care of group size and heterogeneity in social recognition systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68, 1561–1562 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1763-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1763-2

Keywords

Navigation