Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 11, pp 1731–1743

Simultaneous GPS tracking reveals male associations in a solitary carnivore

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-013-1581-y

Cite this article as:
Lührs, M.L. & Kappeler, P.M. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2013) 67: 1731. doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1581-y

Abstract

In hypercarnivorous species, females have large spatial requirements to meet their nutritional needs, and food competition among females is intense. As a result, females are typically solitary and territorial, and solitary males compete for access to dispersed females. Yet, largely anecdotal reports indicate that facultative male sociality may be more common in solitary carnivores than previously thought. We studied spatial interactions among fossas (Cryptoprocta ferox), Madagascar's largest carnivore, using simultaneous GPS tracking of 13 adult individuals to determine patterns of sex-specific spatial distribution and sociality. Male home ranges were larger than those of females, male home ranges overlapped more with those of other males than those of females with other females. Whereas some males were solitary, a subset of adult males was found to have very high home range overlap, high rates of co-location within <50 m, low minimum inter-individual distances, and significantly positive “dynamic interaction”. These associated dyads sometimes, but not always, were close relatives. The fact that solitary and associated males coexist in this population raises interesting questions concerning constraints and flexibility of social tolerance. This study yielded preliminary indications that female distribution appears to be primarily structured by resource competition, whereas male sociality seems to depend on demographic chance events, yet unknown proximate determinants of social tolerance, and it is associated with somatic and reproductive advantages. Male associations among carnivores are therefore more widespread and appear to be based on a wider range of factors than previously thought.

Keywords

Social organizationCarnivoresCryptoprocta feroxGPS telemetryMale socialityDynamic interaction test

Supplementary material

265_2013_1581_Fig4_ESM.jpg (75 kb)
Fig. 1

Selected plots of MCP home ranges per sex and month. Home ranges (colored lines) are presented within the Kirindy Forest (green contours) and marked individually (females F1–F4 on the left, males M1–M9 on the right). Ranges of the month stated are in thicker lines than those from other years (males) or months (females), which were included as additional information. For female ranges, resource information such as the course of a river (blue) and a central unforested area (green contour) was additionally provided. Female F4 (lower left) was tracked singly and therefore plotted with potential ranges of other females and its 50–90 % kernel ranges. For male ranges, additional information is provided for known and assumed locations of mating trees (red hash) in the area. Members of a male association are denoted with a “+” between their IDs. (JPEG 74 kb)

265_2013_1581_MOESM1_ESM.tif (732 kb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 732 kb)
265_2013_1581_Fig5_ESM.jpg (25 kb)
Fig. 1

Selected plots of MCP home ranges per sex and month. Home ranges (colored lines) are presented within the Kirindy Forest (green contours) and marked individually (females F1–F4 on the left, males M1–M9 on the right). Ranges of the month stated are in thicker lines than those from other years (males) or months (females), which were included as additional information. For female ranges, resource information such as the course of a river (blue) and a central unforested area (green contour) was additionally provided. Female F4 (lower left) was tracked singly and therefore plotted with potential ranges of other females and its 50–90 % kernel ranges. For male ranges, additional information is provided for known and assumed locations of mating trees (red hash) in the area. Members of a male association are denoted with a “+” between their IDs. (JPEG 74 kb)

265_2013_1581_MOESM2_ESM.tif (206 kb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 206 kb)
265_2013_1581_Fig6_ESM.jpg (115 kb)
Fig. 1

Selected plots of MCP home ranges per sex and month. Home ranges (colored lines) are presented within the Kirindy Forest (green contours) and marked individually (females F1–F4 on the left, males M1–M9 on the right). Ranges of the month stated are in thicker lines than those from other years (males) or months (females), which were included as additional information. For female ranges, resource information such as the course of a river (blue) and a central unforested area (green contour) was additionally provided. Female F4 (lower left) was tracked singly and therefore plotted with potential ranges of other females and its 50–90 % kernel ranges. For male ranges, additional information is provided for known and assumed locations of mating trees (red hash) in the area. Members of a male association are denoted with a “+” between their IDs. (JPEG 74 kb)

265_2013_1581_MOESM3_ESM.tif (829 kb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 829 kb)
265_2013_1581_Fig7_ESM.jpg (120 kb)
Fig. 1

Selected plots of MCP home ranges per sex and month. Home ranges (colored lines) are presented within the Kirindy Forest (green contours) and marked individually (females F1–F4 on the left, males M1–M9 on the right). Ranges of the month stated are in thicker lines than those from other years (males) or months (females), which were included as additional information. For female ranges, resource information such as the course of a river (blue) and a central unforested area (green contour) was additionally provided. Female F4 (lower left) was tracked singly and therefore plotted with potential ranges of other females and its 50–90 % kernel ranges. For male ranges, additional information is provided for known and assumed locations of mating trees (red hash) in the area. Members of a male association are denoted with a “+” between their IDs. (JPEG 74 kb)

265_2013_1581_MOESM4_ESM.tif (1 mb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 1,074 kb)
265_2013_1581_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (49 kb)
ESM Tables(PDF 49 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociobiology/Anthropology, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute of Zoology and AnthropologyGeorg-August-UniversityGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchGöttingenGermany